Skip to main content

The Economic Impact of Herbicide Tolerant Canola in Canada

  • Chapter
The Economic and Environmental Impacts of Agbiotech

Abstract

The ultimate question asked of any change in technology is “qui bono? ” or “who benefits? ” Past waves of technological change in the agrifood sector have delivered a relatively straightforward distribution of benefits and costs (see Alston et al., 2000). Agricultural biotechnology has potentially changed that historical distribution of impacts. Whereas many of the innovations in the canola industry have been yield-enhancing traits, developed by public researchers and provided at low (or no) cost to producers, most recent developments have occurred in the private sector, protected by enhanced private intellectual property rights and commercialized through increasingly proprietary systems (Phillips & Khachatourians, 2001).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alston, J., Marra, M., Pardey, P., & Wyatt, T. (2000). Research returns redux: A meta-analysis of the rates of returns to agricultural R&D (Research Report 113). Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aulie, P. (1996). Genetically engineered herbicide tolerant canola: A multiple account evaluation. Master’s Thesis. Saskatoon: University of Saskatchewan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA). (1998). Canadian varieties, January 1, 1923 to June 24, 1998. Special tabulation from the Plant Health and Production Division.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canadian Food Inspection Agency. (1998). Status of new plant varieties applied for protection under PBR: List of varieties, by crop kind. Available on the World Wide Web: http:// www.cfia-acia.agr.ca/english/plant/pbr/home_e.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canadian Food Inspection Agency. (1999). Summary of experimental releases. Special tabulation for Brassica napus and rapa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, Craig. (2000). Telephone communication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). (2000). FAOSTAT: Agriculture data. Available on the World Wide Web: http://apps.fao.org/cgi-bin/nph-db.pl?subset=agriculture.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulton, M., & Keyowski, L. (1999). The producer benefits of herbicide-resistant canola. AgBioForum, 2(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Funk G.D., Molder, P., & Phillips, P. (1998). Optimum location in Saskatchewan for a dockage processing plant (Agricultural Development Fund Research Report).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, R., & Malla, S. (1998). The evaluation of the economic and external health benefits from canola research. In J. Alston & P. Pardey (Eds.), Returns to Agricultural Research (forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, R., Malla, S. & and Phillips, P. (1999). The effectiveness of the research funding in the canola industry. Saskatchewan Agriculture and Food.

    Google Scholar 

  • Industry Canada. (2000). Strategis: Imports and exports by product, 2000. Available on the World Wide Web: http://strategis.ic.gc.ca/sc_mrkti/tdst/engdoc/tr_homep.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, C. (1999). Transgenic crops worldwide: Current situation and future outlook. Paper presented at the conference Agricultural Biotechnology in Developing Countries: Towards Optimizing the Benefits for the Poor, sponsored by ZEF and ISAAA in collaboration with AgrEvo and DSE, Nov. 15–16, 2000, Bonn.

    Google Scholar 

  • KPMG. (1999). Report on the compliance costs facing industry and government regulators in relation to labeling genetically modified foods.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, H., & Furtan, H. (1997). Economics of transgenic herbicide-tolerant canola: The case of western Canada. Food Policy, 24, 431–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moschini, G., & Lapan, H. (1997). Intellectual property rights and the welfare effects of agricultural R&D. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moschini, G., Lapan, H., & Sobolevsky, A. (1999). Roundup Ready soybeans and welfare effects in the soybean complex. Agribusiness 1999, 16, 33–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagy, J., & Furtan, H. (1978). Economic costs and returns from crop development research: The case of rapeseed breeding in Canada. CJAE, 26, 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organic Producer Information System (OPIS). (n.d.). Saskatchewan Research Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perillat, B., & Phillips, P. (1999). Farmer returns from herbicide tolerant canola: A Saskatchewan case study. University of Saskatchewan Working Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, P. (forthcoming). International trade in genetically modified agri-food products. In C. Moss, G. Rausser, A. Schmitz, S. Taylor & D. Zilberman (Eds.), Agricultural Globalization, Trade and the Environment. Kluwer, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, P., & McNeill, H. (forthcoming). “Labeling for GM foods: Theory and practice.” In V.Santaniello, R.E. Evenson & D. Zilberman (Eds.), Market Development for Genetically Modified Foods. CAB International, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, P.W.B., & Khachatourians, G.G. (2001). The biotechnology revolution in global agriculture: Invention, innovation and investment in the canola sector. Oxford: CABI.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, P., & Smyth, S. (1999). Competitors co-operating: Establishing a supply chain to manage genetically modified canola. Presentation to the Economics of Quality Control in Agriculture Conference, Saskatoon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serecon Management Consulting Inc. and Koch Paul Associates. (2001). An agronomic and economic assessment of transgenic canola. Prepared for the Canola Council of Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, S., & Phillips, P.W.B. (2000). Managing the value of new-trait varieties in the canolasupply chain in Canada. Proceedings of the 4th Wageningen Supply Chain Conference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, A., & Furtan, H. (1985). An investigation in the rates of return from the Canadian crop breeding program. University of Saskatchewan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, A., Furtan, H., & Downey, K. (1984). Biotechnology and rapeseed breeding: Some economic considerations. Manuscript report prepared for the Science Council of Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wensley, M. (1996). Institutional change and the canola industry in Saskatchewan. University of Saskatchewan mimeograph.

    Google Scholar 

  • Western Producer, The. (2000). Triple-resistant canola weeds found in Alta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zatylny, T. (1998). Canola on biotechnology (website). Canola Council of Canada.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Phillips, P.W.B. (2003). The Economic Impact of Herbicide Tolerant Canola in Canada. In: Kalaitzandonakes, N. (eds) The Economic and Environmental Impacts of Agbiotech. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0177-0_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0177-0_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-4954-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-0177-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics