Skip to main content

Circuits of Dispossession and Privilege

  • Reference work entry
Encyclopedia of Critical Psychology

Introduction

How do histories and structures of cumulative disadvantage and privilege seep into the social psychological landscapes of children, youth, and adults? This is a profoundly important question of epistemology, theory, and design for researchers who are committed to documenting the everyday collateral damage of and emergent collective resistance to the wave of swelling inequality gaps, neoliberal transformations of state and capital, global movements of bodies, and government declarations of austerity surrounding us today.

As a provisional response to this question of design, Michelle Fine and Jessica Ruglis (2008) offer the concept circuits of dispossession and privilege as a conceptual framework for studying how structural injustice moves under the skin of privileged and marginalized individuals. Contesting the simplicity of social determinism andnaïve individualism, a circuits analysis recognizes that growing up in the vortex of inequality gaps fundamentally shapes (but...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bhatia, S. (2012). Lost in translation: Cultural hybridity, acculturation, and human development. Human Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billies, M. (2010). PAR method: Journey to a participatory conscientization. International Review of Qualitative Research, 3(3), 355–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cahill, C. (2010). “Why do they hate us?” Reframing immigration through participatory action research. Area, 42(2), 152–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Du Bois, W. E. B. (1899). The Philadelphia Negro: A social study. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, M., & Ruglis, J. (2008). Circuits of dispossession: The racialized and classed realignment of the public sphere for youth in the U.S. Transforming Anthropology, 17(1), 20–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, M., & Fine, M. (2012). Circulating critical research: Reflections on performance and moving inquiry into action. In G. Cannella & S. Steinberg (Eds.), Critical qualitative research reader. NY: Peter Lang Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacking, I. (1995). The looping effect of human kinds. In D. Sperber et al. (Eds.), Causal cognition: An interdisciplinary approach (pp. 351–383). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (2004). A geographer’s perspective on the new American imperialism: Conversations with history. Berkeley, CA: UC Institute of International Studies. Electronic document. Accessed May 10, 2007, from http://globetrotter.berkeley.edu/people4/Harvey/harvey-con0.html

  • Jahoda, M., Lazarsfeld, P., & Zeisel, H. (1933). Marienthal: The sociography of an unemployed community. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, C. (2004). Growing up global. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebert, R. (2010). Synaptic peace-keeping: Of bipolar and securitization. Women's Studies Quarterly Special Issue, Market, 38(3&4), 325–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebert, R. J. (2012). A progressive downward spiral. Journal of theoretical and philosophical psychology, 26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, W. (2012). The dispossession of needs in neoliberal globalization: Life stories of Southeast Asian migrant workers in Taiwan. Manuscript in preparation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luttrell, W. (2003). Pregnant bodies, fertile minds. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, S. (2010). Intimate justice. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(9), 663–680.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muñoz Proto, C, & Opotow, S. (2012). Marching to resist injustice, acting to foster peace: Studying the World March for Peace and Nonviolence. In M. Deutsch, & P. Coleman (Eds.), Psychologys contributions to the study and practice of sustainable peace. New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saegert, S., Fields, D., & Libman, K. (2009). Deflating the dream: Radical risk and the neoliberalization of homeownership. Journal of Urban Affairs, 31(3), 297–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sirin, S., & Fine, M. (2008). Muslim American Youth. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L. T. (2012). Decolonizing methodology. London: Zed publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoudt, B., Fine, M., & Fox, M. (2012). Growing up policed in the age of aggressive policing policies. New York Law School Law Review. 56, 2011/12, 1330–1352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teo, T. (2011). Empirical race psychology and the hermeneutics of epistemological violence. Human Studies, 34(3), 237–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torre, M., Fine, M., Stoudt, B., & Fox, M. (2012). Critical participatory action research as public science. In H. Cooper & P. Camic (Eds.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology. Washington DC: APA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, R., & Pickett, K. (2009). The spirit level: Why greater equality makes societies stronger. New York: Bloomsbury Press.

    Google Scholar 

Online Resources

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michelle Fine .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this entry

Cite this entry

Fine, M. (2014). Circuits of Dispossession and Privilege. In: Teo, T. (eds) Encyclopedia of Critical Psychology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5583-7_41

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5583-7_41

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-5582-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-5583-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics