Synonyms
Basic dimensions of democracy; Coevolution; Conceptualization of democracy; Democracy; Democracy, Theory; Democratic innovation; Democratizing innovation; Development; Innovation of democracy; Innovative democracy; Knowledge democracy; Model of quadruple helix structures; Quadruple helix; Quadruple helix structure of democracy; Quadruple-dimensional structure of democracy; Quality of democracy; Sustainable development
The Conceptual Definition of Democracy and of the Quality of Democracy
How can democracy and the quality of democracy be conceptualized? Such a (theoretically justified) conceptualization is necessary in order for democracy and the quality of democracy to be subjected to a democracy measurement, whereby democracy measurement, in this case, can be examined along the lines of conceptually defining democracy (thus democracy measurement is also to be utilized to improve the theory of democracy) (see Campbell 2012). Hans-Joachim Lauth (2004, pp. 32–101) suggests in...
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Campbell DFJ. The basic concept for the democracy ranking of the quality of democracy. Vienna: Democracy Ranking (2008). http://www.democracyranking.org/downloads/basic_concept_democracy_ranking_2008_A4.pdf. Accessed 1 Dec 2012.
Campbell DFJ. Die österreichische Demokratiequalität in Perspektive. In Helms L, Wineroither DM, editors. Die österreichische Demokratie im Vergleich. Baden-Baden: Nomos; 2012.
Campbell DFJ, Sükösd M, editors. Feasibility study for a quality ranking of democracies. Vienna: Global Democracy Award (2002). http://www.democracyranking.org/downloads/feasibility_study-a4-e-01.pdf. Accessed 1 Dec 2012.
Campbell DFJ, Barth TD. Wie können Demokratie und Demokratiequalität gemessen werden? Modelle, Demokratie-Indices und Länderbeispiele im globalen Vergleich. SWS-Rundschau. 2009;49(2):208–33. http://www.sws-rundschau.at/archiv/SWS_2009_2_Campbell.pdf and http://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/View/?resid=12471.
Carayannis EG, Campbell DFJ. “Mode 3” and “Quadruple Helix”: toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem. Int J Technol Manag. 2009;46(3/4):201–34. http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=27&year=2009&vol=46&issue=3/4 and http://www.inderscience.com/search/index.php?action=record&rec_id=23374&prevQuery=&ps=10&m=or.
Carayannis EG, Campbell DFJ. Triple helix, quadruple helix and quintuple helix and how do knowledge, innovation and the environment relate to each other? A proposed framework for a trans-disciplinary analysis of sustainable development and social ecology. Int J Soc Ecol Sustain Dev. 2010;1(1):41–69. http://www.igi-global.com/bookstore/article.aspx?titleid=41959.
Carayannis EG, Campbell DFJ. Open innovation diplomacy and a 21st century fractal research, education and innovation (FREIE) ecosystem: building on the quadruple and quintuple helix innovation concepts and the “Mode 3” knowledge production system. J Knowl Econ. 2011;2(3):327–72. http://www.springerlink.com/content/d1lr223321305579/.
Carayannis EG, Campbell DFJ. Mode 3 knowledge production in quadruple helix innovation systems. 21st-century democracy, innovation, and entrepreneurship for development, Springer briefs in business, vol. 7. New York: Springer; 2012. http://www.springer.com/business+%26+management/book/978-1-4614-2061-3.
Carayannis EG, Barth TD, Campbell DFJ. The quintuple helix innovation model: global warming as a challenge and driver for innovation. J Innov Entrep. 2012;1(1):1–12. http://www.innovation-entrepreneurship.com/content/pdf/2192-5372-1-2.pdf.
Dahl RA. Polyarchy. Participation and opposition. New Haven: Yale University Press; 1971.
Danilda I, Lindberg M, Torstensson B-M. Women Resource Centres. A quattro helix innovation system on the European agenda (2009). Paper http://www.hss09.se/own_documents/Papers/3-11%20-%20Danilda%20Lindberg%20&%20Torstensson%20-%20paper.pdf. Accessed 1 Dec 2012.
Diamond L, Morlino L. The quality of democracy. An overview. J Democr. 2004;15(4):20–31.
Diamond L, Morlino L, editors. Assessing the quality of democracy. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press; 2005.
Downs A. An economic theory of democracy. Boston: Addison-Wesley; 1957.
Etzkowitz H, Leydesdorff L. The dynamics of innovation: from national systems and “Mode 2” to a triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Res Policy. 2000;29:109–23.
European Commission. The world in 2025. Rising Asia and socio-ecological transition. Brussels: European Commission (2009). http://ec.europa.eu/research/social-sciences/pdf/the-world-in-2025-report_en.pdf. Accessed 1 Dec 2012.
Fischer-Kowalski M, Haberl H, editors. Socioecological transitions and global change. Trajectories of social metabolism and land use. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar; 2007.
Freedom House. Freedom in the world 2011. Methodology. Washington, DC: Freedom House (2011a). http://www.freedomhouse.org/template.cfm?page=351&ana_page=379&year=2011. Accessed 1 Dec 2012.
Freedom House. Freedom in the world – population trends. Washington, DC: Freedom House (2011b). http://www.freedomhouse.org/images/File/fiw/historical/PopulationTrendsFIW1980-2011.pdf. Accessed 1 Dec 2012.
Harding S, Phillips D, Fogarty M. Contrasting values in Western Europe. Unity, diversity and change, Studies in the contemporary values of modern society. London: Macmillan; 1986.
Helms L. Die Institutionalisierung der liberalen Demokratie. Deutschland im internationalen Vergleich. Frankfurt: Campus; 2007.
Lauth H-J. Demokratie und Demokratiemessung. Eine konzeptionelle Grundlegung für den interkulturellen Vergleich. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften; 2004.
Marshall TH. Class, citizenship, and social development. Essays. Garden City: Doubleday; 1964.
Munck GL. Measuring democracy. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press; 2009.
O’Donnell G. Human development, human rights, and democracy. In: O’Donnell G, Vargas Cullell J, Iazzetta OM, editors. The quality of democracy. Theory and applications. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press; 2004a. p. 9–92.
O’Donnell G. Why the rule of law matters. J Democr. 2004b;15(4):32–46.
Przeworski A, Alvarez ME, Antonio Cheibub J, Limongi F. Democracy and development. Political institutions and well-being in the world, 1950–1990. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2003.
Saward M, editor. Democratic innovation. Deliberation, representation and association. London: Routledge; 2000.
Sodaro MJ. Comparative politics. A global introduction. Boston: Mc Graw Hill; 2004.
Stoiber M. Die Qualität von Demokratien im Vergleich Zur Bedeutung des Kontextes in der empirisch vergleichenden Demokratietheorie. Nomos: Baden-Baden; 2011.
UNDP/United Nations Development Program. Human development report 2000. Human rights and human development. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2000. http://hdr.undp.org/en/reports/global/hdr2000/.
Von Hippel E. Democratizing innovation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2005.
Winiwarter V, Knoll M. Umweltgeschichte. Cologne: Böhlau; 2007.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media LLC
About this entry
Cite this entry
Campbell, D.F.J., Carayannis, E.G. (2013). Quality of Democracy and Innovation. In: Carayannis, E.G. (eds) Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3858-8_509
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3858-8_509
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-3857-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-3858-8
eBook Packages: Business and Economics