Skip to main content

Linguistic Dimension of Creativity, Invention, Innovation, and Entrepreneurship

  • Reference work entry
Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship

Synonyms

Business discourse; Creativity, invention, innovation and entrepreneurship, discourse; English, a global language; Entrepreneurs’ discourse; Global language; Innovation through language; Linguistic identity; Linguistic managing through innovation; Linguistic side of business performance; Organizational linguistic identity

Introduction

The spheres of creativity, invention, innovation, and entrepreneurship are strictly related with the life and performance of organizations. Companies have to be creative, inventive, innovative, and entrepreneurial if they want to be competitive and prosperous on the modern market (Carayannis and Chanaron 2007). Due to the variety of products and services offered by the business entities in most industry sectors, it is mainly knowledge of gloCal (global and local) character (Carayannis and von Zedtwitz 2005) that makes the company outstanding among similar organizations and enhances its market attractiveness. Although companies have to search...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 1,100.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Appadurai A. Nowoczesność bez Granic. Kulturowe Wymiary Globalizacji. Cracow: Universitas; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Badaracco J. The knowledge link: how firms compete through strategic alliances. Boston: Harvard Business School; 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker AC. Catalytic conversations: organizational communication and innovation. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balestri G. Manuale di economia e gestione aziendale. Milan: Ulrico Hoepli Editore S.p. A; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker CB. The analysis of organizational culture as a thermodynamic process. In: Barnett GA, Thayer L, editors. Organization-communication: emerging perspectives. The renaissance in systems thinking. Greenwich: Ablex Publishing Corporation; 1997. p. 121–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett MJ. Basic concepts of intercultural communication. Yarmouth: International Press; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bielenia-Grajewska M. The role of metaphors in the language of investment banking. Ibérica. 2009;17:139–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bielenia-Grajewska, M. Informacyjny aspekt innowacyjnoÅ›ci współczesnych organizacji. Rola komunikacji wewnÄ™trznej i zewnÄ™trznej w kreowaniu nowatorskich firm; 2011. http://innopomorze.pomorskie.eu/innowacyjnosc-w-organizacji/innowacyjnosc-w-organizacji.html. Accessed 20 June 2012.

  • Bielenia-Grajewska M. Linguistics. In: Bainbridge WS, editor. Leadership in science and technology. A reference handbook. Thousand Oaks: SAGE; 2012a. p. 41–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bielenia-Grajewska M. Linguistic aspects of informal learning in corporate online social networks. In: Dennen VP, Myers JB, editors. Virtual professional development and informal learning via social networks. Hershen: IGI Publishing; 2012b. p. 93–112.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bielenia-Grajewska M. Business performance management from the systemic communicative and linguistic side. In: Christiansen B, editor. Cultural variations and business performance: contemporary globalism. Hershen: IGI Publishing; 2012c. p. 230–44.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bielenia-Grajewska M. Corporate linguistic rights through the prism of company linguistic identity capital. In: Akrivopolou C, Garipidis N, editors. Human rights and risks in the digital era: globalization and the effects of information technologies. Hershen: IGI Publishing; 2012d.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogue EG. The leadership choice. Designing climates of blame or responsibility. Bloomington: WestBow; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown V. The economy as text. In: Backhouse R, editor. New directions in economic methodology. London: Routledge; 1994. p. 368–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burkholder TR, Henry D. Criticism of metaphor. In: Kuypers JA, editor. Rhetorical criticism: perspectives in action. Lanham: Lexington Books; 2009. p. 97–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cacciari C. Why do we speak metaphorically? Reflections on the functions of metaphor in discourse and reasoning. In: Katz AN, Cacciari C, Gibbs RW, Turner M, editors. Figurative language and thought. New York: Oxford University Press; 1998. p. 119–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carayannis EG. Conceptual framework for an analysis of diversity and heterogeneity in the knowledge economy and society. In: Carayannis EG, Kaloudis A, Mariussen A, editors. Diversity in the knowledge economy and society: heterogeneity, innovation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar; 2008. p. 95–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carayannis EG, Chanaron JJ. Leading and managing creators, inventors, and innovators: the art, science and craft of fostering creativity, triggering invention, and catalyzing innovation. Westport: Praeger; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carayannis EG, Campbell DFJ. Mode 3’: meaning and implications from a knowledge systems perspective. In: Elias GC, Campbell DFJ, editors. Knowledge creation, diffusion, and use in innovation networks and knowledge clusters. A comparative systems approach across the United States, Europe and Asia. Westport: Praeger; 2006. p. 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carayannis EG, Campbell DFJ. Mode 3’ and ‘Quadruple Helix’: toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem. Int J Technol Manage. 2009;46(3/4):201–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carayannis EG, Campbell DFJ. Mode 3 knowledge production in quadruple helix innovation systems: twenty-first-century democracy, innovation, and entrepreneurship for development. New York: Springer; 2012.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Carayannis EG, von Zedtwitz M. Architecting gloCal (global–local), real-virtual incubator networks (G-RVINs) as catalysts and accelerators of entrepreneurship in transitioning and developing economies: lessons learned and best practices from current development and business incubation practices. Technovation. 2005;25:95–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen WM, Levinthal DA. Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Adm Sci Q. 1990;35(1):128–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crystal D. English as a global language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csíkszentmihályi M. Creativity: flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: Harper Collins; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Egidio F. La nuova bussola del manager. Il valore del capitale intellettuale e la completitivitá dell’impresa. Milan: ETAS; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Espunya A, Zabalbeascoa P. Metaphorical expressions in English and Spanish stock market journalistic texts. In: Jaszczolt K, Turner K, editors. Meaning through language contrast. Amsterdam: John Benjamins; 2003. p. 159–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deignan A. Metaphor and corpus linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, B.V; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodd SD. Metaphors and meaning. A grounded cultural model of us entrepreneurship. J Business Venturing. 2002;17:519–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drucker PF. Nadchodzi nowa organizacja. In: ZarzÄ…dzanie wiedzÄ…. Gliwice: Helion/Harvard Business School Press; 2006. p. 7–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards R, Clevenger T. The effects of schematic and affective processes on metaphorical invention. J Psycholinguist Res. 1990;19(2):91–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher CM, Amabile T. Creativity, improvisation and organizations. In: Rickards T, Runco MA, Moger S, editors. The Routledge companion to creativity. Abingdon: Routledge; 2009. p. 13–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs RW. Metaphors. In: Pritzker SR, Runco MA, editors. Encyclopedia of creativity. San Diego: Academic; 1999. p. 209–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemlin S, Allwood CM, Martin BR. Creative knowledge environments. The influences on creativity in research and innovation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry J. Creativity and perception in management. London: Sage; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson RA, Kast FE, Rosenzweig JE. Systems theory and management. Manage Sci. 1964;10(2):367–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karatsoreos IN, McEwen BS. Stress and allostasis. In: Steptoe A, editor. Handbook of behavioral medicine: methods and applications. New York: Springer; 2010. p. 649–58.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kerzner H. Project management: a systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling. Hoboken: Willey; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • King N, Anderson N. Managing innovation and change: a critical guide for organizations. London: Thomson; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kintsch W. How the mind computes the meaning of metaphor: a simulation based on LSA. In: Gibbs RW, editor. The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2010. p. 129–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhlmann S. Future governance of innovation policy in Europe – three scenarios. Research Policy. 2001;30:953–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Küppers G, Pyka A. The self-organization of innovation networks: introductory remarks. In: Pyka A, Küppers G, editors. Innovation networks - theory and practice. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar; 2002. p. 3–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Komives SR, Lucas N, McMahon TR. Exploring leadership: for college students who want to make a difference. San Francisco: Wiley; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kövecses Z. Metaphor in culture: universality and variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2005.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kuratko DF. Entrepreneurship: theory, process, practice. Mason: South-Western Cengage Learning; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurth E. Altered images. Cognitive and pragmatic aspects of metaphor translation. In: Vandaele J, editor. Translation and the re(location) of meaning. Leuven: University of Leuven; 1999. p. 97–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff G, Turner M. More than cool reason. A field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press; 1989.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • LeFevre KB. Invention as a social act. Carbondale: Conference on College Composition and Communication, Southern Illinois University Press: Carbondale; 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemon M, Sahota PS. Organizational culture as a knowledge repository for increased innovative capacity. Technovation. 2004;24(6):483–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipovetsky G. The hyperconsumption society. In: Ekström KM, Glans K, editors. Beyond the consumption bubble. New York: Routledge; 2011. p. 25–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lumby J, English FW. Leadership as lunacy. And other metaphors for educational leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLeod PL. Leading teams. Choose the right metaphor. Leader Excel. 2012;29(3):8–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • McPherson M, Lovin LS, Cook JM. Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks. Annu Rev Sociol. 2001;27:415–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore S. Strategic project portfolio management. Enabling a productive organization. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller R. Critical analysis of creative metaphors in political speeches. In: Low G, Todd Z, Deignan A, Cameron L, editors. Researching and applying metaphor in the real world. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, BV; 2010. p. 321–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Needle D. Business in context: an introduction to business and its environment. Andover: Cengage Learning EMEA; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka I, Takeuchi H. The knowledge-creating company: how Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olds LE. Metaphors of interrelatedness: toward a systems theory of psychology. Albany: State University of New York; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramage M, Shipp K. Systems thinkers. London: Springer; 2009.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Reeves C. The language of science. Abingdon: Routledge; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers EM. Diffusion of innovations. New York: The Free Press; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runco MA. Creativity: theories and themes: research, development, and practice. Burlington, MA: Elsevier; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schon DA. Invention and the revolution of ideas. London: Tavistock; 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scollon R, Wong Scollon S. Intercultural communication-a discourse approach. Oxford: Blackwell; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Semino E, Steen G. Metaphor in literature. In: Gibbs RW, editor. The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2010. p. 232–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szlendak T. Siecio -smycze i wartoÅ›ci przyszÅ‚oÅ›ci. Pomorski PrzeglÄ…d Gospodarczy. 2010;44:44–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shotter J, Cunliffe AL. Managers as practical authors: everyday conversations for action. In: Holman D, Thorpe R, editors. Management and language: the manager as practical author. London: Sage; 2002. p. 15–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spicer A, Alvesson M. Metaphors for leadership. In: Alvesson M, Spicer A, editors. Metaphors we lead by. Understanding leadership in the real world. Abingdon: Routledge; 2011. p. 31–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teubner G. Autopoiesis in law and society: a rejoinder to Blankenburg. Law Society Rev. 1984;18(2):291–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thatcher SMB, Brown SA. Individual creativity in teams: the importance of communication media mix. Decision Support Syst. 2010;49:290–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vega Moreno RE. Creativity and convention: the pragmatics of everyday figurative speech. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, B.V; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vincent CP. Heuristique: création, intuition, créativité et stratégies d'Innovation. Paris: Editions BoD, France; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber RJ. Toward a language of invention and synthetic thinking. Creativ Res J. 1996;9(4):353–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welfens PJJ, Addison JT, Audretsch DB, Gries T, Grupp H. Globalization, economic growth and innovation dynamics. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 1999.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Magdalena Bielenia-Grajewska .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media LLC

About this entry

Cite this entry

Bielenia-Grajewska, M., Carayannis, E.G., Campbell, D.F.J. (2013). Linguistic Dimension of Creativity, Invention, Innovation, and Entrepreneurship. In: Carayannis, E.G. (eds) Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3858-8_478

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3858-8_478

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-3857-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-3858-8

  • eBook Packages: Business and Economics

Publish with us

Policies and ethics