Skip to main content

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to summarize the principles and the applications of the noising methods, a recent family of combinatorial optimization metaheuristics. We describe their commons features and their variants and we give the list of their applications to different combinatorial optimization problems. We also show how the simulated annealing algorithm and the threshold accepting algorithm can be considered as noising methods when the components of the noising methods are properly chosen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. E.H.L. Aarts and J.K. Lenstra (editors). Local Search in Combinatorial Optimization. Wiley, 1997.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. B. Alidaee. Experimental Design for Combinatorial Optimization Problems. Presented at INFORMS New Orleans 1995, New Orleans, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  3. B. Alidaee, M. Amini, and G.A. Kochenberger. Hybrid Metaheuristic Approaches to the Multi-Resource Generalized Assignment Problem: a Case Study of Tabu Search, Space Smoothing, and Noising Methods. 2nd Meta-heuristics International Conference (MIC-97), page 131, Sophia-Antipolis, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  4. B. Alidaee, J.T. Naidu, and E.L. Gillenwater. Heuristic Algorithms for Multiple Machine Scheduling with the Objective of Minimizing Total Weighted and Unweighted Tardiness. Presented at INFORMS Dallas 1997, Dallas, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  5. I. Althöfer and K.-U. Koschnick. On the Convergence of “Threshold Accepting”. Applied Mathematics and Optimization, 24:183–195, 1991.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. M.M. Amini, B. Alidaee, and M.J. Racer. Alternative Metaheuristics Approaches to the Multi-Resource Generalized Assignement Problem. Presented at INFORMS Dallas 1997, Dallas, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  7. G. Bogdanova. Optimal Codes Over an Alphabet of 4 Elements. Proceedings of the Fifth International Workshop on Algebraic and Combinatorial Coding Theory, pages 46–53, Sozopol, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  8. P. Boucher and G. Plateau. Étude des méthodes de bruit age appliquées au problème du sac à dos à plusieurs contraintes en variables 0–1. Actes des 5es Journées nationales sur la résolution pratique de problèmes NP-complets (JNPC’99), pages 151–162, Lyon, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  9. S.A. Canuto, C.C. Ribeiro, and M.G.C. Resende. Local Search with Perturbations for the Prize-Collecting Steiner Tree Problem. To appear in: Networks.

    Google Scholar 

  10. I. Charon and O. Hudry. The Noising Method: A New Combinatorial Optimization Method. Operations Research Letters, 14:133–137, 1993.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. I. Charon and O. Hudry. An Application of the Noising Method to MCDA. Abstracts of the 14th European Conference of Operations Research, page 15, Jerusalem, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  12. I. Charon and O. Hudry. Mixing Different Components of Metaheuristics. In: Metaheuristics: Theory and Applications, I.H. Osman and J.P. Kelly, editors, pages 589–603, Kluwer, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  13. I. Charon and O. Hudry. Lamarckian Genetic Algorithms Applied to the Aggregation of Preferences. Annals of Operations Research, 80:281–297, 1998.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. I. Charon and O. Hudry. Variations on the Noising Schemes for a Clustering Problem. Extended Abstracts of the Third Metaheuristics International Conference, pages 147–150, Angra dos Reis, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  15. I. Charon and O. Hudry. Noising Methods for a Clique Partitioning Problem. Submitted for publication.

    Google Scholar 

  16. I. Charon and O. Hudry. Application of the Noising Method to the Travelling Salesman Problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 125:266–277, 2000.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. I. Charon and O. Hudry. A Branch and Bound Algorithm to Solve the Linear Ordering Problem for Weighted Tournaments. To appear in: Discrete Applied Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  18. I. Charon and O. Hudry. Automatic Tuning of the Noising Methods. Submitted for publication.

    Google Scholar 

  19. I. Charon and O. Hudry. Descent with Mutations for the Aggregation of Relations. Submitted for publication.

    Google Scholar 

  20. I. Charon, O. Hudry, and A. Lobstein. A New Method for Constructing Codes. Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Algebraic and Combinatorial Coding Theory, pages 62–65, Novgorod, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  21. I. Charon, O. Hudry, and A. Lobstein. Application of the Noising Methods to Coding Theory. Abstracts of the 14th Triennial Conference of the International Federation of Operational Research Societies, page 174, Vancouver, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  22. W.-H. Chen and C.-S. Lin. A Hybrid Heuristic to Solve a Task Allocation Problem. Computers and Operations Research, 27:287–303, 2000.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. K.A. Dowsland. Simulated Annealing. In: Modern Heuristic Techniques for Combinatorial Problems, C. Reeves, editor, pages 20–69, McGraw-Hill, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  24. G. Dueck and T. Scheurer. Threshold Accepting: A General Purpose Optimization Algorithm Appearing Superior to Simulated Annealing. Journal of Computational Physics, 90:161–175, 1990.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. G. Dueck and J. Wirsching. Threshold Accepting Algorithms for Multi-Constraint 0–1 Knapsack Problems. Technical Paper TR 89 10 016, IBM Heidelberg Scientific Center, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  26. A. Fréville, S. Hanafi, and A. El Abdellaoui. Noising Method for the 0–1 Multidimensional Knapsack Problem. Premierès rencontres francophones de recherche opérationelle, page 53, Mons, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  27. D. Guillaume and F. Murtagh. An Application of XML and XLink using a Graph-Partitioning Method and a Density Map for Information Retrieval and Knowledge Discovery. In: Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems VIII, D.M. Mehringer, R.L. Plante, and D.A. Roberts, editors, pages 278–282, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  28. D. Guillaume and F. Murtagh. Clustering of XML Documents. To appear in: Computer Physics Communications.

    Google Scholar 

  29. S. Hanafi, A. Fréville, and A. El Abdellaoui. Comparison of Heuristics for the 0–1 Multidimensional Knapsack Problem. In: Metaheuristics: Theory and Applications, I.H. Osman and J.P. Kelly, editors, pages 449–465, Kluwer, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  30. C.-P. Hwang. Global and Local Search Heuristics for the Symmetric Travelling Salesman Problems. PhD Thesis, University of Mississippi, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  31. C.-P. Hwang, B. Alidaee, and J.D. Johnson. A Tour Construction Heuristic for the Travelling Salesman Problem. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 50:797–809, 1999.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. S.H. Jacobson, K.A. Sullivan, and A.W. Johnson. Discrete Manufacturing Process Design Optimization using Computer Simulation and Generalized Hill Climbing Algorithms. Engineering Optimization, 31:247–260, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. A.W. Johnson and S.H. Jacobson. On the Convergence of Generalized Hill Climbing Algorithms. Submitted for publication.

    Google Scholar 

  34. R.B. Kethley. Single and Multiple Machine Scheduling to Minimize Total Weighted Late Work: An Empirical Comparison of Scheduling Rules, Algorithms and Meta-Heuristics using Taguchi Loss Functions. PhD Thesis, University of Mississippi, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  35. J. Naidu, B. Alidaee, and E. Gillenwater. Heuristic Approaches to Minimize Tardiness Problems on Single Machine with Sequence Dependent Set-Up Times. Presented at INFORMS Dallas 1997, Dallas, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  36. I.H. Osman and J.P. Kelly (editors). Metaheuristics: Theory and Applications. Kluwer, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  37. C. Reeves (editor). Modern Heuristic Techniques for Combinatorial Problems. McGraw-Hill, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  38. V. Sudhakar and C. Siva Ram Murthy. A Modified Algorithm for the Graph Partitioning Problem. Integration, the VLSI Journal, 22:101–113, 1997.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. S. Voss, S. Martello, I.H. Osman, and C. Roucairol (editors). Meta-Heuristics: Advances and Trends in Local Search Paradigms for Optimization. Kluwer, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  40. F. Yvon. Prononcer par analogic motivation, formalisation et évaluation. Ph.D. Thesis, ENST, Paris, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Charon, I., Hudry, O. (2002). The Noising Methods: A Survey. In: Essays and Surveys in Metaheuristics. Operations Research/Computer Science Interfaces Series, vol 15. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1507-4_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1507-4_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5588-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-1507-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics