Abstract
Carotid and coronary vascular problems, such as heart attack or stroke, are often originated in vulnerable plaques. Hence, the accurate characterization of plaque echogenic contents could help in diagnosing such lesions.
The Rayleigh distribution is widely accepted as an appropriate model to describe plaque morphology although it is known that other more complex distributions depending on multiple parameters are usually needed whenever the tissues show significant heterogeneity.In this chapter a new model to describe the tissue echo-morphology by using a mixture of Rayleigh distribution is described. This model, called Rayleigh Mixture Model (RMM), combines the robustness of a mixture model with the mathematical simplicity and adequacy of the Rayleigh distributions to deal with the speckle multiplicative noise that corrupts the ultrasound images.
The method for the automatic estimation of the RMM mixture parameters by using the Expectation Maximization (EM) algorithm is described.The performance of the proposed model is evaluated with a database of in-vitro IVUS samples. We show that the mixture coefficients and Rayleigh parameters explicitly derived from the mixture model are able to accurately describe different plaque types and to significantly improve the characterization performance of an already existing methodology.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Spagnoli LG (2004) Extracranial thrombotically active carotid plaque as a risk factor for ischemic stroke. J Am Med Assoc 292(15):1845–1852
Burckhardt C (1978) Speckle in ultrasound B-mode scans. IEEE Trans Son Ultrason SU-25(1):1–6
Nicolaides AN, Kakkos SK, Griffin M, Sabetai M, Dhanjil S et al (2005) Severity of asymptomatic carotid stenosis and risk of ipsilateral hemispheric ischaemic events: results from the ACSRS study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 30(3):275–284
Loizou CP, Pattichis CS (2008) Despeckle filtering algorithms and software for ultrasound imaging. Morgan & Claypool, San Rafael
Loizou CP, Pattichis CS, Christodoulou CI, Istepanian RSH, Pantziaris M (2005) Comparative evaluation of despeckle filtering in ultrasound imaging of the carotid artery. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectrics Freq Contr 52(10):1653–1669
Sanches JM, Nascimento JC, Marques JS (2008) Medical image noise reduction using the sylvester-lyapunov equation. IEEE Trans Image Process 17(9):1522–1539
Szabo TL (2004) Diagnostic ultrasound imaging: inside out. Academic, New York
Thijssen J (2003) Ultrasonic speckle formation, analysis and processing applied to tissue characterization. Pattern Recogn Lett 24(4–5):659–675
Diethrich E et al (2007) Virtual histology intravascular ultrasound assessment of carotid artery disease: the carotid artery plaque virtual histology evaluation (CAPITAL) study. J Endovasc Therap 14(5):676–686
Gussenhoven E, Essed C, Frietman P (1989) Intravascular ultrasonic imaging: histologic and echographic correlation. Eur J Vascu Surg 3:571–576
Mintz GS, Nissen SE, Anderson WD (2001) American college of cardiology clinical expert consensus document on standards for acquisition, measurement and reporting of intravascular ultrasound studies (ivus). J Am College Cardiol 37:1478–1492
Zhang X, McKay CR, Sonka M (1998) Tissue characterization in intravascular ultrasound images. IEEE Trans Med Imag 17(6):889–899
Pujol O, Rosales M, Radeva P, Nofrerias-Fernandez E (2003) Intravascular ultrasound images vessel characterization using adaboost. In: Functional imaging and modelling of the heart: lecture notes in computer science, pp 242–251
Granada J et al (2007) In vivo plaque characterization using intravascular ultrasound virtual histology in a porcine model of complex coronary lesions. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 27(2):387–393
Nair A, Kuban B, Tuzcu E, Schoenhagen P, Nissen S, Vince D (2002) Coronary plaque classification with intravascular ultrasound radiofrequency data analysis. Circulation 106:2200–2206
DeMaria A, Narula J, Mahamud E, Tsimikas S (2006) Imaging vulnerable plaque by ultrasound. J Am College Cardiol 47(8):32–39
Sathyanarayana S, Carlier S, Li W, Thomas L (2009) Characterisation of atherosclerotic plaque by spectral similarity of radiofrequency intravascular ultrasound signals. EuroIntervention 5(1):133–139
Lopes A, Touzi R, Nezry E (1990) Adaptive speckle filters and scene heterogeneity. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 28(6):992–1000
Eltoft T (2006) Modeling the amplitude statistics of ultrasonic images. IEEE Trans Med Imag 25(2):229–240; Comparative Study.
Prager RW, Gee AH, Treece GM, Berman LH (2003) Decompression and speckle detection for ultrasound images using the homodyned k-distribution. Pattern Recogn Lett 24(4–5):705–713
Jakeman E (1984) Speckle statistics with a small number of scatterers. Optic Eng 23:453–461
Dutt V, Greenleaf JF (1994) Ultrasound echo envelope analysis using a homodyned k dis- tribution signal model. Ultrason Imag 16(4):265–287
Shankar PM (2001) Ultrasonic tissue characterization using a generalized Nakagami model. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectrics Freq Contr 48(6):1716–1720
Dempster AP, Laird NM, Rdin DB (1977) Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. J Roy Stat Soc Ser B 39:1–38
Gallaudet T, de Moustier C (2003) High-frequency volume and boundary acoustic backscatter fluctuations in shallowwater. J Acoust Soc Am 114(2):707–725
Sorensen K, Andersen S (2007) Rayleigh mixture model-based hidden markov modeling and estimation of noise in noisy speech signals. IEEE Trans Audio Speech Lang Process 15(3):901–917
Ciompi F, Pujol O, Gatta C, Rodriguez O, Mauri F, Radeva P (2009) Fusing in-vitro and in-vivo intravascular ultrasound data for plaque characterization. Int J Cardiovasc Imag (formerly cardiac imaging) 26(7):763–779. doi:10.1007/s10554-009-9543-1.
Sehgal C (1993) Quantitative relationship between tissue composition and scattering of ultrasound. Acoust Soc Am J 94:1944–1952
Hadley G (1964) Nonlinear and dynamic programming. Addison-Wesley, Reading
Harris JW, Stocker H (1998) Maximum likelihood method In: Handbook of mathematics and computational science. Springer, New York, p 824
Caballero KL, Barajas J, Pujol O, Rodriguez O, Radeva P (2007) Using reconstructed ivus images for coronary plaque classification. In: Proceedings of IEEE international conference on engineering in medicine and biology, Cit Internationale, Lyon, France, pp 2167–2170
Rosales M, Radeva P (2005) A basic model for IVUS image simulation. In: Handbook of biomedical image analysis, Topics in biomedical engineering international book series. Springer, New York, pp 1–55
Dietterich TG, Bakiri G (1995) Solving multiclass learning problems via error-correcting output codes. J Artif Intell Res 2:263–286
Schapire RE (1997) Using output codes to boost multiclass learning problems. In Proceedings of 14th international conference on machine learning. Morgan Kaufmann, CA, pp 313–321
Rennie J (2003) Boosting with decision stumps and binary features. Technical report, MIT, MA
Cover TM, Thomas JA (1991) Elements of information theory. Wiley-Interscience, NY
Demšar J (2006) Statistical comparisons of classifiers over multiple data sets. J Mach Learn Res 7:1–30
Schapire RE (2001) The boosting approach to machine learning: an overview. In: MSRI workshop on nonlinear estimation and classification. Berkeley, CA, USA
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Seabra, J., Ciompi, F., Radeva, P., Sanches, J.M. (2012). A Rayleigh Mixture Model for IVUS Imaging. In: Sanches, J., Laine, A., Suri, J. (eds) Ultrasound Imaging. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1180-2_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1180-2_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-1179-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-1180-2
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)