Skip to main content

Clinical Evaluation of Anticancer Treatments: Phase II Clinical Trials

  • Chapter
Clinical Evaluation of Antitumor Therapy

Part of the book series: Developments in Oncology ((DION,volume 46))

Abstract

One of the main goals of research oncologists is to identify agents that demonstrate antitumor activity and to translate this property into prolonged survival leading to increased cure rates. Phase II trials were instituted to facilitate this process and are designed as preliminary clinical screening of a new regimen in a homogeneous patient population with a particular tumor type. The decision to pursue or discontinue the treatment depends on the outcome of the evaluation. Ideally, treatments that do not yield a required level of effectiveness should be used in the smallest number of patients. On the other hand, considering the enormous progress that remains to be achieved in cancer chemotherapy, the most serious failure of a phase II trial is to reject a useful compound. Once a drug is labeled inactive, future development is unlikely.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Devita V, Oliverio V, Muggia F, et al. The drug development and clinical trials program of the Division of Cancer Treatment, National Cancer Institute. Cancer Clin Trials 2: 195, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Venditti J. Preclinical drug development: Rationale and methods. Sem Oncol 8: 349, 1981.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Von Hoff D, Coltman C, Forseth B. Activity of 9,10-anthracenedicarboxyaldehyde bis(4,5 dihydro-1 H-imidazol-2-yl)hydrazone dihydrochloride (CL 216,942) in a human tumor cloning system: Leads for phase II trials in man. Cancer Chemother Pharm 6: 141, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Scher H, Schwartz S, Yagoda A, et al. Phase II trial of bisantrene for advanced hypernephroma. Cancer Treat Rep 66: 1653, 1982.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Rozencweig M, Von Hoff D, Staquet M. New anticancer drugs: Mitoxantrone and bisantrene. EORTC Trials. New York: Raven Press, 1984, p. 194.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Regelson W, Holland J. Initial study of parenteral methylglyoxal bis(guanylhydrazone) diacetate. Cancer Chemother Rep 11: 81, 1961.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Knight W, Livingston R, Fabian C, et al. Phase I–II trial of methyl GAG: A Southwest Oncology Group Pilot. Cancer Treat Rep 63: 1933, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Warrell R, Burchenal J. Methylglyoxal bis (guanylhydrazone) (Methyl-GAG): Current status and future prospects. J Clin Oncol 1: 52, 1983.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Capizzi R, Keiser W, Sartorelli A. Combination chemotherapy—theory and practice. Sem Oncol 4: 227, 1977.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gehan E. The determination of the number of patients required in a follow-up trial of a new chemotherapeutic agent. J Chron Dis 13: 346, 1961.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Livingston R. Small cell carcinoma of the lung. Blood 56: 575, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Comis R. Small cell carcinoma of the lung. Cancer Treat Rev 9: 237, 1982.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Scher H, Hilaris B, Wittes R. Long term follow-up of combined modality therapy in small cell carcinoma (SCLC) of the lung. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 2:C-177, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Morstyn G, Ihde D, Lichter A, et al. Small cell lung cancer 1973–1983: Early progress and recent obstacles. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 515, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pedersen A, Hansen H. Etoposide (VP-16) in the treatment of lung cancer. Cancer Treat Rev 10: 245, 1983.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Eagan R, Carr D, Frytak S, et al. VP-16-213 versus polychemotherapy in patients with advanced small cell lung cancer. Cancer Treat Rep 60: 949, 1976.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hansen M, Hirsch F, Dombernofsky P. Treatment of small cell anaplastic carcinoma of the lung with the oral solution of VP-16-23 (NSC 141540, 4-demethyl-epipodophyllotoxin 9-(4,6,0-ethylidene-beta-D-glucanicyanoside). Cancer 40: 633, 1977.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Tucker R, Ferguson A, Van Wyck C, et al. Chemotherapy of small cell carcinoma of the lung with VP-16-213._Cancer 41: 1710, 1978.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Cohen M, Broder L, Fossieck B, et al. Phase II clinical trial of weekly administration of VP-16-213 in small cell bronchogenic carcinoma. Cancer Treat Rep 61: 489, 1977.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Nissen N, Pajak T, Leone L, et al. Clinical trial of VP-16-213 (NSC 141540) IV twice weekly in neoplastic disease. Cancer 45: 232, 1980.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Tempuro M, Kessinger A, Lemon H. VP-16-213 therapy in patients with small cell carcinoma of the lung after failure on combination chemotherapy. Cancer Clin Trials 4: 155, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Harper P, Dally M, Geddes D, et al. Epipophophyllotoxin (VP-16) in small cell carcinoma of the bronchus resistant to combination chemotherapy. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 7: 179, 1982.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Harland S, Smith I, Smith N, et al. Phase II study of cis-diammine-1,1-cyclobutane dicar-boxylate platinum (II) (CBDCA, JM-8) in carcinoma of the bronchus. In Platinum Coordination Complexes in Cancer Chemotherapy, Hacker M, Douple E, Krakoff I (eds.). Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishing, 1984, p. 353.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Einhorn L. Testicular cancer as a model for a curable neoplasm. The Richard and Hinda Rosenthal Award Lecture. Can Res 41: 3275, 1981.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Bosl G, Geller N, Cirincione C, et al. Complete remission in patients with metastatic testicular cancer: A multivariate analysis of prognostic variables. Cancer Res 43: 3403, 1983.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Moertel C. Current concepts in cancer: Chemotherapy of gastrointestinal cancer. N Engl J Med 299: 1049, 1978.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Luckart S, Kennealey G, Kirkwood J. Randomized phase II trial of vinblastine, bleomycin and cis-dichlorodiammine platinum versus dacarbazine in malignant melanoma. J Clin Oncol 2: 164, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Yagoda A. Cytotoxic agents in prostate cancer: An enigma. Sem Urol 1: 311, 1983.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Khandekar J, Elson P, DeWys W, the ECOG. Improved activity and toxicity of cyclophos-phamide, adriamycin and cis-diamminedichloroplatinum II combination as compared to DDP in disseminated transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary tract. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 2:C-560, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Soloway M, Einstein A, Corder M, et al. A comparison of cisplatin and combination of cisplatin and cyclophosphamide in advanced urothelial cancer. A National Bladder Cancer Collaborative Group A Study. Cancer 52: 767–772, 1983.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Henderson E, Canellos G. Cancer of the breast. N Engl J Med 302:17, 77, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Paulsen D, Berry W, Cox E, et al. Chemotherapy of prostatic cancer. In Cancer of the Genitourinary Tract, Johnson D, Samuels M (eds.). New York: Raven Press, 1979, p. 261.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Hayward J, Carbone P, Heuson J, et al. Assessment of response to therapy in advanced breast cancer. Br J Cancer 37: 292, 1977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Mittal R, Korval C, Starzl T, et al. Accuracy of computerized tomography (CT) in determining hepatic tumor size in patients (PTS) receiving liver transplants or resection. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 2: 121, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Selawry O. The role of chemotherapy in the treatment of lung cancer. Sem Oncol 1: 259, 1974.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Hurley J, Ellison E. Chemotherapy of solid cancer arising from the gastrointestinal tract. Ann Surg 152: 568, 1960.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. O’Bryan R, Luce J, Talley R, et al. Phase II evaluation of adriamycin in human neoplasia. Cancer 32: 1, 1973.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Eagan R, Hahn R, Myers R. Adriamycin 9NSC-123127) versus 5-fluorouracil (NSC 19893) and cyclophosphamide (NSC-26271) in the treatment of metastatic prostate cancer. Cancer Treat Rep 60: 115, 1976.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. O’Bryan R, Baker L, Gottlieb J, et al. Dose response evaluation of adriamycin in human neoplasia. Cancer 39: 8, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Smith P. Endocrine and cytotoxic therapy. In Recent Results in Cancer Research: Prostate Cancer, vol. 78, Duncan W (ed.). Berlin: Springer Verlag, 1981, p. 154.

    Google Scholar 

  41. DeWys W, Begg C, Brodovsky H, et al. A comparative trial of adriamycin and 5-fluorouracil in advanced prostatic cancer: Prognostic factors and response. The Prostate 4: 1, 1983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Scher H, Yagoda A, Watson R. Phase II trial of adriamycin in bidimensionally measurable hormone resistant adenocarcinoma of the prostate. J Urol 131: 1099, 1984.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Torti F, Aston D, Lum B, et al. Weekly doxorubicin in endocrine refractory carcinoma of the prostate. J Clin Oncol 1: 477, 1983.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Glode L, Max D, et al. Leuprolide (D-Leu6-DesGly10-Pro9-NH Et-LHRH) in the therapy of advanced prostatic carcinoma. 13th Int Cong Chemotherapy 12.1.8._A. Section 242: 49, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Hoogstraten B, Fabian C. A reappraisal of single drugs in advanced breast cancer. Cancer Clin Traisl 2: 101, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Moertel C, Hanley J. The effect of measuring error on the results of therapeutic trials in advanced cancer. Cancer 38: 388, 1976.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Warr D, McKinney S, Tannock I. Influence of measurement error on assessment of tumor response. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 2: 226, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Fisher R, Hubbard S, DeVita V, et al. Factors predicting long term survival in diffuse, mixed histiocytic or undifferentiated lymphoma. Blood 58: 45, 1981.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Scher H, Bosl G, Geller N, et al. Long term follow-up of patients (PTS) with testicular germ cell tumors (GCT) achieving complete remission (CR) after chemotherapy alone (CT) or CT plus surgery (CT+S). Proc Am Assoc Cancer Res 24: 621, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Smith I. Measuring response in incurable cancer. In Cancer Treatment: End Point Evaluation, Stroll B (ed.). New York: John Wiley, 1983, pp. 23–42.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Tannock I, Murphy K. Reflections in medical oncology: An appeal for better clinical trials and improved reporting of their results. J Clin Oncol 1: 66, 1983.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Fidler I, Hart I. Biologic diversity in metastatic neoplasms: Origins and implications. Science 217: 998, 1982.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Spremulli E, Dexter D. Human tumor cell heterogeneity and metastases. J Clin Oncol 1: 496, 1983.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Bosl G, Lange P, Nochomovitz L, et al. Tumor markers in advanced nonseminomatous germ cell tumors. Cancer 47: 572, 1981.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Lokich J, Ellenberg S, Gerson B. Criteria for monitoring carcinoembryonic antigen: Variability of sequential assays at elevated levels. J Clin Oncol 2: 181, 1984.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Bast R, Klug T, St. John E, et al. A radioimmunoassay for monitoring patients with epithelial ovarian carcinoma: Comparison of CA125 and CEA. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 2: 11, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Nissenkorn I, Mickey D, Miller D, et al. Circadian and day to day variation of prostatic acid phosphatase. J Urol 128: 1122, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Kane R, Stocks L, Paulson D. Multiple drug chemotherapy regimen for patients with hormonally unresponsive carcinoma of the prostate: A preliminary report. J Urol 117: 467, 1977.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Schmidt J, Gibbons R, Johnson D, et al. Chemotherapy of advanced prostatic cancer, evaluation of response parameters. Unology 7: 602, 1976.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Citrin D, Cohen A, Harberg J, et al. Systemic treatment of advanced prostatic cancer: Development of a new system for defining response. J Urol 125: 224–227, 1981.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Logothetis C, Samuels M, von Eschenbach A, et al. Doxorubicin, mitomycin-C, and 5-fluorouracil (DMF) in the treatment of hormonal refractory adenocarcinoma of the prostate with a note on the staging of metastatic prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 1: 368, 1983.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Paulsen D, Berry W, Cox E, et al. Treatment of metastatic endocrine unresponsive carcinoma of the prostate gland with multi-agent chemotherapy: Indicators of response to treatment. J Nat Cancer Inst 63: 311–320, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Emrich L, Priore R, Murphy G, et al. Prognostic factors in patients with advanced stage prostate cancer. Cancer Res 45: 5173, 1985.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. The Gastrointestinal Tumor Study Group. Randomized study of combination chemotherapy in unresectable gastric cancer. Cancer 53: 13, 1984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Hopkins S, Nissenkorn I, Palmieri A, et al. Serial spot hydroxyproline/creatinine ratios in metastatic prostatic cancer. J Urol 129: 319, 1983.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Miller A, Hoogstraten B, Staquet M, et al. Reporting results of cancer treatment. Cancer 47: 207, 1981.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. WHO Handbook for reporting results of cancer treatment. WHO, Geneva, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Juret P, Codetta J, Delozier T, et al. N-methyl-9-hydroxy-ellipticinium (NSC 264-137) in the treatment of bone metastases from breast cancer. Bull Cancer (Pris) 68: 224, 1981.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Orr D, Ettinger D, Rice A, et al. Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of N-methyl formamide. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 2: 24, c-93, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Yap B, Bodey G, Loo T, et al. A phase I evaluation and clinical pharmacology of 9,10 anthracenedicarboxaldehydra-bis((4,5-dihydro IH-imidazol-2-yl)hydrazone) dihydrochloride (ADD) (CL 216,942). Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 22: 175, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Warrell R, Coonley C, Straus D, et al. Clinical evaluation of gallium nitrate (NSC-15200) by a 7-day continuous infusion in advanced malignant lymphoma. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 19: 198, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Powis G, Ames M, Kovach J. Metabolic conversion of indicine-N-oxide to indicine in rabbits and humans. Cancer Res 39: 3564, 1979.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Earhart R, Koeller J, Davis T, et al. Phase I trial and pharmacokinetics of acivicin administered by 72-hour infusion. Cancer Treat Rep 67: 683, 1983.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Fleming I. One sample multiple testing procedure for phase II clinical trials. Biometrics 38: 143, 1982.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Prestayko A, D’Aoust J, Issell B, et al. Cisplain (cis-diamminedichloroplatinum II). Cancer Treat Rev 6: 17, 1979.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Guarino A, Miller D, Arnold S, et al. Platinate toxicity: Past, present and prospects. Can Treat Rep 63: 1475, 1979.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. Von Hoff D, Schilsky R, Reichert C, et al. Toxic effects of cisdichlorodiammine platinum (II) in man. Cancer Treat Rep 63: 1527, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Rose W, Schurig J, Huftalen J, et al. Antitumor activity and toxicity of cisplatin analogs. Cancer Treat Rep 66: 135, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Calvert A, Harland S, Harrap K, et al. JM-8 Development and clinical projects. In Platinum Coordination Complexes in Cancer Chemotherapy, Hacker M, Douple E, Krakoff I (eds.). Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishing, 1984, p. 240.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1987 Martinus Nijhoff Publishing, Boston

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Scher, H.I., Geller, N.L., Muggia, F.M., Rozencweig, M. (1987). Clinical Evaluation of Anticancer Treatments: Phase II Clinical Trials. In: Muggia, F.M., Rozencweig, M. (eds) Clinical Evaluation of Antitumor Therapy. Developments in Oncology, vol 46. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-2317-4_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-2317-4_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-9425-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-2317-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics