Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Eliciting Expert Knowledge of Forest Succession Using an Innovative Software Tool

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Expert Knowledge and Its Application in Landscape Ecology

Abstract

Professionals add a wealth of experiential knowledge to the application of scientific data and the implementation of procedures in many fields of work. In the forestry sector, expert knowledge is used in developing strategic plans for forest management, including large-scale land-use planning to manage the timber supply (OMNR 2010), or for conservation planning (McNay et al. 2005, 2006). Tactical applications of expert knowledge in forestry include landscape mapping (Walton and Meidinger 2006) and forest management operations (Willoughby and Thomson 2004; Bone et al. 2007). Despite the common use of expert knowledge in forestry applications, this use is neither formal nor rigorous, and the knowledge is often implicit and latent, with unknown characteristics and reliability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bone C, Dragicevic S, Roberts A (2007) Evaluating forest management practices using a GIS-based cellular automata modeling approach with multispectral imagery. Environ Model Assess 12:105–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cleaves DA (1994) Assessing uncertainty in expert judgments about natural resources. USDA For Serv, South For Exp Stn, New Orleans, Gen Tech Rep SO-110

    Google Scholar 

  • Czembor CA, Vesk PA (2009) Incorporating between-expert uncertainty into state-and-transition simulation models for forest restoration. For Ecol Manage 259:165–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis A, Ruddle K (2010) Constructing confidence: rational skepticism and systematic enquiry in local ecological knowledge research. Ecol Appl 20:880–894

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Drescher MD, Perera AH (2010a) A network approach for evaluating and communicating forest change models. J Appl Ecol 47:57–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drescher MD, Perera AH (2010b) Comparing two sets of forest cover change knowledge used in forest landscape management planning. J Environ Plan Manage 53:591–613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drescher M, Perera AH, Buse LJ, et al (2006) Identifying uncertainty in practitioner knowledge of boreal forest succession in Ontario through a workshop approach. Ont Min Nat Resour, Ont For Res Inst, Sault Ste. Marie, For Res Rep No 165

    Google Scholar 

  • Drescher M, Perera AH, Buse LJ, et al (2008a) Boreal forest succession in Ontario: An analysis of the knowledge space. Ont Min Nat Resour, Ont For Res Inst, Sault Ste. Marie, For Res Rep No 171

    Google Scholar 

  • Drescher M, Perera AH, Buse LJ, et al (2008b) Uncertainty in expert knowledge of forest succession: A case study from boreal Ontario. For Chron 84:194–209

    Google Scholar 

  • Forbis TA, Provencher L, Frid L, Medlyn G (2006) Great Basin land management planning using ecological modeling. Environ Manage 38:62–83

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heckathorn DD (1997) Respondent-driven sampling: A new approach to the study of hidden populations. Soc Probl 44:174–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hemstrom MA, Merzenich J, Reger A, Wales B (2007) Integrated analysis of landscape management scenarios using state and transition models in the upper Grande Ronde River Subbasin, Oregon, USA. Landsc Urban Plan 80:198–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hora SC (1996) Aleatory and epistemic uncertainty in probability elicitation with an example from hazardous waste management. Reliabil Engineer Syst Saf 54:217–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James A, Low-Choy S, Mengersen K (2010) Elicitator: An expert elicitation tool for regression in ecology. Environ Mod Softw 25:129–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janis IL (1972) Victims of groupthink. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • King, W, Mark PV Jr, McCoy S (2002) The most important issues in knowledge management. Commun ACM 45:93–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koniak G, Noy-Meier I (2009) A hierarchical, multi-scale, management-responsive model of Mediterranean vegetation dynamics. Ecol Mod 220:1148–1158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kozlowski SW, Salas E (eds) (2009) Learning, training, and development in organizations. Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood C, Moore T (1993) Harvest scheduling with spatial constraints: a simulated annealing approach. Can J For Res 23:468–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNay RS, Apps C, Wilson S, et al (2006) Use of habitat supply models to establish herd based recovery targets for threatened mountain caribou in British Columbia: Year 2 Progress Report. Wildlife Infometrics Inc., Mackenzie, Rep No 180

    Google Scholar 

  • McNay RS, Caldwell JL, Sulyma R (2005) Impact of riparian management on timber supply in the Mackenzie TSA, British Columbia. Wildlife Infometrics Inc., Mackenzie, Rep No 167

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, MA, Booker JM (1991) Eliciting and analyzing expert judgement: A practical guide. Knowledge-based Systems Vol 5. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Neilsen, C, Dane-Nielsen, HC (2010) The emergent properties of intellectual capital; a conceptual offering. J Human Resour Cost Account 14:6–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OMNR (2010) Ontario’s forest management guides: an introduction. Ont Min Nat Resour, Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario. Available from http://www.mnr.gov.on.ca/stdprodconsume/groups/lr/@mnr/@forests/documents/document/mnr_e000257.pdf (Accessed November 2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouellette M, Drescher, MD (2010) Succession Pathway Tool user’s guide. Ont. Min Nat Resour, Ont For Res Inst, Sault Ste. Marie, For Res Inf Pap No 173

    Google Scholar 

  • Perera AH, Ouellette MR, Cui W, et al (2008) BFOLDS 1.0: A spatial simulation model for exploring large scale fire regimes and succession in boreal forest landscapes. Ont. Min Nat Resour, Ont For Res Inst, Sault Ste. Marie, For Res Rep No 152

    Google Scholar 

  • Ride KR, Longpre TWF, Racey GD, Elkie PC (2004) Estimates of ecoregional forest composition derived using modelled bounds of natural variation in Northwestern Ontario. Ont Min Nat Resour, Northwest Sci Inf, Thunder Bay, Tech Rep TR-136

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor AR, Chen HYH, Van Damme L (2009) A review of forest succession models and their suitability for forest management planning. For Sci 55:23–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasiliauskas S, Chen HYH, Parton J, et al (2004) Successional pathways: Proposed SFMM rules for northeast regional standard forest units, Version 2. Ont Min Nat Resour, Northeast Sci Inf, South Porcupine, Tech Note TN-018

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton A, Meidinger D (2006) Capturing expert knowledge for ecosystem mapping using Bayesian networks. Can J For Res 36:3087–3103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welch S (1975) Sampling by referral in a dispersed population. Publ Opinion Quart 39:237–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willoughby I, Thomson JA (2004) Expert help on herbicide selection. For Brit Timber 33:30

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Planning, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, ON, Canada, N2L 3G1

    Michael Drescher

  2. Ontario Forest Research Institute, 1235 Queen Street East, Sault Ste. Marie, ON, Canada, P6A 2E5

    Lisa J. Buse, Ajith H. Perera & Marc R. Ouellette

Authors
  1. Michael Drescher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lisa J. Buse
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ajith H. Perera
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Marc R. Ouellette
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Drescher .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Ontario Forest Research Institute, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Queen St. East 1235, Sault Ste. Marie, P6A 2E5, Ontario, Canada

    Ajith H. Perera

  2. Dept. Zoology, Biodiversity & Spatial Information Ctr., North Carolina State University, Raleigh, 27695, North Carolina, USA

    C. Ashton Drew

  3. Fac. Natural Resources &, Environmental Studies, University of Northern British Columbia, University Way 3333, Prince George, V2N 4Z9, British Columbia, Canada

    Chris J. Johnson

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Drescher, M., Buse, L.J., Perera, A.H., Ouellette, M.R. (2012). Eliciting Expert Knowledge of Forest Succession Using an Innovative Software Tool. In: Perera, A., Drew, C., Johnson, C. (eds) Expert Knowledge and Its Application in Landscape Ecology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1034-8_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation