Abstract
In 1856, Michael Faraday (1791-1867) carried out an extensive program of research to explore the properties of thin films of metallic gold. Such films had long been of interest to him because they possess the peculiar property of appearing gold in color by reflected light, but green by transmitted light. Faraday hoped this behavior would model the general interaction of light and matter, perhaps extending his earlier finding that magnetic fields could affect a beam of polarized light passing through a highly refractive substance. In the course of this work, Faraday prepared over 600 microscope slides with thin metallic films adhering to them. Most of these epistemic artifacts have survived, as have his extensive diary records. Examination of this material permits reconstruction of his successive attempts to create a kind of dialogue with nature and provides evidence for his sophisticated ability to interactively create a microverse that could expand his mental microverse of field lines of force. While he failed to achieve his larger goals, the surviving specimens constitute a series of increasingly articulated representations of the structure of metallic matter. The case is thus one in which the “model” converges with the very thing intended to be modelled.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Andersen, H., 2001, The development of family resemblance concepts, in this volume, pp.95111.
Blondel, C. and Dörries, M., eds., 1994, Restaging Coulomb: Usages, Controverses et Réplications Autour de la Balance de Torsion, Leo S. Olschki, Firenze.
Cantor, G., 1991, Michael Faraday: Sandemanian and Scientist, St. Martin’s Press, New York.
Cantor, G. and Hodges, M.J.S., eds., 1981, Conceptions of Ether: Studies in the History of Ether Theories, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Cavicchi, E., 1997, Experimenting with magnetism: Ways of learning of Joann and Faraday, American Journal of Physics 65:867–882.
Chen, X., 2000, Instrumental Traditions and Theories of Light: The Uses of Instruments in the Optical Revolution, Kluwer/Plenum, Dordrecht.
Dunbar, K., 2001, What scientific thinking reveals about the nature of cognition, in: Designing for Science: Implications from Everyday, Classroom, and Professional Settings, K. Crowley, CD. Schunn, and T. Okada, eds., Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 115–140.
Faraday, M., 1827, Chemical Manipulation; Being Instructions to Students in Chemistry, W. Phillips, London.
Faraday, M., 1846, Thoughts on ray vibrations, Philosophical Magazine 38:345–350.
Faraday, M., 1852, On the physical character of the lines of magnetic force, Philosophical Magazine 3:216220. Reprinted in M. Faraday, ed., 1855, Experimental Researches in Electricity, Vol. 3, Richard Taylor & William Francis, London, pp. 407–437.
Faraday, M., 1857, Experimental relations of gold (and other metals) to light, Philosophical Transactions, 145181 (read Feb. 5, 1857). Reprinted in M. Faraday, ed., 1859, Experimental Researches in Chemistry and Physics, Richard Taylor & William Francis, London, pp. 391–442.
Faraday, M., 1858, Note on the irregular fusibility of ice, Philosophical Transactions, 228229 (read Dec. 17, 1857). Reprinted in M. Faraday, ed., 1859, Experimental Researches in Chemistry and Physics, Richard Taylor & William Francis, London, pp. 374–377.
Fisher, H.J., 1992, Faraday’s two voices, Physis: Rivista Internazionale di Storia della Scienza 29:165–186.
Fisher, H.J., 2001, Faraday’s Experimental Researches in Electricity: Guide to a First Reading, Green Lion Press, Santa Fe, NM.
Gentner, D., Brem, S., Ferguson, R.W., Markman, A.B., Levidow, B.B., Wolff, P., and Forbus, K.D., 1997, Analogical reasoning and conceptual change: A case study of Johannes Kepler, Journal of the Learning Sciences 6:3–40.
Gooding, D., 1982, A convergence of opinion on the divergence of lines: Faraday and Thomson’s discussion of diamagnetism, Notes and Records of the Royal Society of London 36:243–259.
Gooding, D., 1990, Experiment and the Making of Meaning, Kluwer, Dordrecht.
Gorman, M.E., 1997, Mind in the world: Cognition and practice in the invention of the telephone, Social Studies of Science 27:583–624.
Graham, T., 1861, Liquid diffusion applied to analysis, Philosophical Transactions, 151:183–224.
Grove, W., 1839, On a small voltaic battery of great energy, Philosophical Magazine 15:287–293.
Hecht, E. and Zajac, A., 1974, Optics, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
Heering, P., 1994, The replication of the torsion balance experiment: the inverse square law and its refutation by early XIX century German physicists, in: Restaging Coulomb: Usages, Controverses et Replications Autour de la Balance de Torsion, C. Blondel and M. Dörries, eds., Leo S. Olschki, Firenze, pp. 47–66.
Hutchins, E., 1995, How a cockpit remembers its speeds, Cognitive Science 19:265–288.
Ippolito, M.F. and Tweney, R.D., 1995, The inception of insight, in: The Nature of Insight, R.J. Sternberg and J.E. Davidson, eds., The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 433–462.
James, F.A.J.L., 1985, “The optical mode of investigation”: light and matter in Faraday’s natural philosophy, in: Faraday Rediscovered: Essays on the Life and Work of Michael Faraday, 17911867, D. Gooding and F.A.J.L. James, eds., Macmillan, Basingstoke, UK, pp. 137–162.
James, F.A.J.L., ed., 1999, The Correspondence of Michael Faraday; Volume 4, 1849–1855, Institution of Electrical Engineers, London.
Kurz, E.M. and Hertwig, R., 2001 (in press), To know an experimenter ..., in: The Essential Brunswik: Beginnings, Explications, Applications, K.R. Hammond and T.R. Stewart, eds., Oxford University Press, New York.
Kurz, E.M. and Tweney, R.D., 1998, The practice of mathematics and science: From calculus to the clothesline problem, in: Rational Models of Cognition, M. Oaksford and N. Chater, eds., Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 415–438.
Langley, P., and Jones, R., 1988, A computational model of scientific insight, in: The Nature of Creativity, R. Sternberg, ed.,Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 177–201.
Magnani, L., 2001, Abduction, Reason, and Science: Processes of Discovery and Explanation, Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York.
Martin, T., ed., 1936, Faraday’s Diary: Being the Various Philosophical Notes of Experimental Investigation Made by Michael Faraday During the Years 18201862, vol. 7, G. Bell, London.
Nersessian, N., 1984, Faraday to Einstein: Constructing Meaning in Scientific Theories, Kluwer, Dordrecht.
Nersessian, N., 1985, Faraday’s field concept, in: Faraday Rediscovered: Essays on the Life and Work of Michael Faraday, 17911867, D. Gooding and F.A.J.L. James, eds., Macmillan, Basingstoke, UK, pp. 175–188.
Nersessian, N., 1999, Model-based reasoning in conceptual change, in: Model-Based Reasoning in Scientific Discovery, L. Magnani, N.J. Nersessian and P. Thagard, eds., Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York, pp. 5–22.
Parkes, S., 1822, The Chemical Catechism, With Tables, Notes, Illustrations, and Experiments, Tenth edition, Baldwin, Cradock, and Joy, London.
Rheinberger, H.J., 1997, Toward a History of Epistemic Things: Synthesizing Proteins in the Test Tube, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.
Roscoe, H.E. and Schorlemmer, C., 1886, A Treatise on Chemistry, Volume II(1): Metals, D. Appleton and Co., New York.
Stokes, G.G., 1852, On the change of refrangibility of light, Philosophical Transactions. Reprinted in G.G. Stokes, Mathematical and Physical Papers, Vol. 3., Johnson Reprint Corp., New York, 1966, pp. 277–413.
Tilley, R., 2000, Colour and the Optical Properties of Materials, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK.
Tweney, R.D., 1992, Stopping time: Faraday and the scientific creation of perceptual order, Physis: Rivista Internazionale di Storia della Scienza 29:149–164.
Tweney, R.D., 2000, Faraday’s Microscope Slides; A Catalog of the Royal Institution Collection, Unpublished manuscript, The Royal Institution of Great Britain, London.
Tweney, R.D., 2001, Scientific thinking: A cognitive-historical approach, in: Designing for Science: Implications from Everyday, Classroom, and Professional Settings, K. Crowley, CD. Schunn and T. Okada, eds., Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 141–176.
Tweney, R.D. and Gooding, D., eds., 1991, Faraday’s 1822 “Chemical Notes, Hints, Suggestions, and Objects of Pursuit”, The Science Museum and Peter Peregrinus, Ltd., London.
Wilkinson, C.H., 1804, Elements of Galvanism in Theory and Practice, John Murray, London.
Williams, L.P., 1965, Michael Faraday: A Biography, Basic Books, New York.
Williams, L.P., ed., 1971, The Selected Correspondence of Michael Faraday, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Zhang, J. and Norman, D.A., 1995, A representational analysis of numeration systems, Cognition 57:271–295.
Zsigmondy, R., 1909, Colloids and the Ultramicroscope: A Manual of Colloid Chemistry and Ultramicroscopy, translated by J. Alexander, John Wiley & Sons, New York (originally published 1905).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tweney, R.D. (2002). Epistemic Artifacts: Michael Faraday’s Search for the Optical Effects of Gold. In: Magnani, L., Nersessian, N.J. (eds) Model-Based Reasoning. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0605-8_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0605-8_17
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5154-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-0605-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive