Abstract
Using firm level data from Taiwan, this paper examines the link between firm size, growth and productivity. It shows that firms grow because they are more productive and not because they are larger in size. Indeed, the statistical analysis shows that while employment growth among Taiwanese firms was positively related to initial levels of total factor productivity, it was negatively related to initial size. The paper also shows that the productivity-size relationship has a virtuous cycle built in. More productive firms get larger and, in the process, obtain access to resources and information which enables them to become more productive. One implication of these results is that public policies should target productivity rather than size and should support reforms that make it possible for market mechanisms to weed out low productivity firms while facilitating the entry or growth of high productivity firms. Taiwan’s ability to keep entry and exit costs low is one reason why productivity gains there have been high.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Aw, Bee-Yan and Mark J. Roberts, 1988, ‘Price and Quality Comparisons for U.S. Footwear Imports: An Application of Multilateral Index Numbers’, in Robert C. Feenstra (ed.), Empirical Methods for International Trade, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Aw, Bee-Yan, Geeta Batra and Mark J. Roberts, 2001, ‘Firm Heterogeneity and Export-domestic Price Differentials: A Study of Taiwanese Electronics Products’, Journal of International Economics 54, 149–169.
Aw, Bee-Yan, Xiaomin Chen and Mark J. Roberts, 2001, ‘Firm-Level Evidence on Productivity Differentials and Turnover in Taiwanese Manufacturing’, Journal of Development Economics 66, 51–86.
Aw, Bee-Yan, Sukkyun Chung and Mark J. Roberts, 2000, ‘Productivity and Turnover in the Export Market: Micro-Evidence From Taiwan and South Korea’, World Bank Economic Review 14, 65–90.
Baily, Martin Neil, Charles Hulten and David Campbell, 1992, ‘Productivity Dynamics in Manufacturing Plants’, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity: Microeconomics 1992. Brookings Institution, Washington, D.C.
Caves, Douglas W., Laurits Christensen and Erwin Diewert, 1982, ‘Output, Input, and Productivity Using Superlative Index Numbers’, Economic Journal 92, 73–96.
Caves, Douglas W., Laurits Christensen and Michael Tretheway, 1981, ‘U.S. trunk Air Carriers, 1972–1977: A Multilateral Comparison of Total Factor Productivity’, in Thomas Cowing and Rodney E. Stevenson (eds.), Productivity Measurement in Regulated Industries, New York: Academic Press.
Good, David H., M. Ishaq Nadiri and Robin Sickles, 1997, ‘Index Number and Factor Demand Approaches to the Estimation of Productivity’, in Hashem Pesaran and Peter Schmidt (eds.), Handbook of Applied Econometrics, Vol. II: Microeconometrics, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Hobday, Michael, 1995, Innovation in East Asia: The Challenge to Japan, Hampshire, U.K.: Edward Elgar.
Levy, Brian and Wen-Jeng Kuo, 1991, ‘Strategic Orientations of Firms and the Performance of Korea and Taiwan in Frontier Industries: Lessons from Comparative Case Studies of Keyboard and Personal Computer Assembly’, World Development 19(4), 363–374.
Olley, G. Steven and Ariel Pakes, 1996, ‘The Dynamics of Productivity in the Telecommunications Equipment Industry’, Econometrica 64, 1263–1297.
Pack, Howard, 1992, ‘New Perspectives on Industrial Growth in Taiwan’, in Gustav Ranis (ed.), Taiwan From Developing to Mature Economy, Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.
Roberts, Mark J., 1996, ‘Colombia, 1977–1985: Producer Turnover, Margins and Trade Exposure’, in Mark J. Roberts and James R. Tybout (eds.), Industrial Evolution in Developing Countries: Micro Patterns of Turnover, Productivity, and Market Structure, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tybout, James R., 1996a, ‘Chile, 1976–1986: Trade Liberalization and its Aftermath’, in Mark J. Roberts and James R. Tybout (eds.), Industrial Evolution in Developing Countries: Micro Patterns of Turnover, Productivity, and Market Structure, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tybout, James R., 1996b, ‘Heterogeneity and Productivity Growth: Assessing the Evidence’, in Mark J. Roberts and James R. Tybout (eds.), Industrial Evolution in Developing Countries: Micro Patterns of Turnover, Productivity, and Market Structure, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Aw, BY. (2002). Productivity Dynamics of Small and Medium Enterprises in Taiwan. In: Iqbal, F., Urata, S. (eds) Small Firm Dynamism in East Asia. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0963-9_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0963-9_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5326-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-0963-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive