Skip to main content

Governance at Grassroots–Rhetoric and Reality: A Study of the Union Parishad in Bangladesh

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
In Search of Better Governance in South Asia and Beyond

Part of the book series: Public Administration, Governance and Globalization ((PAGG,volume 3))

Abstract

Advocates of decentralization in developing countries during the last decade have argued that bringing the government closer to the people will make it more responsive, pro-poor, and in general, enhance the quality of governance. Decentralization will also create a participatory framework to develop policies, which meet the needs of citizens, especially the “poor and disadvantaged.” During the last two decades, Bangladesh has piloted some projects to institutionalize the decentralization process and a mixed result has been observed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    UP is the village based and lowest level of Local government in Bangladesh. There are 4,502 UPs in Bangladesh with an average size of 33.3 km2 and an average population of 28,000 divided into nine wards composed of 15–18 villages. The UP is a rural elected government with 13 elected members; one from each of nine wards and three women members (from reserved seats—one from each of the three larger wards) along with a directly elected chairperson.

  2. 2.

    Article 59(1) provides that ‘Local Government in every administrative unit of the Republic shall be entrusted to bodies, composed of persons elected in accordance with law. Article 59(2) provides the broad functions of local government as: ‘administration and the work of public officers; the maintenance of public order; the preparation and implementation of plans relating to public services and economic development’. Article 60 stipulates that ‘For the purpose of giving full effect to the provisions of Article 59 Parliament shall by law, confer powers on the local government bodies referred to in that article, including power to impose taxes for local purposes, to prepare their budgets and to maintain funds.’ There were two more Constitutional provisions like Articles 9 and 11 which further consolidated the operational aspects of local government. These two Articles were later dropped under the 15th Constitutional amendment.

  3. 3.

    Sir Charles Metcalfe in Select Committee of the House of Commons noted that “The village communities are little republics, having nearly everything they can want within themselves, and almost independent of any foreign relations. They seem to last where nothing else lasts. Dynasty after dynasty tumbles down; revolution succeeds to revolution; but the village community remains the same.” Select Committee Proceedings Vol III, app 84, p. 331, 1832.

  4. 4.

    Saint Manu (ca 185–100) is respected and honored as an Indian spiritual leader and political historian. His main work is called Manu Sanhita or Manu Smriti.

  5. 5.

    Chanakya (c. 370–283 BCE) also known as Kautilya was an Indian philosopher and royal advisor. He wrote the classic political treatise called Arthaśāstra which is considered to be a classic document in the field of economics, government and political science in India.

  6. 6.

    http://hrba.undp.sk/index.php/introduction/local-governance-human-rights-based-approach-and-gender-mainstreaming-in-the-context-of-europe-and-the-cis/182-local-governance.

  7. 7.

    http://hrba.undp.sk/index.php/introduction/local-governance-human-rights-based-approach-and-gender-mainstreaming-in-the-context-of-europe-and-the-cis/182-local-governance.

  8. 8.

    Upazila is the second tier local government at the sub-district level. On average each Upazila has about 12 UPs. At present there are as many as 483 Upazilas in Bangladesh.

  9. 9.

    All 5-Year Plans of the Govt. of Bangladesh highlighted the need and importance of local government as the prime institution for revitalizing the rural hinterland of Bangladesh.

  10. 10.

    Indian local self-government was still in many ways a democratic façade to an autocratic structure. The actual conduct of the business was carried on by district officials…No proper system of local government evolved” Hugh Tinker (1954: 70).

  11. 11.

    Supra note 330, Kudrat e Elahi Case, Dhaka Law Review (Appellate Division) Volume 44.

  12. 12.

    Declining poor refers to those with less or no access to NGO services, formal service deliveries or credit services; limited ability to contribute to labor market and perpetual dependency on social charity and state support.

  13. 13.

    Upazila Nirbahi Officer (UNO) is the chief executive of the Upazila (Sub-district). He is also the focal point of the central government at the Upazila and coordinates all the line agency departments of the central government based at the Upazila. The UNO also acts as the member secretary of the Upazila Parishad (Sub-district Council).

  14. 14.

    Source: Aminuzzaman (2009c)

  15. 15.

    A survey was undertaken for this study in 23 Union Parishad in 12 districts covering all six divisions. As many as 385 adults (235 Males and 150 Females) were chosen through a purposive sampling.

  16. 16.

    UPs are broadly responsible for economic, social and community development. As set out in the Local Government UP Act 2009 have several functions including: Maintenance of law and order, including assistance to the law enforcement agencies and resolution of disputes; Adoption of measures to prevent disorder and smuggling; Conducting of censuses of all kinds; Registration of births, deaths, blind people, beggars and destitute; Planning and implementation of development schemes in the field of agriculture, forestry, fisheries, livestock, education, health, small and micro enterprises, communications, irrigation, and flood control; Implementation of other development schemes as assigned; Development and use of local resources; Motivation of people to use sanitary latrines; Promotion of family planning; Monitoring of development activities undertaken by different agencies (government, semi-government) in the Union; Protection and maintenance of public property such as roads, bridges, canals, embankments, markets, telephones, and electricity lines. In addition, specific rural infrastructure responsibilities defined for UPs are the maintenance of Rural Roads and the Planning and implementation of small construction projects, these include improvement of works on Rural Roads—for example, schemes under some food-aided infrastructure projects are implemented through the UPs. The UP is also responsible, through the union market management committees (UMMC) for the operation and maintenance of markets within the Union.

  17. 17.

    VGF is a part of the government Social Safety net programme. Under this program government of Bangladesh provide food and other basic needs to most vulnerable and marginal group like poor widow, aged and physically challenged and disadvantaged people during disaster.

  18. 18.

    VGD aims to promote self-reliance among the most vulnerable women, by providing them with food assistance and training for an alternative livelihood.

  19. 19.

    Test Relief is one of the social safety net programmes for the poorest section of the rural communities. The programme targets the poorest section of the rural areas who are landless, asset-less, unemployed and unskilled.

  20. 20.

    Field studies observed that rural people even the financially able ones are not happy with the performance of the UP. In general they consider that they do not get the real value for their money by the services being rendered by the UP (Aminuzzaman 2008).

  21. 21.

    Local Government Division (LGD), a department in the Ministry of Local Government, Rural Development, and Cooperatives

  22. 22.

    For each Union of an Upazila, there is a Union specific Tag Officer. The Tag Office is supposed to visit and monitor the activities of the respective Union and report back to Upazila Parishad.

  23. 23.

    UP complex is a planned physical structure with 14 office rooms including a small public hall. The UP Complex is the office of the UP. All UP based extension workers of the government are supposed to have their office in the complex. The Village Court is also formally located in the UP complex. At present there are 2,518 UP complexes and another 525 are under construction within the current financial year.

  24. 24.

    Also see—Sen’s Capability Approach, http://www.iep.utm.edu/sen-cap/#H1.

References

  • Ahmed J (2007) Local governments: international experiences. Paper presented at the national workshop on strengthening of local government institutions, National Institute of Local Government, Dhaka. 20 March 2007

    Google Scholar 

  • Akash MM (2011) ShtahneoSarkarer budget—Akti bishleshon. (A review of budget allocations for local government in Bangladesh, Seminar paper in Bangla). Governance Coalition, Dhaka

    Google Scholar 

  • Akash MM (2009) Prostabito budget O ShtahneoSarkar :Trinomuler Jonogoner Prottasha (Proposed budget 2008–2009 and local government: expectation of the grass roots people (A research paper in Bangla). Governance Coalition, Dhaka

    Google Scholar 

  • Aminuzzaman S (2008) Institutional strengthening of UP: observations from the field, seminar paper presented to the annual conference of Bangladesh Union Parishad Forum. BMA Auditorium, Dhaka, 28 March

    Google Scholar 

  • Aminuzzaman S (2007) Stakeholder perspective on local governance in Bangladesh: capturing the military’s perspective. World Bank, Dhaka

    Google Scholar 

  • Aminuzzaman S (2009a) Local government and development in Bangladesh: lessons learned and challenges for improving service delivery of Union Parishad. Paper presented to the national workshop entitled, how to improve the service delivery of Union Parishad (UP), held at Bangabondhu International Conference Center, Dec 12–13th 2009, LG division, Ministry of local government, Rural development and cooperatives and UNDP

    Google Scholar 

  • Aminuzzaman S (2009b) Governance and politics—a study on the interface of UP, NGO and local actors. Institute for Environment and Development, Dhaka

    Google Scholar 

  • Aminuzzaman S (2009c) Poor peoples’ perception of UP. A diagnostic study. Department of Public Administration, University of Dhaka, Dhaka

    Google Scholar 

  • Aminuzzaman S (2011a) Learning and innovation of local government development interventions: challenges of its institutionalization. Paper presented to national seminar on local governance jointly organized by UNDP and LG division, Ministry of local government, Rural development and cooperatives and UNDP

    Google Scholar 

  • Aminuzzaman S (2011b) Governance mapping: a study of the pro-poor governance in rural Bangladesh. Paper presented to the international conference on 40 years of Bangladesh: Retrospect and future prospects. Institute of Governance Studies, BRAC University in collaboration with CDS, University of Bath, 26–28 Nov 2011

    Google Scholar 

  • Aminuzzaman S (2011c) Local governance innovations: an assessment of the challenges for mainstreaming local governance support program. In: Jamil I, Aminuzzaman SA, Askvik S, Haque STM (eds) Understanding governance and public policy in Bangladesh. MPPG Program, North South University, Dhaka

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakker K (2003) Good governance in restructuring water supply: a handbook. Federation of Canadian Municipalities, Ottawa

    Google Scholar 

  • Banerjea P (1916) Public administration in ancient India. MacMillan and Co. Limited, London

    Google Scholar 

  • General Economics Division (GED) (2009) National strategy for accelerated poverty reduction II FY 2009–11. General economics division, planning commission, government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh, Aug 2009

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of Bangladesh GOB (2011) Sixth five year plan FY 2011-2015. General economics division, planning commission. Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh

    Google Scholar 

  • Hossain ZR (2006) Actors and roles, community capacities and local governance. Power and Participatory Research Centre, Dhaka

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarney PL (ed) (1996) Cities and governance: new directions in Latin America, Asia and Africa. Centre for Urban and Community Studies University of Toronto, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohammed SN (2010) People’s participation in development projects at grass-root level: a case study of Alampur and Jagannathpur Union Parishad. Master’s Thesis, MPPG Program, Department of General and Continuing Education, North South University, Bangladesh

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen HB (2007) Decentralization and local governance: definition and concept. http://www.deza.admin.ch/ressources/resource_en_167288.pdf

  • Pandey KP, Asaduzzaman M (2011) Politics, problems and trends of decentralized local governance in Bangladesh. In: Jamil I et al (eds) Understanding governance and public policy in Bangladesh. MPPG Program, North South University, Dhaka

    Google Scholar 

  • Resnick D, Birner R (2006) Does good governance contribute to pro-poor growth? a review of the evidence from cross-country studies. Discussion Paper 30, International Food Policy Research Institute (lFPRI)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudra N, Sardesai S (2009) Political analysis of decentralization: capturing the stakeholder perspective lessons from the bangladesh study. World Bank, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen A (1999) Development as freedom. Oxford University Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah A (ed) (2006) Local governance in industrial countries. World Bank, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Shotton R (2004) Local government initiative: pro-poor infrastructure and service delivery in rural Asia—a synthesis of case studies. UNCDF, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinker H (1954) The foundation of local self-government in India, Pakistan and Burma. University of London, Athlone Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams M, McLean K, Kerr G (1998) Decentralization and Rural Development: characterizing efforts in nineteen countries. World Bank Draft paper. World Bank, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Salahuddin M. Aminuzzaman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Aminuzzaman, S.M. (2013). Governance at Grassroots–Rhetoric and Reality: A Study of the Union Parishad in Bangladesh. In: Jamil, I., Askvik, S., Dhakal, T. (eds) In Search of Better Governance in South Asia and Beyond. Public Administration, Governance and Globalization, vol 3. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7372-5_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics