Abstract
The electrical activity of cardiac muscle cells is projected to the surface of the torso by means of the intervening conducting medium. The surface potentials that are recorded as electrocardiograms reflect, therefore, the properties of both the heart electrical generators and the surrounding passive volume conductor. Since the goal of electrocardiography is to reconstruct cardiac electrical events from body surface potential data, understanding the role played by the torso volume conductor in determining the surface potential distribution is essential. The major part of this chapter deals with the results of a theoretical simulation in which the electrocardiographic volume conductor is represented by a spherical “heart” eccentrically located in a spherical “torso.” This idealized model permits a systematic study of the effects of the various torso compartments (inhomogeneities) on the electrocardiogram. Results of other theoretical and experimental studies, as well as electrocardiographic clinical observations are discussed in relation to the findings of the eccentric spheres model. The section dealing with the model simulations is preceded by a discussions of the electrical properties of the various torso inhomogeneities and their representation in terms of equivalent sources.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Plonsey R, Heppner D. Considerations of quasi-stationarity in electrophysiological systems. Bull Math Biophys 29:657, 1967.
Jackson WD. Classical Electrodynamics. New York: John Wiley, 1962.
Schwan HP, Kay CF. The conductivity of living tissues. Ann NY Acad Sci 65:1007, 1957.
Geddes LA, Baker LE. The specific resistance of biological material—A compendium of data for the biomedical engineer and physiologist. Med Biol Eng 5:271, 1967.
Rush S, Abildskov JA, McFee R. Resistivity of body tissues at low frequencies. Circ Res 12:40, 1963.
Schwan HP, and Kay CF. Specific resistance of body tissues. Circ Res 4:664, 1956.
Cobbold RSC. Transducers for Biomedical Measurements. New York: J Wiley, 1974.
Rush S, Nelson CV. The effects of electrical inhomogeneity and anisotropy of thoracic tissues on the field of the heart. In CV Nelson and DB Geselowitz (eds.), The Theoretical Basis of Electrocardiology. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1976, pp. 323–354.
Maxwell JC. A Treatise on electricity and Magnetism, vol. 1. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1904.
Cole KS, Curtis HJ. Bioelectricity, electric physiology. In O Glasser (ed.), Medical Physics, vol. II. Chicago: The Year Book Publishers, 1944.
Burger HC, and Van Milaan JB. Measurement of the specific resistance of the human body to direct current. Acta Med Scand, 114:584, 1943.
Burger HC, and Van Dongen R. Specific electric resistance of body tissues. Phys Med Biol 5:431, 1961.
Hirsch FG Texter EC, Wood LA, Ballard WC, Horan FC, Wright MD. The electrical conductivity of blood. 1. Relationship to erythrocyte concentration. Blood 5:1017, 1950.
Rosenthal RL, Tobias CW. Measurement of the electrical resistance of human blood; use in coagulation studies and cell volume determinations. J Lab Clin Med 33: 1110, 1948.
Molnar GW, Nyboer J, Levine RL. The effect of temperature and flow on the specific resistance of human venous blood. U.S. Army Medical Research Laboratory Report, Fort Knox, KY. Rep. 127. Project 6-64-12-028, pp. 1–118, 1953.
Rush S. Methods of measuring the resistivities of anisotropic conducting media in situ. J Res Natn Bur Stand 66c:217, 1962.
Plonsey R. Laws governing current flow in the volume conductor. In CV Nelson and DB Geselowitz (eds.), The Theoretical Basis of Electrocardiology. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1976.
Geselowitz DB. On bioelectric potentials in an inhomogeneous volume conductor. Biophys J 7:1, 1967.
Panofsky WH, and Phillips M. Classical Electricity and Magnetism. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1962.
Plonsey R. Bioelectric Phenomena. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1969.
McFee R, Rush S. Qualitative effects of thoracic resistivity variations on the interpretation of electrocardiograms: The low-resistance surface layer. Am Heart J 76:48, 1968.
Rudy Y, Plonsey R. The eccentric spheres model as the basis for a study of the role of geometry and inhomogeneities in electrocardiography. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 26:392, 1979.
Rush S. Inhomogeneities as a cause of multiple peaks of heart potential on the body surface: Theoretical studies. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 18:115, 1971.
Taccardi B, D’Alchè P. Vérification of experimentale dùne method mathématique pour le calcul de la distribution des potentiels engendrés par un dipole dans un milieu conducteur non homogène. J Physiologie 57:281, 1965.
Geselowitz DB, Ishiwatari H. A theoretic study of the effect of the intracavitary blood mass on the dipolarity of an equivalent heart generator. In I Hoffman (ed.), Vectorcardiology—1965. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1966, pp. 393–402.
Okada RH An experimental study of multiple dipole potentials and the effects of inhomogeneities in volume conductors. Am Heart J 54:567, 1957.
Horan L, Flowers N, Brody D. Body surface potential distribution; comparison of naturally and artificially produced signals as analyzed by digital computer. Circ Res 13:373, 1963.
Gulrajani RM, Mailloux GE. A simulation study of the effects of torso inhomogeneities on electrocardiographic potentials, using realistic heart and torso models. Circ Res 52:45, 1983.
Rudy, Y, Plonsey R. A comparison of volume conductor and source geometry effects on body surface and epicardial potentials. Circ Res 46: 283, 1980.
King TD, Barr RC, Herman-Giddens GS, Boaz DE, Spach MS. Isopotential body surface maps and their relationship to atrial potentials in the dog. Circ Res 20:393, 1972.
Spach MS, Barr RC, Lanning CF, Tucek PC. Origin of body surface QRS and T wave potentials distributions in the intact chimpanzee. Circulation 55:268, 1977.
Spach MS, Barr RC, Lanning CF. Experimental basis for QRS and T wave potential distributions in the intact chimpanzee. Circ Res 42:103, 1978.
Ramsey M III, Barr RC, Spach MS. Comparison of measured torso potentials with those simulated from epicardial potentials for ventricular depolarization and repolarization in the intact dog. Circ Res 41:660, 1977.
Abildskov JA, Burgess MJ, Lux RL, Wyatt RF. Experimental evidence for regional cardiac influence in body surface isopotential maps of dogs. Circ Res 38:386, 1976.
Taccardi B. Contribution a la determination quantitative des erreurs de la vectorcardiographie. Arch Int Physiol 59:63, 1951.
Taccardi B. La distribution spatiale des potentials cardiaques. Acta Cardiol 13:173, 1958.
Taccardi B, Musso E, and DeAmbroggi L. Current and potential distribution around an isolated dog heart. In P Rijlant (ed.), Proceedings of the Satellite Symposium of the 25th International Congress on Physiological Science (The Electrical Field of the Heart) and the 12th Colloquium Vectorcardiographicum. Brussels: Presses Academiques Europenées, pp. 566–512, 1972.
DeAmbroggi L, Taccardi B. Current and potential fields generated by two dipoles. Circ Res 27:901, 1970.
Mirvis DM, Keller FW, Ideker RE, Cox JW, Zettergren DG, Dowdie RF. Values and limitations of surface isopotential mapping techniques in the detection and localization of multiple discrete epicardial events. J Electrocardiol 10:347 1977.
Brody DA. A theoretical analysis of intracavitary blood mass influence on the heart—lead relationship. Circ Res 4:731, 1956.
Rudy Y, Plonsey R. A note on the “Brody-Effect.” J Electrocardiol 11:87, 1978.
Rudy Y, Plonsey R, Liebman J. The effects of variations in conductivity and geometrical parameters on the electrocardiogram, using an eccentric spheres model. Circ Res 44:104, 1979.
Liebman J, Thomas CW, Rudy Y, Plonsey R. Electrocardiographic body surface potential maps of the QRS of normal children. J Electrocardiol 14:249, 1981.
Miller WT, Geselowitz DB. Simulation studies of the electrocardiogram. I. The normal heart. Circ Res 43:301, 1978.
Nelson CV, Rand PW, Angelakos ET, Hugenholtz PG. Effect of intracardiac blood on the spatial vectorcardiogram. 1. Results in the dog. Circ Res 31:95, 1972.
Rosenthal A, Restieauz NJ, Feig SA. Influence of acute variations in hematocrit on the QRS complex of the Frank electrocardiogram. Circulation 44:456, 1971.
Manoach M, Gitter S, Grossman E, Varon D. The relation between the conductivity of the blood and the body tissue and the amplitude of the QRS during heart filling and pericardial compression in the cat. Am Heart J 84:72, 1972.
Kramer DA, Hamlin RL, and Weed HR. Effects of pericardial effusates of various conductivities on body surface potentials in dogs—documentation of the eccentric spheres model. Circ Res 55:788, 1984.
Arthur RM, Geselowitz DB. Effect of inhomogeneities on the apparent location and magnitude of a cardiac current dipole source. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 17:141, 1970.
Burch GE, DePasquale NP. Electrocardiographic diagnosis of pulmonary heart disease. Am J Cardiol 2:622, 1963.
Wasserburger RH, Kelle JR, Rasmussen BS, Juhl JH. The electrocardiographic pentalogy of pulmonary emphysema. Circulation 20:831, 1959.
Selvester RH, Rubin HB. New criteria for the electrocardiographic diagnosis of emphysema and cor pulmonale. Am Heart J 69:437, 1965.
Littman D. The electrocardiographic findings in pulmonary emphysema. Am J Cardiol 5:339, 1960.
Kerr A, Adicoff A, Klingeman JD, Pipberger HV. Computer analysis of the orthogonal electrocardiogram in pulmonary emphysema. Am J Cardiol 25:34, 1970.
Flaherty JT, Blumenschein SD, Spock A, Canent RV, Gallie TM, Boineau JP, Spach MS. Cardiac potentials in pulmonary disease: Over-distension of the lung versus cor pulmonale (right ventricular hypertrophy). Am J Cardiol 20:29, 1967.
Toyama J, Okada A, Nagata Y, Okajima M, Yamada K. Electrocardiographic changes in pulmonary emphysema: Effects of experimentally induced over-inflation of the lungs on QRS complexes. Am Heart J 87:606, 1974.
Van De Water JM, Mount BE, Barela JR, Schuster R, Leacock FS. Monitoring the chest impedance. Chest 64:597, 1973.
Rudy Y, Wood R, Plonsey R, Liebman J. The effect of high lung conductivity on electrocardiographic potentials-results from human subjects undergoing bronchopulmonary lavage. Circulation 65:440, 1982.
Barr RC, Spach MS. Inverse solutions directly in terms of potentials. In CV Nelson and DB Geselowitz (eds.), The Theoretical Basis of Electrocardiology. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1976, pp. 294–304.
Rudy Y. Critical aspects of the forward and inverse problems in electrocardiography. In S Sideman and R Beyar (eds.), Simulation and Imaging of the Cardiac System. Amdrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1985 pp. 279–298.
Rudy Y, Plonsey R. Comments on the effect of variations in the size of the heart on the magnitude of ECG potentials. J Electrocardiol 13:79, 1980.
Manoach M, Gitter S, Grossman E, Varon D, Gassner S. Influence of hemorrhage on the QRS complex of the electrocardiogram. Am Heart J 82:55, 1971.
Manoach M, Gassner S, Grossman E, Varon D, Gitter S. Influence of cardiac filling on the amplitude of the QRS complex in normal cats. Israel J Med Sci 8:566, 1972.
Angelakos ET, Gokhan N. Influence of venous inflow volume on the magnitude of the QRS potentials in-vivo. Cardiologia 43:337, 1963.
Ishikawa K, Berson AS, Pipberger HW Electrocardiographic changes due to cardiac enlargement. Am Heart J 81:635, 1971.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1987 Martinus Nijhoff Publishing
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rudy, Y. (1987). The Effects of the Thoracic Volume Conductor (Inhomogeneities) on the Electrocardiogram. In: Liebman, J., Plonsey, R., Rudy, Y. (eds) Pediatric and Fundamental Electrocardiography. Developments in Cardiovascular Medicine, vol 56. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-2323-5_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-2323-5_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-9428-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-2323-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive