Skip to main content

The Pathology of Monochorionic Monozygosity

  • Chapter
Pathology of Multiple Pregnancy

Abstract

One of the major concepts espoused in this volume is that placental form can be as important to the outcome of a twin conception as the genetic derivation of the conceptuses. The most clear-cut evidence for this concept is in monochorionic monozygotic twinning. Except for genetic considerations, monozygotic twins with dichorionic placentas have similar developmental and gestational risks as dizygotic twins. Monochorionic monozygotic twins, however, have two additional potential sources of problems—vascular anastomoses between the fetuses and/or abnormalities of duplication.1, 2 The consequences of aberrations of monochorionic twinning may be a pair of remarkably different so-called identical twins—an argument for avoiding the term as it is not only inaccurate but potentially confusing when counseling affected families. Some of the most bizarre anomalies of human reproduction are seen in these cases—as Antonio asks of Sebastian “How have you made division of yourself?” (Shakespeare, Twelfth Night, V, i).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Schinzel AAGL, Smith DW, Miller JR. Monozygotic twins and structural defects. J Pediatr. 1979;95:921–930.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Burn J. Monozygotic twins. In: Chamberlain G, ed. Contemporary Obstetrics and Gynecology. London: Butterworth; 1988:161–176.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kalousek DK, Fitch N, Paradice BA. Pathology of the Human Embryo and Previable Fetus. An Atlas. New York: Springer Verlag; 1990:3–4.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Benirschke K, Kaufmann P. Pathology of the Human Placenta. 2nd ed. New York: Springer Verlag; 1990:648.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lumme RH, Saarikoski SV. Monoamniotic twin pregnancy.Acta Genet Med Gemellol. 1986;35:99- 105.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Nylander PPS. The value of the placenta in the determination of zygosity—a study of 1052 Nigerian twin maternities. J Obstet Gynecol Br Cwlth. 1969;76:699–704.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Soma H, Yoshida K, Tada M, Mukaida T, Kikuchi T. Fetal abnormalities associated with twin placentation (Abstract). Teratology. 1975;12:211.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Leroy F. Major fetal hazards in multiple pregnancy. Acta Genet Med Gemellol. 1976;25:299–306.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Cameron AH. The Birmingham twin survey. Proc SocMed. 1968;61:229–234.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Pauls F. Monoamniotic twin pregnancy—a review of the world literature and a report of two new cases. Can Med Assoc J. 1969;100:254–256.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Benirschke K, Kaufmann P. Pathology of the Human Placenta. 2nd ed. New York: Springer Verlag; 1990:662–676.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gilbert WM, Davis SE, Kaplan C, Pretorius D, Merritt TA, Benirschke K. Morbidity associated with prenatal dismption of the dividing membrane in twin gestations. Obstet Gynecol. 1991;78:623–630.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Quigley JK. Monoamniotic twin pregnancy. A case record with review of the literature. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1935;29:354–362.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sinykin MB. Monoamniotic triplet pregnancy with triple survival. Obstet Gynecol. 1958;12:78–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Salemo LJ. Monoamniotic twinning. A survey of the American literature since 1935 with a report of four new cases. Obstet Gynecol. 1959;14:205–213.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wharton B, Edwards JH, Cameron AH. Monoamniotic twins. J Obstet Gynecol Br Cwlth. 1968; 75:158–163.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Tessen JA, Zlatnik FJ. Monoamniotic twins: a retrospective controlled study. Obstet Gynecol. 1991; 77:832–834.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. James WH. The sex ratio of monoamniotic twin pairs. Ann Hum Biol. 1977;4:143–153.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Berry SA, Johnson DE, Thompson TR. Agenesis of the penis, scrotal raphe, and anus in one of monoamniotic twins. Teratology. 1984;29:173–176.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. van der Harten HJ, van Velzen D. Transport of squamous cells from the peritoneal cavity to axillary lymph nodes in an infant with multiple malformations. Pediatr Pathol. 1986;5:319–324.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mulder AFP, van Eyck J, Groenendaal F, Wladimiroff JW. Trisomy 18 in monozygotic twins. Hum Genet. 1989;83:300–301.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. McLeod F, McCoy DR. Monoamniotic twins with unusual cord complication (case report). Br J Obstet Gynecol. 1981;88:774–775.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Naeye RL. Disorders of the Placenta, Fetus, and Neonate: Diagnosis and Clinical Significance. St. Louis: Mosby Year Book; 1991:102–104.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kaplan C, August D, Mizrachi H. Single umbilical artery and cord accidents (Abstract). Mod Pathol. 1990;3:4P.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Golan A, Amit A, Baram A, David MP. Unusual cord intertwining in monoamniotic twins. AustNZ J Obstet Gynecol. 1982;22:165–167.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Bendon RW, Siddiqi T. Clinical pathology conference: acute twin-to-twin in utero transfusion. Pediatr Pathol. 1989;9:591–598.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Norman MG. Mechanism of brain damage in twins. Can J Neurol Sci. 1982;9:339–344.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Baldwin VJ, Wittmann BK. Pathology of intragesta- tional intervention in twin to twin transfusion syndrome. Pediatr Pathol. 1990;10:79–93.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Clark DA. Hydrops fetalis attributable to intrauterine disseminated intravascular coagulation. Clin Pediatr. 1981;20:61–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Carr SR, Aronson MP, Coustan DR. Survival rates of monoamniotic twins do not decrease after 30 weeks gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990;163: 719–722.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Watson WJ, Valea FA, Seeds JW. Sonographic evaluation of growth discordance and chorionicity in twin gestation. Am J Perinatol. 1991;8:342–344.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Tabsh K. Genetic amniocentesis in multiple gestation: a new technique to diagnose monoamniotic twins. Obstet Gynecol. 1990;75:296–298.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Perkins RP, Terry JD. Exclusion of monoamniotic twinning by contrast-enhanced computed tomography. Obstet Gynecol. 1992;79:876–878.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Megory E, Weiner E, Shalev E, Ohel G. Pseudoamniotic twins with cord entanglement following genetic funipuncture. Obstet Gynecol. 1991;78:915- 917.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer-Verlag New York Inc

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Baldwin, V.J. (1994). The Pathology of Monochorionic Monozygosity. In: Pathology of Multiple Pregnancy. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-9514-0_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-9514-0_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-9516-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-9514-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics