Skip to main content

Mainstream Psychology

  • Reference work entry
Encyclopedia of Critical Psychology

Introduction

Every concept is simultaneously defined in two ways; the positive aspect of a definition contains understanding of what characterizes the thing referred to by the concept. (For brevity, “thing” is used to denote any distinguishable aspect of reality.) The negative aspect, in turn, contains understanding of what is notreferred to by the concept. So, in respect to the list of qualities defining a concept, there must always be something that is not characterized by the same list of qualities. Qualities that characterize a thing X and its opposite, non-X, are not defining and should therefore not be components of a definition. Further, it is important that the world can be distinguished into things at different levels of analysis and in different perspectives. Therefore, every definition is specific to a level and perspective, that is, context. These ideas need to be taken into account in defining mainstream psychology (MP), which necessarily entails the existence of...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anokhin, P. K. (1975). Ocherki po fiziologii funktsional’nykh sistem. Moscow: Medicina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comte, A. (1875). Positive philosophy. In H. Martineau (Ed.), The positive philosophy of Auguste Comte. In two volumes (Vol. 2, pp. 1–467). London: Trübner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comte, A. (1893). Positive philosophy. In H. Martineau (Ed.), The positive philosophy of Auguste Comte. In two volumes (Vol. 1, pp. 1–397). London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO five-factor inventory (NEO-FFI). Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J. A. (1983). The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, T. L. (1927). Interpretation of educational measurements. Yonkers-on-Hudson, NY: World Book.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koffka, K. (1935). Principles of Gestalt psychology. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed., Enlarged). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, M. W. (2000). Levine and Shefner’s fundamentals of sensation and perception (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michell, J. (2000). Normal science, pathological science and psychometrics. Theory & Psychology, 10, 639–667.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michell, J. (2010). The quantity/quality interchange: A blind spot on the highway of science. In A. Toomela & J. Valsiner (Eds.), Methodological thinking in psychology: 60 years gone astray? (pp. 45–68). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molenaar, P. C. M. (2004). A Manifesto on psychology as idiographic science: Bringing the person back into scientific psychology, this time forever. Measurement, 2, 201–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurstone, L. L. (1935). The vectors of mind: Multiple-factor analysis for the isolation of primary traits. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Titchener, E. B. (1898). Postulates of structural psychology. Philosophical Review, 7, 449–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Titchener, E. B. (1899). Structural and functional psychology. Philosophical Review, 8, 290–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Titchener, E. B. (1910). A text-book of psychology. New York: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toomela, A. (2007a). Culture of science: Strange history of the methodological thinking in psychology. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 41, 6–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Toomela, A. (2007b). Unifying psychology: Absolutely necessary, not only useful. In A. V. B. Bastos & N. M. D. Rocha (Eds.), Psicologia: Novas direcoes no dialogo com outros campos de saber (pp. 449–464). Sao Paulo: Casa do Psicologo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toomela, A. (2008a). Kurt Lewin’s contribution to the methodology of psychology: From past to future skipping the present. In J. Clegg (Ed.), The observation of human systems. Lessons from the history of anti-reductionistic empirical psychology (pp. 101–116). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toomela, A. (2008b). Variables in psychology: A critique of quantitative psychology. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 42, 245–265.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Toomela, A. (2010a). Methodology of idiographic science: Limits of single-case studies and the role of typology. In S. Salvatore, J. Valsiner, J. T. Simon, & A. Gennaro (Eds.), Yearbook of idiographic science, volume 2/2009 (pp. 13–33). Rome: Firera & Liuzzo Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toomela, A. (2010b). Poverty of modern mainstream psychology in autobiography. Reflections on a history of psychology in autobiography, volume IX. Culture and Psychology, 16, 127–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toomela, A. (2010c). Quantitative methods in psychology: Inevitable and useless. Frontiers in Quantitative Psychology and Measurement, 1(29), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toomela, A. (2010d). What is the psyche? The answer depends on the particular epistemology adopted by the scholar. In S. Salvatore, J. Valsiner, J. T. Simon, & A. Gennaro (Eds.), Yearbook of idiographic science, volume 2/2009 (pp. 81–104). Rome: Firera & Liuzzo Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toomela, A. (2011). Travel into a fairy land: A critique of modern qualitative and mixed methods psychologies. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 45, 21–47.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Toomela, A. (2012). Guesses on the future of cultural psychology: Past, present, and past. In J. Valsiner (Ed.), The oxford handbook of culture and psychology (pp. 998–1033). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toomela, A., & Valsiner, J. (Eds.). (2010). Methodological thinking in psychology: 60 years gone astray? Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tulving, E. (2000). Concepts of memory. In E. Tulving & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), The oxford handbook of memory (pp. 33–43). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1926). Pedagogicheskaja psikhologija. Kratkii kurs. (Educational psychology. A short course). Moscow: Rabotnik Prosveschenija.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1982). Istoricheski smysl psikhologicheskogo krizisa. Metodologicheskoje issledovanije. (Historical meaning of the crisis in psychology. A methodological study. Originally written in 1927; First published in 1982). In A. R. Luria, & M. G. Jaroshevskii (Eds.), L. S. Vygotsky. Sobranije sochinenii. Tom 1. Voprosy teorii i istorii psikhologii (pp. 291–436). Moscow: Pedagogika.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, G. (1934). Psychology in Germany and Austria. Psychological Bulletin, 31, 755–776.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmer, H. D., Mecklinger, A., & Lindenberger, U. (Eds.). (2006). Handbook of binding and memory. Perspectives from cognitive neuroscience. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aaro Toomela .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this entry

Cite this entry

Toomela, A. (2014). Mainstream Psychology. In: Teo, T. (eds) Encyclopedia of Critical Psychology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5583-7_667

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5583-7_667

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-5582-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-5583-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics