Abstract
In this chapter I compare catalytic theory of causality with structural–systemic theory of causality. I begin with the discussion about why the notion of causality matters and how it is related to scientific explanation. I show that linear cause–effect (i.e., efficient) understanding of causality followed in the modern mainstream psychology is limited and does not allow to understand what the studied thing or phenomenon is. I propose that structural–systemic causality is better grounded as a theory of scientific explanation. Next I analyze basic notions of catalytic causality theory and compare them with those from the structural–systemic theory. Theoretically important notions discussed in the chapter are: ‘system’, ‘whole’, ‘part’, ‘relationship’, ‘downward causality’, and ‘catalytic causality’. Structural–systemic definition of the notion of ‘quality’ is also provided and justified. I demonstrate that catalytic causality theory, even though being substantial achievement over efficient causality theory, is internally incoherent. I suggest that the very use for psychology in particular and science in general notion of catalysis is better understood in the framework of structural-systemic theory.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Andersen, P. B., Emmeche, C., Finnemann, N. O., & Christiansen, P. V. (Eds.). (2000). Downward causation. Minds, bodies, and matter. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.
Aristotle (1941a). Metaphysics. (Metaphysica). In R. McKeon (Ed.), The basic works of Aristotle (pp. 681–926). New York: Random House.
Aristotle (1941b). Organon. In R. McKeon (Ed.), The basic works of Aristotle (pp. 7–212). New York: Random House.
Aristotle (1941c). Physics. (Physica.). In R. McKeon (Ed.), The basic works of Aristotle (pp. 213–394). New York: Random House.
Aristotle (1941d). Posterior Analytics. In R. McKeon (Ed.), The basic works of Aristotle (pp. 110–186). New York: Random House.
Beckstead, Z., Cabell, K. R., & Valsiner, J. (2009). Generalizing through conditional analysis: Systemic causality in the world of eternal becoming. Humana Mente, 11, 65–80.
Cabell, K. R. (2010). Mediators, regulators, and catalyzers: A context-inclusive model of trajectory development. Psychology and Society, 3, 26–41.
Cabell, K. R. (2011a). Catalysis: Cultural constructions and the conditions for change. Journal of Integrated Social Sciences, 2, 1–12.
Cabell, K. R. (2011b). The systemic conditions of catalysis: What psychology can (and cannot) learn from chemistry? Paper presented at the 14th Biennial Conference of the International Society for Theoretical psychology, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Chambers, E. (1728). Cyclopædia, or, an universal dictionary of arts and sciences: Containing the definitions of the terms, and accounts of the things signify’d thereby, in the several arts, both liberal and mechanical, and the several sciences, human and divine: The figures, kinds, properties, productions, preparations, and uses, of things natural and artificial: The rise, progress, and state of things ecclesiastical, civil, military, and commercial: With the several systems, sects, opinions, & c: Among philosophers, divines, mathematicians, physicians, antiquaries, criticks, & c: The whole intended as a course of antient and modern learning. In two volumes. Volume the Second. London: J. and J. Knapton et al. http://digicoll.library.wisc.edu/HistSciTech/subcollections/CyclopaediaAbout.html. Accessed 21 July 2009.
Descartes, R. (1985). Discourse on the method of rightly conducting one’s reason and seeking the truth in the sciences. (Originally published in 1637). In J. Cottingham, R. Stoothoff, & D. Murdoch (Eds.), The philosophical writings of Descartes. Volume 1 (pp. 111–151). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Dooremalen, H., & Borsboom, D. (2010). Metaphors in psychological conceptualization and explanation. In A. Toomela & J. Valsiner (Eds.), Methodological thinking in psychology: 60 years gone astray? (pp. 121–144). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.
Hegel, G. W. F. (1969). Science of logic. (Originally published in 1831). In H. D. Lewis (Ed.), Hegel’s science of logic. New York: Humanity Books.
Hume, D. (1999). An enquiry concerning human understanding. (Originally published in 1748). In T. L. Beauchamp (Ed.), David Hume. An enquiry concerning human understanding. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Koffka, K. (1935). Principles of Gestalt psychology. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Levine, M. W. (2000). Levine and Shefner’s fundamentals of sensation and perception. Third edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Marshall, J. G., & Rutledge, P. V. (1959). A higher hydrogen peroxide, H2O4? Nature, 184, 2013–2014.
Salvatore, S., & Valsiner, J. (2010). Idiographic science on its way: Towards making sense of psychology. In S. Salvatore, J. Valsiner, S. Strout-Yagodzynsky, & J. H. Clegg (Eds.), YIS: Yearbook of Idiographic Science. Volume 1/ 2008 (pp. 9–19). Rome: Firera and Liuzzo Publishing.
Swathi, R. S., & Sebastian, K. L. (2008). Molecular mechanism of heterogeneous catalysis. The 2007 Nobel Prize in chemistry. Resonance, 13, 548–560.
Toomela, A. (1996). How culture transforms mind: A process of internalization. Culture and Psychology, 2, 285–305.
Toomela, A. (2007a). Culture of science: Strange history of the methodological thinking in psychology. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 41, 6–20.
Toomela, A. (2007b). History of methodology in psychology: Starting point, not the goal. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 41, 75–82.
Toomela, A. (2008). Variables in psychology: A critique of quantitative psychology. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 42, 245–265.
Toomela, A. (2009). How methodology became a toolbox—and how it escapes from that box. In J. Valsiner, P. Molenaar, M. Lyra, & N. Chaudhary (Eds.), Dynamic process methodology in the social and developmental sciences (pp. 45–66). New York: Springer.
Toomela, A. (2010a). Biological roots of foresight and mental time travel. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 44, 97–125.
Toomela, A. (2010b). Methodology of idiographic science: Limits of single-case studies and the role of typology. In S. Salvatore, J. Valsiner, J. T. Simon, & A. Gennaro (Eds.), Yearbook of idiographic science, volume 2/2009 (pp. 13–33). Rome: Firera & Liuzzo Publishing.
Toomela, A. (2010c). Poverty of modern mainstream psychology in autobiography. Reflections on A History of Psychology in Autobiography, Volume IX. Culture and Psychology, 16, 127–144.
Toomela, A. (2010d). Quantitative methods in psychology: Inevitable and useless. Frontiers in Psychology, 1, 1–14.
Toomela, A. (2010e). What is the psyche? The answer depends on the particular epistemology adopted by the scholar. In S. Salvatore, J. Valsiner, J. T. Simon, & A. Gennaro (Eds.), Yearbook of idiographic science, volume 2/2009. (pp. 81–104). Rome: Firera & Liuzzo Publishing.
Toomela, A. (2012). Guesses on the future of cultural psychology: Past, present, and past. In J. Valsiner (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of culture and psychology (pp. 998–1033). New York: Oxford University Press.
Toomela, A. (in press-a). Methodology of cultural-historical psychology. In A. Yasnitsky, R. van der Veer, & M. Ferrari (Eds.), Handbook of cultural-historical theory. Cambridge University Press.
Toomela, A. (in press-b). There can be no cultural-historical 2 without neuropsychology. And vice versa. In A. Yasnitsky, R. van der Veer, & M. Ferrari (Eds.), Handbook of cultural-historical theory: Cambridge University Press.
Toomela, A. (in press-c). Mainstream psychology. In T. Teo (Ed.), Encyclopedia of critical psychology. Berlin: Springer. http://www.springerreference.com/index/chapterdbid/331098
Toomela, A., & Valsiner, J. (Eds.). (2010). Methodological thinking in psychology: 60 years gone astray? Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.
Valsiner, J. (2000). Culture and human development. An introduction. London: Sage.
Valsiner, J. (2007). Culture in minds and societies. Foundations of cultural psychology. Los Angeles: Sage.
von Bertalanffy, L. (Ed.). (1968). General systems theory. Foundations, development, applications. New York: George Braziller.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1926). Problema dominantnykh reakcii. (Problem of dominant reactions.). In K. N. Kornilov (Ed.), Problemy sovremennoi psikhologii (pp. 100–124). Leningrad: Gosudarstvennoje Izdatel’stvo.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1983). Problema umstvennoi otstalosti. (Problem of the mental retardation). In Russian. Originally published in 1935. In A. V. Zaporozhec (Ed.), L. S. Vygotsky. Sobranije sochinenii. Tom 5. Osnovy defektologii (pp. 231–256). Moscow: Pedagogika.
White, A. D. (1896). A history of the warfare of science with theology in Christendom (vol. 1). New York: D. Appleton and Company.
Wundt, W. (1897). Outlines of psychology. Leipzig: Wilhelm Engelman.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Toomela, A. (2014). A Structural Systemic Theory of Causality and Catalysis. In: Cabell, K., Valsiner, J. (eds) The Catalyzing Mind. Annals of Theoretical Psychology, vol 11. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8821-7_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8821-7_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-8820-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-8821-7
eBook Packages: Behavioral ScienceBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)