Abstract
It has long been an oddity that the food industry has been so quiet when it comes to influencing agricultural policy. Of course, some industry groups have made their position known on certain aspects of agricultural legislation, but, in general, the agri-food processing sector and the distribution sector have not exerted a major influence on policy. Academic interests have reflected this reality; the vast majority of analytical treatments of the politics of agricultural policy and agricultural trade have focussed on the influence of the farm lobby and their supporters in legislatures. Conventional wisdom considers consumer interests weak and diffused, and, hence, they have rarely received much political attention. Farm policy anomalies, such as the fact that massive transfers are made to relatively few small businesses from consumers or taxpayers, are explained in terms of the over-representation of the rural vote, the identification of political interest with production rather than consumption activities, or public sympathy for what is perceived as a poor and backward sector.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Barton, J. 1996. “Biotechnology, the Environment, and International Agricultural Trade.” The Georgetown International Environmental Law Review 9(95): 126–141.
Beers, G., A. Beulens, and J. van Dalen. 1998. “Chain Science as an Emerging Discipline.” Paper presented to the Third International Conference on Chain Management, Wageningen, Netherlands (28–29 May).
Bureau, J.C., S. Marette, and A. Schiavina. 1997. Non-Tariff Trade Barriers and Consumers’ Information: The Case of E.U.-U.S. Trade Disputes on Food Products. Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Department d’Economie, Unité de Grignon (July).
Cotterill, R.W. 1999. “Food Industry Consolidation: The Uncharted Global Venture.” Food Marketing Policy Center Newsletter, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT (April). The Economist. 1999. “In the Mill.” Staff paper. (20 March: 64–65).
European Commission. 1997. The General Principles of Food Law in the European Union, (Green Paper). COM(97): 176 (3 December)
FDA (Food and Drug Administration). 1997. Food Safety from Farm to Table: A National Food Safety Initiative. Report to U.S. President Clinton, Washington, DC: FDA (May).
Grant, W. 1999. “Biotechnology: A Source of Tensions in the U.S.-EU Trade Relations” (unpublished).
Financial Times. 1999. “FT 500.” Staff report (28 February).
Henderson, D.R., C.R. Handy, and S.A. Neff, ed. 1996. Globalization of the Processed Foods Market, Agricultural Economic Report No. 742. Washington, DC: USDA/ERS.
Hughes, D., ed. 1993. Breaking with Tradition: Building Partnerships and Alliances in the European Food Industry. Wye, UK: Wye College Press.
Josling, T. 1998. Agricultural Trade Policy: Completing the Reform. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics (April).
Kalaitzandonakes, N. and R. Maltsbarger. 1998. “Biotechnology and Identity-preserved Supply Chains.” Choices (Fourth Quarter): 15–18.
MacLaren, D. and T. Josling. 1999. “Competition Policy and International Agricultural Trade.” (unpublished)
Mander, J. and E. Goldsmith, eds. 1998. The Case Against the Global Economy. San Francisco, CA: Sierra Club Books.
Marsh, J. 1998. “The Economics of New Technology,” in Global Agribusiness, Premier Issue (December).
MAFF (Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries, and Food). 1998. The Food Standards Agency: A Force for Change. Washington, DC: The Stationery Office.
Roberts, D., T.E. Josling, and D. Orden. 1999. A Framework for Analyzing Technical Trade Barriers in Agricultural Markets, Technical Bulletin No. 1876, USDA/ERS, Washington DC (March).
Schnittker, J.A. 1998. “An Agricultural Revolution with Implications for Sustainability.” Choices (Fourth Quarter).
USDA (U.S. Department of Agriculture). 1997. The Food Safety Enforcement Enhancement Act of 1997. Washington, DC: USDA.
Urban, T.N. 1998. “Beyond Industrialization: The Prescription Food System.” Choices (Fourth Quarter): 43–44.
WTO (World Trade Organization). 1995. The Results of the Uruguay Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations: The Legal Texts. Geneva, Switzerland: WTO.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Josling, T. (2002). The Impact of Food Industry Globalization on Agricultural Trade Policy. In: Moss, C.B., Rausser, G.C., Schmitz, A., Taylor, T.G., Zilberman, D. (eds) Agricultural Globalization Trade and the Environment. Natural Resource Management and Policy, vol 20. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1543-2_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1543-2_15
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5606-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-1543-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive