Skip to main content

Participatory Action Research

  • Reference work entry
Encyclopedia of Critical Psychology

Introduction

Rooted in notions of democracy and social justice and drawing on critical theory (feminist, critical race, queer, disability, neo-Marxist, indigenous, and/or post-structural), the term participatory action research refers to an epistemology that engages research design, methods, analyses, and products through a lens of democratic participation and collective action.

Definition

Participatory action research (PAR) is an approach to research committed to democratic principles of justice and equality. It is an inclusive practice of research defined both by participation and a determination to produce knowledge in the interest of social change. While often regarded as simply a method, PAR is actually an epistemological stance that values knowledge produced from lived experience as equal to that produced in the academy and, in so doing, expands traditional notions of expertise. In expanding what counts as “expertise,” PAR also extends “the right to research” (Appadurai, 2006)...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Addams, J. (Ed.) (1896). Hull-house maps and papers: A presentation of nationalities and wages in a congested district of Chicago, together with comments and essays on problems growing out of the social conditions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allport, G. W. (1951). [Foreword]. In M. H. Wormser & C. Selltiz (Eds.), How to conduct a self-survey of civil rights. New York: Association Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appadurai, A. (2006). The right to research. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 4(2), 167–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cahill, C., Sultana, F., Pain, R. (Eds.). (2007). Special issue: Participatory ethics. ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies 6, 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherry, F., & Borshuk, C. (1998). Social action research and the commission on community interrelations. Journal of Social Issues, 54(1), 119–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, B., & Kothari, U. (2001). Participation: The new Tyranny? London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • DuBois, W. E. B. (1898). The study of the Negro problems. Philadelphia: American Academy of Political and Social Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fals Borda, O. (1977). Por la praxis: El problema de cómo investigar la realidad para transformarla. In O. Fals-Borda (Ed.), Crítica y Política en Ciencias Sociales. Bogotá, Colombia: Punta de Lanza.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fals Borda, O., & Rahman, M. A. (1991). Introduction in action and knowledge: Breaking the monopoly with participatory action-research (pp. 3–34). New York: The Apex Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Herder and Herder.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gramsci, A. (1971). Prison notebooks. New York: International Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2(4), 34–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, H. M. (2006). Participatory research and education for social change: Highlander research and education center. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research, concise paperback edition (pp. 262–268). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torre, M. E. (2005). The alchemy of integrated spaces: Youth participation in research collectives of difference. In L. Weis & M. Fine (Eds.), Beyond silenced voices (pp. 251–266). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torre, M. E., & Fine, M. (2011). A wrinkle in time: Tracing a legacy of public science through community self-surveys and participatory action research. Journal of Social Issues, 67(1), 106–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torre, M. E., Fine, M., Stoudt, B., & Fox, M. (2012). Critical participatory action research as public science. In P. Camic & H. Cooper (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research in psychology: Expanding perspectives in methodology and design (2nd ed., pp. 171–184). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wormser, M. H., & Selltiz, C. (1951). How to conduct a self-survey of civil rights. New York: Association Press.

    Google Scholar 

Online Resources

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to María Elena Torre .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this entry

Cite this entry

Torre, M.E. (2014). Participatory Action Research. In: Teo, T. (eds) Encyclopedia of Critical Psychology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5583-7_211

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5583-7_211

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-5582-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-5583-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics