Skip to main content

Community-Based Operations Research: Introduction, Theory, and Applications

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Community-Based Operations Research

Part of the book series: International Series in Operations Research & Management Science ((ISOR,volume 167))

Abstract

Community-based operations research (CBOR) is the name of a new sub-discipline within operations research and the management sciences. CBOR synthesizes previous practice and research traditions within OR/MS to address problems within the public sector that are often of a localized nature, that address the concerns of citizens affiliated through characteristics of race, ethnicity and class and other ties, and that are solved using diverse qualitative and quantitative methods. Solutions to these problems are developed and implemented by formal and informal organizations, and embody a critical perspective toward traditional notions of decision makers, stakeholders, and analytic methods. The most proximate antecedents of CBOR are the well-studied fields of community operational research, problem structuring methods, and soft systems methodologies. This chapter provides a framework for understanding CBOR through key themes such as the importance of place and space, community, disadvantaged populations, and multiple methods. It introduces a theory of CBOR, surveys recent literature within CBOR, and assesses the presence of CBOR in OR/MS literature, education, and practice. After a summary of this book’s 12 chapters, 11 of which are newly published, the introduction concludes by summarizing the important contributions of CBOR and identifies some promising avenues for future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The field of social network analysis is based on relationships between individuals and groups that share common beliefs, characteristics, or goals (Wasserman & Faust, 1994). The importance of social virtues and duties and participative decision making distinguishes the “communitarian” view of communities from the “liberal” view (Midgley & Ochoa-Arias, 2004b).

  2. 2.

    Operations Research, Management Science, Manufacturing and Service Operations Management, Decision Analysis, European Journal of Operational Research, Mathematics of Operations Research, Mathematical Programming, Journal of the American Statistical Association, Annals of Operations Research.

References

  • Ackerman, F., et al. (2009). The case for soft O.R. OR/MS Today (Letter to the Editor), April, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackoff, R. L. (1970). A Black Ghetto’s research on a university. Operations Research, 18, 761–771.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ackoff, R. L. (1979a). The future of operational research is past. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 30, 93–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackoff, R. L. (1979b). Resurrecting the future of operational research. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 30, 189–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altay, N., & Green, W. G., III. (2006). OR/MS research in disaster operations management. European Journal of Operational Research, 175, 475–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baltussen, R., Youngkong, S., Paolucci, F., & Niessen, L. (2010). Multi-criteria decision analysis to prioritize health interventions: capitalizing on first experiences. Health Policy, 96(3), 262–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bardach, E. (2005). A practical guide for policy analysis: the eightfold path to more effective problem solving. Washington, DC: CQ Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartolucci, V., & Gallo, G. (2010). Operations research/management science contributions to peace studies. International Transactions in Operational Research, 17(4), 475–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bayley, L., Ferrell, S., & Mckinnell, J. (2009). Practicing what We preach: a case study on the application of evidence-based practice to inform decision making for public services staffing in an academic health sciences library. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 15(2), 235–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackwood, A., Wing, K. T., & Pollack, T. H. (2008). The nonprofit sector in brief: facts and figures from nonprofit almanac 2008: public charities, giving and volunteering. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, D. (2007). Systemic action research: a strategy for whole system change. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caulkins, J. P., Eelman, E., Ratnatunga, M., & Schaarsmith, D. (2008). Operations research and public policy for Africa: harnessing the revolution in management science instruction. International Transactions in Operational Research, 15(2), 151–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P. (1981). Systems thinking, systems practice. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P. (2001). Soft systems methodology. In: Rational analysis for a problematic world revisited: problem structuring methods for complexity, uncertainty and conflict. Chichester: Wiley, pp. 61–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchman, C. W. (1970). Operations research as a profession. Management Science, 17, B37–B53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchman, C. W. (1979). The systems approach and its enemies. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochran, J. (Ed.). (2011). Wiley encyclopedia of operations research and management science. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, S. (1994). A community accounting matrix for Buffalo's east side neighborhood. Economic Development Quarterly, 8(2), 107–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, S. (1995). Lifelines and livelihood: a social accounting matrix approach to calamity preparedness. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 3, 228–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, S. (2002). Water resources in China's yellow river delta. In M. Chatterji, S. Arlosoroff, & G. Guha (Eds.), Conflict management of water resources (pp. 116–144). Surrey: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Souza Briggs, X. (Ed.). (2005). The geography of opportunity: race and housing choice in Metropolitan America. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Vericourt, F., & Lobo, M. S. (2009). Resource and revenue management in nonprofit operations. Operations Research, 57(5), 1114–1128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delaney, T. (2011a). An uncomfortable – but necessary – conversation: Part I. Nonprofit Quarterly. http://www.nonprofitquarterly.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=9256:an-uncomfortable-but-necessary-conversation-part-i&catid=153:features&Itemid=336. Accessed 17 Mar 2011.

  • Delaney, T. (2011b). An uncomfortable – but necessary – conversation: Part II. Nonprofit Quarterly.http://www.nonprofitquarterly.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=9296:an-uncomfortable-but-necessary-conversation-part-ii&catid=153:features&Itemid=336. Accessed 17 Mar 2011.

  • Ewing, B., & Baker, E. (2009). Development of a green building decision support tool: a collaborative process. Decision Analysis, 6(3), 172–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foote, J. L., Gregor, J. E., Hepi, M. C., Baker, V. E., Houston, D. J., & Midgley, G. (2007). Systemic problem structuring applied to community involvement in water conservation. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 58(5), 645–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franco, L. A., & Montibeller, G. (2010). Facilitated modelling in operational research. European Journal of Operational Research, 205, 489–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gass, S. I. (1994). Public sector analysis and operations research/management science. In S. M. Pollock, M. H. Rothkopf, & A. Barnett (Eds.), Operations research and the public sector (pp. 23–46). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Grass, D., Caulkins, J. P., Feichtinger, G., Tragler, G., & Behrens, D. A. (2010). Optimal control of nonlinear processes: with applications in drugs, corruption, and terror. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grubesic, T., & Murray, A. (2010). Methods to support policy evaluation of Sex offender laws. Papers in Regional Science, 89(3), 669–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hare, W. L., Alimadad, A., Dodd, H., Ferguson, R., & Rutherford, A. (2009). A deterministic model of home and community care client counts in British Columbia. Health Care Management Science, 12(1), 80–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hermans, L. M., & Thissen, W. A. H. (2009). Actor analysis methods and their use for public policy analysts. European Journal of Operations Research, 196(2), 808–818.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M. C. (2004). Community operational research: purposes, theory and practice. In G. Midgley & A. E. Ochoa-Arias (Eds.), Community operational research: OR and systems thinking for community development (pp. 57–74). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jehu-Appiah, C., Baltussen, R., Acquah, C., Aikins, M., d’Almeida, S. A., Bosu, W. K., et al. (2008). Balancing equity and efficiency in health priorities in Ghana: the use of multicriteria decision analysis. Value in Health, 11(7), 1081–1087.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M.P., Hollander, J., & Hallulli, A. (2011). Decision Models for Residential Housing Planning in an Era of Municipal Shrinkage, INFORMS Northeast Regional Conference, Amherst, MA, May 7, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M.P., Keisler, J., Solak, S., Turcotte, D. (2010). Collaborative proposal: decision models for foreclosed housing acquisition and redevelopment, 1 August 2010 – 30 July 2012. Funded by National Science Foundation at $374,718.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. P., & Smilowitz, K. (2007). Community-based operations research. In T. Klastorin (Ed.), Tutorials in operations research 2007 (pp. 102–123). Hanover, MD: Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. P., Turcotte, D., & Sullivan, F. M. (2010). What foreclosed homes should a municipality purchase to stabilize vulnerable neighborhoods? Networks and Spatial Economics, 10(3), 363–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, E. H. (2008). Adventures in policy modeling! Operations research in the community and beyond. Omega, 36(1), 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keeney, R. L. (1996). Value-focused thinking: identifying decision opportunities and creating opportunities. European Journal of Operational Research, 92, 537–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirby, M. W. (2007). Paradigm change in operations research: thirty years of debate. Operations Research, 55(1), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, R. A., Dickinson, K. L., Anderson, R. M., Fowler, V. G., Miranda, M. L., Mutero, C. M., et al. (2009). Using decision analysis to improve malaria control policy making. Health Policy, 92(2), 133–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larson, R. C., & Odoni, A. R. (2007). Urban operations research (2nd ed.). Charlestown, MA: Dynamic Ideas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Menestrel, M., & Van Wassenhove, L. N. (2009). Ethics in operations research and management sciences: a never-ending effort to combine rigor and passion. Omega, 37(6), 1039–1043.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, E. K., Chen, C., Pietz, F., & Benecke, B. (2009). Modeling and optimizing the public-health infrastructure for emergency response. International Journal of Risk Assessment & Management, 12(2–4), 311–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Libertore, M. J., & Luo, W. (2010). The analytics movement: implications for operations research. Interfaces, 40(4), 313–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, M., & Schilling, D. (1994). Equity measurement in facility location analysis: a review and framework. European Journal of Operational Research, 74, 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meredith, J. (1998). Building operations management theory through case and field research. Journal of Operations Management, 16, 441–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, G., & Ochoa-Arias, A. (Eds.). (2004a). Community operational research: OR and systems thinking for community development. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, G., & Ochoa-Arias, A. E. (2004b). Visions of community for community OR. In G. Midgley & A. E. Ochoa-Arias (Eds.), Community operational research: OR and systems thinking for community development (pp. 75–108). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, J. W. (2009). Spatial decision support in a post-disaster environment: a community-focused approach. Cartographica, 44(1), 17–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mingers, J. (2000a). The contribution of critical realism as an underpinning philosophy for OR/MS and systems. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 51(11), 1256–1270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mingers, J. (2000b). What is it to be critical? Teaching a critical approach to management undergraduates. Management Learning, 31(2), 219–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mingers, J. (2001). Multimethodology – mixing and matching methods. In J. Rosenhead & J. Mingers (Eds.), Rational analysis for a problematic world revisited: problem structuring methods for complexity, uncertainty and conflict (2nd ed., pp. 289–309). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mingers, J. (2009). Taming hard problems with soft OR. OR/MS Today, 36(2), 48–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mingers, J. (2011a). Soft OR Comes of Age - But Not Everywhere! Omega 39(6): 729–741.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mingers, J. (2011b). Ethics and OR: operationalising discourse ethics. European Journal of Operational Research, 210, 114–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Namen, A. A., Bornstein, C. T., & Rosenhead, J. (2009). Robustness analysis for sustainable community development. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 60(5), 587–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (2001a). America becoming: racial trends and their consequences, volume I. Prepared by the Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. N.J. Smelser, W.J. Wilson, F. Mitchell (Eds.). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (2001b). America becoming: racial trends and their consequences, volume II. Prepared by the Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. N.J. Smelser, W.J. Wilson, F. Mitchell (Eds.). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2008). Growing unequal? Income distribution and poverty in OECD countries. Country note: United States. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/47/2/41528678.pdf. Accessed 9 Jan 2011.

  • Olson, J. (2000). Top journals in operations management and operations research. University of Pittsburgh. http://www.bus.ucf.edu/csaunders/omor%20journals.pdf. Accessed 15 Jan 2011.

  • Parry, R., & Mingers, J. (2004). Community operational research: its context and its future. In G. Midgley & A. E. Ochoa-Arias (Eds.), Community operational research: OR and systems thinking for community development (pp. 39–56). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, L. (1989). Decision analysis for group decision support. In C. Eden & J. Radford (Eds.), Tackling strategic problems: the role of group decision support. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, S.M., Rothkopf, M.H. & Barnett A. (Eds.). (1994). Operations Research and the Public Sector. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawal, P. H., Anderson, T. R., Romansky, J. R., & Lyons, J. S. (2008). Using decision support to address racial disparities in mental health service utilization. Residential Treatment for Children & Youth, 25(1), 73–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenhead, J., & Mingers, J. (Eds.). (2001). Rational analysis for a problematic world revisited: problem structuring methods for complexity, uncertainty and conflict (2nd ed.). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweigman, C. (2008). Food security problems in Sub-Saharan Africa: operations research as a tool of analysis. International Transactions in Operational Research, 15(2), 173–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheppard, V. B., Williams, K. P., Harrison, T. M., Jennings, Y., Lucas, W., Stephen, J., et al. (2010). Development of decision-support intervention for black women with breast cancer. Psycho-Oncology, 19(1), 62–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silva, M. E., & Johnson, M. P. (2009). Using facility-location models to optimally locate hierarchical community-based health facilities in Davao city. Acta Medica Philippina, 43(3), 18–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simchi-Levi, D. (2009). Not the appropriate outlet. OR/MS Today (Response to Letter to the Editor), April 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sodhi, M. S., & Tang, C. S. (2010). Conclusion: a long view of research and practice in operations research and management science. In M. S. Sodhi & C. S. Tang (Eds.), A long view of research and practice in operations research and management science (pp. 275–297). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Taket, A., & White, L. (1997). Wanted: dead or alive – ways of using problem-structuring methods in community OR. International Transactions in Operational Research, 4(2), 99–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taket, A., & White, L. (2000). Partnership and participation: decision-making in the multiagency setting. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Health Foundation. (2010). Improvement in Practice: Commissioning with the Community. Prepared by London School of Economics with the NHS Isle of Wight. http://www.health.org.uk/publications/commissioning-with-the-community/.

  • United Nations Capital Development Fund. (2010). Local governments and service delivery. Framing paper, Global forum on local development: pursuing the millenium development goals through local government. www.uncdf.org/gfld/docs/session_2.pdf. Accessed 9 Jan 2011.

  • Vernis, A., Iglesias, M., Sanz, B., & Saz-Carranza, A. (2006). Nonprofit organizations: challenges and collaboration. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Evera, S. (1997). Guide to methods for students of political science. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voss, K., & Williams, M. (2009). The local in the global: rethinking social movements in the new millennium. University of California, Berkeley: Institute for Research on Labor and Employment. http://escholarship.org/uc/item/1c64s44f. Accessed 9 Jan 2011.

  • Wang, Y., & Zou, Z. (2010). Spatial decision support system for urban planning: case study of Harbin city in China. Journal of Urban Planning & Development, 136(2), 147–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenstop, F., & Koppang, H. (2009). On operations research and value conflicts. Omega, 37, 1109–1120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winston, W.L., & Venkataramanan, M. (2003). Introduction to mathematical programming: operations research, volume 1, 4th edn. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole, “Chapter 1: An Introduction to Model-Building”, pp. 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: design and models (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This chapter was greatly improved by the comments and suggestions of Gerald Midgley, John Mingers, and Paula Ryan. Editorial and research assistants Rachel Drew and Joshua Rinaldi collected and reviewed the literature and generated statistics and references that made this chapter possible. Editorial assistant Alma Hallulli reformatted the chapter. My 2007 collaboration with Karen Smilowitz was the source of the original definition of CBOR and is a primary source of inspiration for this chapter.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael P. Johnson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Johnson, M.P. (2012). Community-Based Operations Research: Introduction, Theory, and Applications. In: Johnson, M. (eds) Community-Based Operations Research. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 167. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0806-2_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics