Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Economics of Science, Technology and Innovation ((ESTI,volume 23))

Abstract

From a policy perspective, the ā€œSā€ portion of Science and Technology (S&T) is relatively easy to deal with. Basic science is widely recognized as close to a pure public good, which means that massive under investment occurs without government support. This premise has been understood and incorporated into policy since the end of World War II.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • American Electronics Association. (1997).CybernationWashington, DC: The American Electronics Association.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Arthur, W. B. (1996). ā€œIncreasing Returns and the New World of Business.ā€Harvard Business ReviewJuly-August, 74: 100ā€“109.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Caracostas, P. and U. Muldur. (1995). ā€œLong Cycles, Technology and Employment: Current Obstacles and Outlook,ā€ST/ Review15: 75ā€“104.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Cohen, W. and D. Levinthal. (1989). ā€œInnovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D.ā€Economic JournalSeptember, pp. 569ā€“596.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Department of Commerce. (1998).The Emerging Digital EconomyWashington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce, April.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Doremus, P., W. Keller, L. Pauly, and S. Reich. (1998).The Myth of the Global CorporationPrinceton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Drucker, P. (1998). ā€œThe Discipline of Innovation.ā€Harvard Business Review76:6, November-December, pp. 149ā€“157 (reprint of his classic 1985Harvard Business Review article).

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Duga, J. (1994). ā€œIRI Forecast Reflects Major Change in How U.S. Industry Will Perform R&D.ā€Research-Technology ManagementMayā€”June, pp. 9ā€“11.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Eidt, C. and R. Cohen. (1997). ā€œReinventing Industrial Basic Research.ā€Research-Technology ManagementJanuaryā€”February, pp. 29ā€“36.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Finan, W. (1998).Metrology-Related Costs in the U.S. Semiconductor Industry 1990 1996 and 2001(NIST Planning Report 98ā€“4), Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology, May.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Freeman, C. (1979).ā€œThe Kondratiev Long Waveā€ in Structural Determinants of Employment and UnemploymentParis: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Geppert, L. (1994). ā€œIndustrial R&D: The New Priorities.ā€IEEE SpectrumSeptember, pp. 30ā€“41.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Kim, W. C. and R. Mauborgne. (1997). ā€œValue Innovation: The Strategic Logic of High Growth.ā€Harvard Business Review 75: 1January-February, pp. 102ā€“112.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Klein, S. and N. Rosenberg. (1986). ā€œAn Overview of Innovationā€ in R. Landau and N. Rosenberg, eds.The Positive Sum Strategy: Harnessing Technology for Economic GrowthWashington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Link, A. N. and J. T. Scott. (1998).Public Accountability: Evaluating Technology-Based InstitutionsNorwell, MA: Kluwer.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Luehrman, T. (1998). ā€œStrategy as a Portfolio of Real Options.ā€Harvard Business Review76, Septemberā€”October, pp. 89ā€“99.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Mowery, D. (1998). ā€œCollaborative R&D: How Effective Is It?ā€ISSUES in Science and TechnologyFall, pp. 37ā€“44.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • National Science Board. (1996).Science & Engineering Indicators ā€” 1996.Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation, NSB 96ā€“1.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Nelson, R. (1987).Understanding Technological Change as an Evolutionary ProcessAmsterdam: North Holland.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Nelson, R. (1992). ā€œWhat Is ā€˜Commercialā€™ and What Is ā€˜Publicā€™ About Technology, and What Should Be?ā€ in N. Rosenberg, R. Landau and D. Mowery, eds.Technology and the Wealth of NationsStanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Papaconstantinou, G., N. Sakurai, and A. Wyckoff. (1998). ā€œDomestic and International Product-Embodied R&D Diffusion.ā€Research Policy27: 301ā€“314.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Research Triangle Institute. (1999).Interoperability Cost Analysis of the U.S. Automotive Supply Chain(Planning Report 99ā€“3), Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology, March.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Rice, M., G. C. Oā€™Conner, L. Peters, and J. Morone. (1998). ā€œManaging Discontinuous Innovation.ā€Research-Technology Management41: 3, Mayā€“June, pp. 52ā€“58.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Richter, P. (1998). ā€œLong-Term Research and Its Impact on Society,ā€ Address to a Senate Forum on ā€œResearch as an Investment,ā€ February.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Schumpeter, J. (1939).Business Cycles: A Theoretical Historical and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist ProcessNew York: McGraw Hill.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Schumpeter, J. (1950).Capitalism Socialism and Democracy(3rded.), New York: Harper and Row.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Tassey, G. (1992).Technology Infrastructure and Competitive PositionNorwell, MA: Kluwer.

    BookĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Tassey, G. (1996). ā€œChoosing Government R&D Policies: Tax Incentives vs. Direct Funding.ā€Review of Industrial Organization 11:579ā€“600.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Tassey, G. (1997).The Economics of R&D PolicyWestport, CT: Quorum Books.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Tassey, G. (1999).R&D Trends in the U.S. Economy: Strategies and Policy Implications(NIST Planning Report 99ā€“2), Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology, March.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Tassey, G. (2000). ā€œStandardization in Technology-Based Markets.ā€Research Policy29: 587ā€“602.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • U.S. House of Representatives, Committee on Science. (1998).Unlocking Our Future: Towards a New National Science PolicyReport to Congress, Washington, DC.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Vonortas, N. (1997).Cooperation in Research and DevelopmentNorwell, MA: Kluwer.

    Google ScholarĀ 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

Ā© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tassey, G. (2001). R&D Policy Models and Data Needs. In: Feldman, M.P., Link, A.N. (eds) Innovation Policy in the Knowledge-Based Economy. Economics of Science, Technology and Innovation, vol 23. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1689-7_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1689-7_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5679-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-1689-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics