Skip to main content

The Role of Nature in the Urban Context

  • Chapter
Behavior and the Natural Environment

Part of the book series: Human Behavior and Environment ((HUBE,volume 6))

Abstract

Urban nature. The juxtaposition may strike some as a contradiction. If one thinks of nature as somewhere else, removed from human influence and inaccessible to major segments of the population, then it would make little sense to speak of nature in the urban context. But nature is an elusive concept. It can and does exist even in the city. In fact, in that context, nature not only survives human influence, it often depends on it.

People need contact with trees and plants and water. In some way, which is hard to express, people are able to be more whole in the presence of nature, are able to go deeper into themselves, and are somehow able to draw sustaining energy from the life of plants and trees and water. (Alexander, Ishikawa, & Silverstein, 1977, p. 806)

The author greatly appreciates the support of the Urban Forestry Project through Cooperative Agreement 13-655, U.S. Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alexander, C., Ishikawa, S., & Silverstein, M. A pattern language. New York: Oxford University Press, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartenstein, F. The future of urban forestry. Paper presented at the 10th Anniversary of the Consortium for Environmental Forestry Research, Longwood Gardens, Pa., May 1980 (available from Pinchot Institute, USDA Forest Service).

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton, T. L. Review of R. J. Burby’s Recreation and leisure in new communities. journal of Leisure Research, 1978, 10, 76–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, L. K., Hayes, L. R., & MacWhirter, I. M. (Eds.). Citizens and the environment. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R. N. Control of vandalism in recreation areas—Fact, fiction, or folklore. In Vandalism and outdoor recreation: Symposium proceedings (USDA Forest Service General Tech. Rep. PSW-17). Berkeley, Calif.: USDA Forest Service, 1976, pp. 62–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, J. J., & Munsell, K. Plant a tree for Marshall: A Michigan community honors its trees. Small Town, 1981, 11(5), 18–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, C. C. Easter Hill Village. New York: Free Press, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delaporte, C. T. Case report: Houston, the rising star in recreation’s universe. Parks and Recreation, October 1980, pp. 49–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Down on the farm in London. Urban Innovation Abroad (Newsletter of the Council for International Urban Liaison, Washington, D.C.), September 1979, p. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer, J. F. Managing urban forests for recreation. Trends, 1980, 27(4), 11–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fogel, S. Harvesting the Big Apple: Urban gardening in New York City. The Conservationist, May–June 1980, pp. 28–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foresta, R. A. Comment: Elite values, popular values, and open space policy. Journal of the American Planning Association, 1980, 46, 451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frey, J. E. Preferences, satisfactions, and the physical environments of urban neighborhoods. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, T. J. Visual preference for alternative natural landscapes. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, D., & Bonnett, P. Nature in the urban landscape. Baltimore: York Press, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gold, S. M. Social benefits of trees in urban environments. International Journal of Environmental Studies, 1977, 10, 85–90. (a)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gold, S. M. Neighborhood parks: The nonuse phenomenon. Evaluation Quarterly, 1977, 2, 319–327. (b)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greiner, J. Case report: A “Proposition 13” that works for recreation. Parks and Recreation, June 1979, pp. 29–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halkett, I. P. B. The recreational use of private gardens. Journal of Leisure Research, 1978, 10, 13–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckscher, A. Open spaces: The life of American cities. New York: Harper & Row, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • eritage Conservation and Recreation Service (HCRS). The Urban Park and Recreation Recovery Program (undated).

    Google Scholar 

  • Herzog, T. R., Kaplan, S., & Kaplan, R. The prediction of preference for unfamiliar urban places. Population and Environment, 1982, 5, 43–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, P. The Parrish Community Park. Mother Earth News, 1980, 66, 28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hounsome, M. Bird life in the city. In I. C. Laurie (Ed.), Nature in cities. Chichester, England: Wiley, 1979, pp. 179–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, William. The varieties of religious experience. New York: Holt, 1902.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jellicoe, G., & Jellicoe, S. The landscape of man. London: Thames & Hudson, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R. Some psychological benefits of gardening. Environment and Behavior, 1973, 5, 145–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R. Some methods and strategies in the prediction of preference. In E. H. Zube, R. O. Brush, & J. G. Fabos (Eds.), Landscape assessment. Stroudsburg, Pa.: Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross, 1975, pp. 118–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R. Preference and everyday nature: Method and application. In D. Stokols (Ed.), Perspectives on environment and behavior. New York: Plenum Press, 1977, pp. 235–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R. The green experience. In S. Kaplan & R. Kaplan (Eds.), Humanscape: Environments for people. Belmont, Calif.: Duxbury Press, 1978, pp. 186–193. (Ann Arbor, Mich.: Ulrich’s, 1982) (a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R. Participation in environmental design. In S. Kaplan & R. Kaplan (Eds.), Humanscape: Environments for people. Belmont, Calif.: Duxbury Press, 1978, pp. 427–438. (Ann Arbor, Mich.: Ulrich’s, 1982) (b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R. A methodology for simultaneously obtaining and sharing information. In Assessing amenity resource values (USDA Forest Service General Technical Report RM-68). Fort Collins, Colo.: USDA Forest Service, 1979, pp. 58–66. (a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R. Visual resources and the public: An empirical approach. In Proceedings of Our National Landscape Conference (USDA Forest Service General Tech. Rep. PSW-35).

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkeley, Calif.: USDA Forest Service, 1979, pp. 209–216. (b)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R. Citizen participation in the design and evaluation of a park. Environment and Behavior, 1980, 12, 494–507.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R. Evaluation of an urban vest-pocket park (USDA Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station Research Paper NC-195). St. Paul, Minn.: USDA Forest Service, 1981, 12 p. (a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R. Nearby nature and satisfaction with multiple-family neighborhoods. Report to the Planning Department, City of Ann Arbor, Michigan, 1981. (b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, S. An informal model for the prediction of preference. In E. H. Zube, R. O. Brush, & J. G. Fabos (Eds.), Landscape assessment. Stroudsburg, Pa.: Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross, 1975, pp. 92–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, S. Adaptation, structure and knowledge. In G. T. Moore & R. G. Golledge (Eds.), Environmental knowing. Stroudsburg, Pa.: Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross, 1976, pp. 32–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, S. Tranquility and challenge in the natural environment. In Children, nature, and the urban environment (USDA Forest Service General Tech. Rep. NE-30). Upper Darby, Pa.: USDA Forest Service, 1977, pp. 181–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, S. Concerning the power of content-identifying methodologies. In Assessing amenity resource values (USDA Forest Service General Tech. Rep. RM-68). Fort Collins, Colo.: USDA Forest Service, 1979, pp. 4–13. (a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, S. Perception and landscape: Conception and misconceptions. In Proceedings of our national landscape conference (USDA Forest Service General Tech. Rp. PSW-35). Berkeley, Calif.: USDA Forest Service, 1979, pp. 241248. (b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, S., & Kaplan, R. (Eds.). Humanscape: Environments for people. Belmont, Calif.: Duxbury Press, 1978. (Ann Arbor, Mich.: Ulrich’s, 1982)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, S., Kaplan, R., & Wendt, J. S. Rated preference and complexity for natural and urban visual material. Perception and Psychophysics, 1972, 12, 354–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laurie, M. Nature and city planning in the nineteenth century. In I. C. Laurie (Ed.), Nature in cities. Chichester, England: Wiley, 1979, pp. 37–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Les Amis de la Terre. Ecopolis: The new city of light. Reprinted in Not Man Apart (Friends of the Earth), March 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, C. A. Public housing gardens—Landscapes for the soul. In Landscape for living. Washington, D.C.: USDA Yearbook of Agriculture, 1972, pp. 277–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, C. A. Human perspectives in horticulture. In Children, nature, and the urban environment (USDA Forest Service General Tech. Rep. NE-30). Upper Darby, Pa.: USDA Forest Service, 1977, pp. 187–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, C. A. Healing in the urban environment: A person/plant viewpoint. Journal of the American Planning Association, 1979, 45, 330–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lingoes, J. C. A general survey of the Guttman-Lingoes nonmetric program series. In R. N. Shepard, A. K. Romney,& S. B. Nerlove (Eds.), Multidimensional scaling (Vol. 1). New York: Seminar Press, 1972, pp. 52–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, C. E. The double standard of open space. In J. N. Smith (Ed.), Environmental quality and social justice in urban America. Washington, D.C.: Conservation Foundation, 1974, pp. 73–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • London’s Hyde Park remains a quiet sanctuary. New York Times, May 26, 1977, p. 33. Magill, A. W. The message of vandalism. In Vandalism and outdoor recreation: Symposium Proceedings (USDA Forest Service Tech. Rep. PSW-17). 1976, pp. 50–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning, O. Designing for nature in cities. In I. C. Laurie (Ed.), Nature in cities. Chichester, England: Wiley, 1979, pp. 3–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadel, I. B., & Oberlander, C. H. Trees in the city. New York: Pergamon, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, O. Defensible space. New York: MacMillan, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitt, D., Soergell, K., & Zube, E. Trees in the city. In I. C. Laurie (Ed.), Nature in cities. Chischester, England: Wiley, 1979, pp. 205–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reilly, W. K. (Ed.). The use of land: A citizen’s policy guide to urban growth. New York: Crowell, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowntree, R. A., & Wolfe, J. L. Abstracts of urban forestry research in progress–1979 (USDA Forest Service General Tech. Rep. NE-60). Upper Darby, Pa.: USDA Forest Service, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seymour, W. N., Jr. (Ed.). Small urban spaces. New York: New York University Press, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sudia, T. W. Urban ecology series. Washington, D.C.: Department of Interior, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. L. (Ed.). The urban setting: Man’s need for open space. Symposium proceedings, Connecticut College, New London, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thayer, R. L., & Atwood, B. G. Plants, complexity, and pleasure in urban and suburban environments. Environmental Psychology and Nonverbal Behavior, 1978, 3, 67–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, R. S., & Addoms, D. L. Psychological and recreational benefits of a residential park. Journal of Leisure Research, 1981, 13, 43–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urban parks. Info (Newsletter of Heritage Conservation and Recreation Service), December 1980, p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogt, W. Population patterns and movements. In F. F. Darling & J. P. Milton (Eds.), Future environments of North America. New York: Natural History Press, 1966, pp. 372–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whyte, W. H. The social life of small urban spaces. Washington, D.C.: The Conservation Foundation, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whyte, W. H. The social life of small urban spaces. Washington, D.C.: The Conservation Foundation, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1983 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kaplan, R. (1983). The Role of Nature in the Urban Context. In: Altman, I., Wohlwill, J.F. (eds) Behavior and the Natural Environment. Human Behavior and Environment, vol 6. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-3539-9_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-3539-9_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-3541-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-3539-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics