Abstract
This chapter is about theories of work-related stress. Of course, throughout this Handbook, stress-related topics are discussed. However, in order to understand different theories and to give them a sense of time, place, and meaning, we attempt to explore them against the changes in how stress has come to be defined. The importance of exploring stress theories in this way lies in the way it gives a sense of history: of why different theories prevailed (Cooper, Dewe, & O’Driscoll, 2001), whether they are “worthy of the intellectual resources focused on them” (Kaplan, 1996, p. 374), whether they adequately express the nature of the experience itself (Newton, 1995) and, despite the knowledge and understanding they have provided, whether they are still capable of expressing “the stress of the stress process” (Lazarus, 1990, p. 4). We also explore whether we can distil from them what should now become the organizing concept of the future around which such theories should focus. Liddle (1994) describes an organizing concept as one with “sufficient logic and emotional resonance to yield systematic theoretical and research enquiry that will make a lasting solution” (p. 167). Finally, we explore the different theories in terms of how they have influenced our measurement strategies, where our current methodologies are taking us, what this means for understanding the richness of the stress experience, and the type of evidence they provide in terms of work stress and well-being. However, this chapter does not review all the different theories of stress. In order to explore how they have evolved, we have selected a number that best express this evolutionary process, although all theories have an evolutionary element to them. A comprehensive review of stress theories can be found in Cooper (2000). This book is as “a compendium of theory rich in diversity and range” (p. 4) emphasising not just the need for theories to capture the essence of the work experience itself, but also help us as researchers fulfil our moral responsibility to those whose working lives we study. This chapter begins by first exploring the evolutionary milestones in the way stress has been defined. It then uses this as the context for exploring the development of selected stress theories. The chapter concludes by exploring what this means in terms of our understanding of work stress, those elements that should now be reflected in our theories of stress and the issues we now need to consider as researchers and practitioners.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aldwin, C. M. (2000). Stress, coping, and development: An integrative perspective. New York: The Guilford Press.
Beehr, T. A., Glaser, K. M., Canali, K. G., & Wallwey, D. A. (2001). Back to basics: Re-examination of the demand-control theory of occupational stress. Work and Stress, 15(115–130).
Brief, A. P., & George, J. M. (1991). Psychological stress and the workplace: A brief comment on Lazarus’ outlook. In P. L. Perrewé (Ed.). Handbook on job stress [Special Issue]. Journal of Social Behaviour and Personality, 6, 15–20.
Cavanaugh, M. A., Boswell, W. R., Roehling, M. V., & Boudreau, J. W. (2000). An empirical examination of self-reported work stress among U.S. managers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 65–74.
Cooper, C. L. (Ed.). (2000). Theories of stress. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cooper, C. L., Dewe, P., & O’Driscoll, M. (2001). Organizational Stress: A review and critique of theory, research, and applications. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Coyne, J. C. (1997). Improving coping research: Raze the slum before any more building! Journal of Health Psychology, 2, 153–155.
Coyne, J. C., & Gottlieb, B. H. (1996). The mismeasure of coping by checklist. Journal of Personality, 64, 959–991.
Cranford, J. A. (2004). Stress-buffering or stress-exacerbation? Social support and social undermining as moderators of the relationship between perceived stress and depressive symptoms among married people. Personal Relationships, 11(1), 23–40.
Cummings, T. G., & Cooper, C. L. (1979). Cybernetic framework for studying occupational stress. Minneapolis: Minnesota Press.
Cummings, T. G., & Cooper, C. L. (2000). A cybernetic theory of organizational stress. In C. L. Cooper (Ed.), Theories of stress (pp. 101–121). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Daniels, K., Beesley, N., Cheyne, A., & Wimalasiri, V. (2008). Coping processes linking the demands-control-support model, affect and risky decisions at work. Human Relations, 61(6), 845–874.
Dawis, R. V., & Lofquist, L. H. (1984). A psychological theory of work adjustment. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Dewe, P. (2001). Work stress, coping and well-being: implementing strategies to better understand the relationship. In P. Perrewe & D. Ganster (Eds.), Research in occupational stress and well-being: Exploring theoretical mechanisms and perspectives 1 (pp. 63–96). Amsterdam: JAI Press.
Dewe, P. (2003). A closer examination of the patterns when coping with work-related stress: Implications for measurement. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 76, 517–524.
Dewe, P., & Ng, A. (1999). Exploring the relationship between primary appraisal and coping using a work setting. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 14, 397–418.
Dewe, P., O’Driscoll, M., & Cooper, C. (2010). Coping with work stress: A review and critique. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Edwards, J. R. (1995). Alternatives to difference scores as dependent variables in the study of congruence in organizational research. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 64, 307–324.
Edwards, J. R. (2000). Cybernetic theory of stress, coping and well-being. In C. L. Cooper (Ed.), Theories of stress (pp. 122–152). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Folkman, S. (2011). Stress, health, and coping: Synthesis, commentary, and future directions. In S. Folkman (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of stress, health, and coping (pp. 453–462). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Folkman, S., & Lazarus, R. S. (1980). An analysis of coping in a middle-aged community sample. Journal of Health and Social Behaviour, 21, 219–239.
Folkman, S., & Moskowitz, J. T. (2004). Coping: Pitfalls and promise. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 745–774.
Frese, M., & Zapf, D. (1999). On the importance of the objective environment in stress and attribution theory. Counterpoint to Perrewe and Zellars. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20, 761–765.
Hakanen, J. J., Perhoniemi, R., & Toppinen-Tanner, S. (2008). Positive gain spirals at work: From job resources to work engagement, personal initiative and work-unit innovativeness. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 73(1), 78–91.
Halbesleben, J. R. B. (2006). Sources of social support and burnout: A meta-analytic test of the conservation of resources model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(5), 1134–1145.
Hobfoll, S. E. (2001). The influence of culture, community and the nested-self in the stress process: Advancing conservation of resources theory. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 50, 337–421.
Holroyd, K., & Lazarus, R. (1982). Stress, coping and somatic adaptation. In L. Goldberger & S. Breznitz (Eds.), Handbook of stress: Theoretical and clinical aspects (pp. 21–35). New York: Free Press.
Johnson, J., & Hall, E. (1988). Job strain, work place social support and cardiovascular disease: A cross-sectional study of a random sample of the working population. American Journal of Public Health, 78, 1336–1342.
Kaplan, H. (1996). Themes, lacunae and directions in research on psychological stress. In H. Kaplan (Ed.), Psychosocial stress: Perspectives on structure, theory, life courses and methods (pp. 369–401). New York: Academic.
Karasek, R. A. (1979). Job demands, job decision latitude and mental strain: Implications for job redesign. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 285–308.
Karasek, R. A., & Theorell, T. (1990). Healthy work: Stress, productivity and the reconstruction of working life. New York: Basic Books.
Kickul, J., & Posig, M. (2001). Supervisory social support and burnout: An explanation of reverse buffering effects. Journal of Managerial Issues, 13, 328–344.
King, D. W., King, L. A., Foy, D. W., Keane, T. M., & Fairbank, J. A. (1999). Post-traumatic stress disorder in a national sample of male and female Vietnam veterans: Risk factors, war-zone stressors and resilience-recovery variables. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 108, 164–170.
Lazarus, R. S. (1990). Theory based stress measurement. Psychological Inquiry, 1, 3–12.
Lazarus, R. S. (1999). Stress and emotion: a new synthesis. London: Free Association.
Lazarus, R. S. (2000). Toward better research on stress and coping. American Psychologist, 55, 665–673.
Lazarus, R. S. (2001). Relational meaning and discrete emotions. In K. Scherer, A. Schorr, & T. Johnstone (Eds.), Appraisal processes in emotion: Theory, methods, research (pp. 37–67). New York: Oxford University Press.
Lazarus, R. S., & Cohen-Charash, Y. (2001). Discrete emotions in organizational life. In R. Payne & C. Cooper (Eds.), Emotions at work: theory, research and applications for management (pp. 45–81). Chichester: John Wiley.
Liddle, H. A. (1994). Contextualizing resiliency. In M. C. Wong & E. W. Gordon (Eds.), Educational resilience in inner-city America (pp. 167–177). Hillsdale, N.Y.: Earlbaum.
Lowe, R., & Bennett, P. (2003). Exploring coping reactions to work stress: application of an appraisal theory. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 676, 393–400.
Luszczynska, A., & Cieslak, R. (2005). Protective, promotive, and buffering effects of perceived social support in managerial stress: The moderating role of personality. Anxiety, Stress and Coping, 18(3), 227–244.
Murray, H. (1938). Explorations in personality. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
Nelson, D. L., & Simmons, B. L. (2003). Health psychology and work stress: A more positive approach. In J. C. Quick & L. E. Tetrick (Eds.), Handbook of occupational psychology (pp. 97–119). Washington, DC: American Psychological Society.
Nelson, D. L., & Simmons, B. L. (2004). Eustress: An elusive construct, an engaging pursuit. In P. L. Perrewe & D. C. Ganster (Eds.), Research in occupational stress and well being (Vol. 3, pp. 265–322). Amsterdam: Elsevier JAL.
Newton, T. (1995). Managing’ stress: Emotion and power at work. London: Sage.
Panatik, S. A., O’Driscoll, M. P., & Anderson, M. H. (2011). Job demands and employee work-related psychological responses among Malaysian technical workers: The moderating effects of self-efficacy. Work and Stress, 25(4), 355–371.
Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Salanova, M. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(4), 701–716.
Shirom, A., Toker, S., Berliner, S., & Shapira, I. (2008). The job demand-control-support model and stress-related low-grade inflammatory responses among healthy employees: A longitudinal study. Work and Stress, 22(2), 138–152.
Shupe, E. I., & McGrath, J. E. (2000). Stress and the sojourner. In C. L. Cooper (Ed.), Theories of stress (pp. 86–100). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Siegrist, J. (2009). Job control and reward: Effects on well-being. In S. Cartwright & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of organizational well-being (pp. 109–132). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Simmons, B. L., & Nelson, D. L. (2007). Eustress at work: Extending the holistic stress model. In D. L. Nelson & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), Positive organizational behaviour (pp. 40–53). London: Sage.
Somerfield, M., & McCrae, R. (2000). Stress and coping research: Methodological challenges, theoretical advances. American Psychologist, 55, 620–625.
Tennen, H., Affleck, G., Armeli, S., & Carney, M. (2000). A daily process approach to coping. American Psychologist, 55, 626–636.
Wall, T., Jackson, P., Mullarkey, S., & Parker, S. (1996). The demands-control model of job strain: A more specific test. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 69, 153–166.
Warr, P. B. (2007). Work, happiness and unhappiness. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Warr, P. B., & Clapperton, G. (2010). The joy of work: Jobs, happiness, and you. London: Routledge.
Wethington, E. (2000). Theories of organizational stress: Book review. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 640–642.
Xanthopoulou, D., Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2009). Reciprocal relationships between job resources, personal resources, and work engagement. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 74(3), 235.
Yang, L.-Q., Hongsheng, C., & Spector, P. E. (2008). Job stress and well-being: An examination from the view of person-environment fit. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 81(3), 567–587.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dewe, P.J., O’Driscoll, M.P., Cooper, C.L. (2012). Theories of Psychological Stress at Work. In: Gatchel, R., Schultz, I. (eds) Handbook of Occupational Health and Wellness. Handbooks in Health, Work, and Disability. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4839-6_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4839-6_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-4838-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-4839-6
eBook Packages: Behavioral ScienceBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)