Summary
An attempt is made to describe the uses of intellectual history for understanding and criticizing psychological theories. The historical analysis of mental products works at three levels, defined by the degree of articulation of mental products and the broadness and type of social support for them. The top level comprises the doxography of theories, the history of problems, the history of concepts, and the history of ideas. The middle layer is the domain of intellectual history proper. The bottom layer consists of the study of mentalities and belongs to historical psychology rather than to the history of psychology. A model for intellectual history recently proposed by Lindenfeld is reviewed, where a distinction is made between systems and embodiments and their respective social functions. Lindenfeld’s model is applied to explain certain peculiarities of German psychology during the Weimar Republic. It is concluded that the widespread and often purely rhetorical use of the Ganzheit concept indicates that the concept had the function of an embodiment in Lindenfeld’s sense.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Boring, E. G. (1950). A history of experimental psychology. 2nd ed. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Burkamp, W. (1929). Die Struktur der Ganzheiten. Berlin: Junker & Dünnhaupt.
Henning, H. (1931). Psychologie der Gegenwart. 2nd ed. Leipzig: Kröner.
Hildebrandt, H. (1989). Die wissenschaftsgeschichtlichen Ursprünge der Krise der Psychologie in der Weimarar Republik. In A. Schorr & G. Wehner (Eds.), Psychologiegeschichte heute. In press.
Jaroschewski, M. (1975). Psychologie im 20. Jahrhundert (Russian original, 2nd ed. (1974). Berlin, DDR: Volk & Wissen.
Kelly, D. (1987). Horizons of intellectual history: Retrospect, circumspect, prospect. Journal of the History of Ideas, 48, 143–169.
Klemm, O. (1911). Geschichte der Psychologie. Leipzig, Berlin: Teuber.
Krieger, L. (1973). The autonomy of intellectual history. Journal of the History of Ideas, 34, 499–516.
Krueger, F. (1932). Das Problem der Ganzheit. Quoted after: F. Krueger, Zur Philosophie und Psychologie der Ganzheit, E. Heuss (Ed.). Berlin, Göttingen, Heidelberg: Springer 1953.
Lindenfeld, D. F. (1988). On systems and embodiments as categories for intellectual history. History and Theory, 27, 30–50.
Lovejoy, A. O. (1936). The great chain of being: A study of the history of an idea. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Mandelbaum, M. (1965). History of ideas, intellectual history, and the history of philosophy. History and Theory, Beiheft 5, 33–66.
Messer, A. (1927). Einführung in die Psychologie und die psychologischen Richtungen der Gegenwart. Leipzig: Meiner.
Müller-Freienfels, R. (1929). Hauptrichtungen der Psychologie. Leipzig: Quelle & Meyer.
Richter, M. (1987). Begriffsgeschichte and the history of ideas. Journal of the History of Ideas, 48, 247–263.
Ringer, F. K. (1969). The decline of the German mandarins. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Saupe, E. (1928). Einführung in die neuere Psychologie, E. Saupe (Ed.), 2nd ed. Osterwieck/Harz: Zickfeldt.
Scheerer, E. (1985). Organische Weltanschauung und Ganzheitspsychologie. In C.F. Graumann (Ed.), Psychologie im Nationalsozialismus (pp. 15–53). Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, Tokyo: Springer.
Scheerer, E. (1989a). Psychologie. In K. Gründer, et al. (Eds.), Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie (pp. 1599–1653). Bd. 7. Basel, Stuttgart: Schwabe.
Scheerer, E. (1989b). Fighters of the word: The ideology of German psychologists in World War I and its effects on postwar German psychology. Paper presented at the Cheiron conference, Kingston, Ontario, June 1989.
Sontheimer, K. (1987). Antidemokratisches Denken in der Weimarer Republik. Müchen: DTV.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1990 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Scheerer, E. (1990). How Can Intellectual History Help Us to Understand Psychological Theories?. In: Baker, W.J., Hyland, M.E., van Hezewijk, R., Terwee, S. (eds) Recent Trends in Theoretical Psychology. Recent Research in Psychology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-9688-8_32
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-9688-8_32
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-97311-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-9688-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive