Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Characteristics of the Virus

  • Chapter
Classical Swine Fever and Related Viral Infections

Part of the book series: Developments in Veterinary Virology ((DVVI,volume 5))

Abstract

In 1903 de Schweinitz and Dorset (1) described the serial transmission of hog cholera (HC) using body fluids of diseased pigs. The fluids had been filtrated through ‘finest porcelain filters’, thus indicating that the causative agent of hog cholera was a filtrable substance rather than the ‘hog cholera bacillus’. These first attempts to characterize hog cholera virus (HCV) particles were followed by experiments using more advanced filtration techniques, electron microscopy, electrophoresis, and ultracentrifugation. Probably due to technical difficulties early results were inconsistent. Table 1 summarizes the attempts to assess the size of HCV particles (2–24). Kernkamp (2) calculated a size of smaller than 35 nm after filtration of the virus through collodion membranes. An even smaller size of 15–25 nm was determined by Pehl and Gralheer (4). However, in more recent filtration studies (6, 9, 11) particle sizes varied from approximately 29 nm to 50 nm. In experiments by Kubin (9), e.g., pigs only seroconverted after being inoculated with filtrates from membranes with a pore size of 35–100 nm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. de Schweinitz EA, Dorset M: New factors concerning the etiology of hog cholera. USDA 20th Ann Rep BAI: 157–162, 1904

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kernkamp HCH: Some of the physico-chemical properties of the virus of hog cholera. J Am Vet Med Ass (74): 844–863, 1929

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Reagan RL, Brueckner AL, Poelma LJ: Morphologic studies of hog cholera virus by electron microscopy. Am J Vet Res (12): 116–117, 1951

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Pehl KH, Grahlheer H: Untersuchungen zur Grössenbestimmung des Schweinepestvirus durch Ultrafiltration. Arch Exp Vet Med (10): 699–701, 1956

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ageev IY: Study by electron microscopy of swine fever virus in blood of infected pigs. Vopros Virusologii (Moscow) (3): 221–225, 1958

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ageev IY: Study by electron microscopy of swine fever virus in blood of infected pigs. Vopros Virusologii (Moscow) (28): 713, 1958)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dinter Z: Relationship between bovine virus diarrhoea virus and hog cholera virus. Zbl Bakt Paras I Orig (188): 457–486, 1963

    Google Scholar 

  8. Horzinek M: Characterization of hog cholera virus. II. Determination of sedimentation coefficient. Arch ges Virusforsch (21): 447–453, 1967

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Horzinek M, Reczko E, Petzoldt K: On the morphology of hog cholera virus. Arch ges Virusforsch (21): 475–478, 1967

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kubin G: In vitro Merkmale des Schweinepestvirus. Zbl Vet Med (14): 543–552, 1967

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Mayr A, Bachmann PA, Sheffy BE, Siegl G: Electron optical and buoyant density studies of hog cholera virus. Arch ges Virusforsch (21): 113–119, 1967

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Mayr A, Bachmann PA, Sheffy BE, Siegl G: Morphological characteristics of swine fever virus. Vet Rec (82): 745–746, 1968

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cunliffe HR, Rebers PA: The purification and concentration of hog cholera virus with electron micrographs. Can J Comp Med (32): 409–411, 1968

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ritchie AE, Fernelius AL: Electron microscopy of hog cholera virus and its antigen-antibody complex. Vet Rec (81): 417–418, 1967

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ritchie AE, Fernelius AL: Direct immuno-electron microscopy and some morphological features of hog cholera virus. Arch ges Virusforsch (23): 292–298, 1968

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ushimi C, Tajima M, Tanaka S, Nakajima H, Shimizu Y, Furuushi S: Purification and some physical properties of hog cholera virus. Natl Inst Anim Hlth Quart (Tokyo) (9): 28–34, 1969

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Cheville NF, Mengeling WL: The pathogenesis of chronic hog cholera (swine fever). Lab Invest (20): 261–274, 1969

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Hantschel H: Abschätzung der Größe von Viren durch Gelelektrophorese. Arch Exp Vet Med (24): 571–580, 1970

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Scherrer R, Aynaud JM, Cohen J, Bic E: Etude au microscope electronique du virus de la peste porcine classique (hog cholera) dans des coupes ultra-fines de cellules infectées in vitro. CR Acad Sc Paris (271): 620–623, 1970

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Schulze P: Elektronenmikroskopische Untersuchungen zum Nachweis des Schweinepestvirus in Zellen des Lymphknotens erkrankter Schweine. Arch Exp Vet Med (25): 413–425, 1971

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Horzinek M, Maess J, Laufs R: Studies on the substructure of togaviruses. II. Analysis of equine arteritis, rubella, bovine viral diarrhea, and hog cholera virus. Arch ges Virusforsch (33): 306–318, 1971

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Frost JW, Liess B, Prager D: Purification and electron microscopical observations of hog cholera virus. Comm Eur Commun (EUR 5904): 23–30, 1977

    Google Scholar 

  23. Rutili D, Titoli F: Ultrastructural studies of some organs from pigs with swine fever. Comm Eur Commun (EUR 5904): 41–51, 1977

    Google Scholar 

  24. Scott AC, Chasey D, Harkness JW: A comparative ultrastructural study of the viruses of bovine virus diarrhoea, border disease and swine fever. Comm Eur Commun (EUR 5904): 31–39, 1977

    Google Scholar 

  25. Enzmann, PJ, Weiland F: Structural similarities of hog cholera virus with togaviruses. Arch Virol (57): 339–348, 1978

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Mayr A, Mahnel H: Zbl Bakt I Abt Orig (195): 157–166, 1964

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Horzinek M, Mussgay M, Maess J, Petzold K: Arch ges Virusforsch (21): 98–112, 1967

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Mayr A, Mahnel H: Weitere Untersuchungen über die Züchtung von Schweinepestvirus in Zellkulturen mit cytopathogenem Effekt. Zbl Bakt I Abt Orig (199): 399–407, 1966

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Horzinek M, Überschär, S: Charakterisierung eines Schweine-Adenovirus im Zusammenhang mit Untersuchungen über das Virus der europäischen Schweinepest. Arch ges Virusforsch (18): 406–421, 1966

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Horzinek M, Mussgay M, Maess J, Petzold K: Nachweis dreier Virusarten (Schweinepest-, Adeno-, Picorna-Virus) in einem als cytopathogen bezeichneten Schweinepest-Virusstamm. Arch ges Virusforsch (21): 98–112, 1967

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Witter R, Frank H, Moennig V, Hunsmann G, Lange J, Schäfer W: Properties of mouse leukemia viruses. IV. Hemagglutination assay and characterization of hemagglutinating surface components. Virology (54): 330–345, 1973

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Moennig V, Frank H, Hunsmann G, Schneider I, Schäfer W: Properties of mouse leukemia viruses. VII. The major viral glycoprotein of Friend leukemia virus. Isolation and physicochemica1 properties. Virology (61): 100–111, 1974

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Pirtle EC: A soluble precipitating antigen from hog cholera virus propagated in tissue culture. I. Preparation and characterization of the antigen. Canad J Comp Med Vet Sci (28): 193–196, 1964

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Hafez SM, Petzoldt K, Reczko E: Morphology of bovine viral diarrhoea virus. Acta Virol (12): 471–473, 1968

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Laude H: Improved method for the purification of hog cholera virus grown in tissue culture. Arch Virol (54): 41–51, 1977

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Loan RW: Studies on the nucleic acid type and essential lipid content of hog cholera virus. Am J Vet Res (25): 1366–1370, 1964

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Zeegers JJW, Horzinek MC: Some properties of bovine viral diarrhoea virus and hog cholera virus. Comm Eur Commun (EUR 5904): 52–57, 1977

    Google Scholar 

  38. Diderholm H, Dinter Z: Infectious RNA derived from bovine virus diarrhea. Zbl Bakt Abt I Orig (201): 270–272, 1966

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Enzmann PJ, Rehberg H: The structural components of hog cholera virus. Z Naturforsch (32c): 456–458, 1977

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Moennig V: Untersuchungen über das Sedimentationsverhalten der Ribonukleinsäure des Virus der Mucosal Disease-Virusdiarrhoe: Ein Beitrag zu seiner Klassifizierung als Mitglied der Togavirusgruppe. Thesis, Hannover Vet School, 1971

    Google Scholar 

  41. van der Zeijst BAM, Horzinek MC, Moennig V: The genome of equine arteritis virus. Virology (68): 418–425, 1975

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Renard A, Brown-Shimmer S, Schmetz D, Guiot C, Dagenais L, Pastoret PP, Dina D, Martial J: Molecular cloning, sequencing and expression of BVDV RNA. Comm Eur Commun, submitted for publication, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  43. McKissick GE, Gustafson DP: In vivo demonstration of lability of hog cholera virus to lipolytic agents. Am J Vet Res (28): 909–914, 1967

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Clarke DH, Casals J: Techniques for hemagglutination and hemagglutination-inhibition with arthropod-borne viruses. Am J Trop Med Hyg (7): 561–573, 1958

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Hermodsson S, Dinter Z: Properties of bovine virus diarrhoea virus. Nature (194): 893–984, 1962

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Horzinek M: Characterization of hog cholera virus. I. Determination of buoyant density. J Bact (92): 1723–1726, 1966

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Cunliffe HR, Rebers PA: The purification and concentration of hog cholera virus. Can J Comp Med (32): 486–492, 1968

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Jacotot H: Sur la transmissibilité de la peste porcine à diverses espèces animales. Ann Inst Pasteur (62): 516–533, 1939

    Google Scholar 

  49. Zichis J: Studies on hog cholera virus. J Am Vet Med Ass (95): 272–277, 1939

    Google Scholar 

  50. Hashigushi W, Hika, U: Immunological studies on hog cholera virus. III. Read before the 10th session of the Japanese Society of Veterinary Science. Jap J Vet Sci (4): 304, 1942

    Google Scholar 

  51. Kuroda S, Matsuzawa H: Immunological studies on hog cholera virus. III. Read before the 10th session of the Japanese Society of Veterinary Science. NIBS Bull Biol Res (2): 23–27, 1957)

    Google Scholar 

  52. Kuroda S, Matsuzawa H: Serial passages of hog cholera virus in goats. NIBS Bull Biol Res (2): 23–27, 1957

    Google Scholar 

  53. Loan RW, Storm MM: Propagation and transmission of hog cholera virus in non-porcine hosts. Am J Vet Res (29): 807–811, 1968

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Nakamura J, Wagatuma S, Fukushu K: On the experimental infection with rinderpest virus in the rabbit. I. Some fundamental experiments. J Jap Soc Vet Sci (17): 185–204, 1938

    Google Scholar 

  55. Nakamura J, Wagatuma S, Fukushu K: On the experimental infection with rinderpest virus in the rabbit. I. Some fundamental experiments. J Jap Soc Vet Sci (9), 536, 1939

    Google Scholar 

  56. Armstrong C: Publ Health Rep (54): 2302, 1939

    Google Scholar 

  57. Koprowski H, James TR, Cox HR: Proc Soc Exptl Biol Med (63): 178–183, 1946

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Sabin AB, Schlesinger RW: Production of immunity to dengue with virus modified by propagation in mice. Science (101): 640–642, 1945

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Baker JA: Serial passage of hog cholera virus in rabbits. Proc Soc Exptl Biol Med (63): 183–187, 1946

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Koprowski H, James TR, Cox HR: Propagation of hog cholera virus in rabbits. Proc Soc Exptl Biol Med (63): 178–183, 1946

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Anonymus: Studies on the avirulent lapinized hog cholera virus. The susceptibility of rabbits to the lapinized hog cholera virus. Collected Papers of Veterinary Research, The Control Institute of Veterinary Bioproducts and Pharmaceuticals, Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry. Beijing, China (4): 62–63, 1978

    Google Scholar 

  62. Dunne HW: Hog cholera (European swine fever). Adv Vet Sci Comp Med (17): 315–359, 1973

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Aynaud JM, Asso J: La souche lapinisée dite ‘chinoise’ du virus de la peste porcine classique. Rec Med Vet (146): 119–139, 1970

    Google Scholar 

  64. Swangard W, Armbruster M, Carmenes P: Viruman, a vaccine against swine fever (hog cholera) on the basis of cell culture from tissues of ruminants. Vet med Nachr, Bayer Leverkusen (4): 255–271, 1969

    Google Scholar 

  65. Swangard W, Armbruster M, Carmenes P: Viruman, a vaccine against swine fever (hog cholera) on the basis of cell culture from tissues of ruminants. Vet med Nachr, Bayer Leverkusen (40): 636, 1970

    Google Scholar 

  66. Overby E, Eskildsen M: Transplacental infection in susceptible gilts after inoculations with: I. Lapinized swine fever vaccine. II. Bovine viral diarrhoea virus strains. Comm Eur Commun (EUR 5904): 420–429, 1977

    Google Scholar 

  67. Hecke F: Die künstliche Vermehrung des Schweinepestvirus mittels Gewebekulturen. Zbl Bakt Abt I Orig (126): 517–526, 1932

    Google Scholar 

  68. Frenkel S, van Bekkum JG, Frenkel HS: On the cultivation of hog cholera virus in swine spleen tissue explanted in a fluid medium. Bull Off Internat Epizoot (43): 327–330, 1955

    Google Scholar 

  69. Dale CN, Songer BA: In vitro propagation of hog cholera virus. I. Method of cultivation and observation on color changes in the medium. Am J Vet Res (18): 362–368, 1957

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Boynton WH: Preliminary report on the propagation of hog cholera virus in vitro. Vet Med (41): 346–347, 1946

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Dunne HW, Luedke AJ, Reich CV, Hokanson JF: The in vitro growth of hog cholera virus in cells of peripheral blood. Am J Vet Res (18): 502–507, 1957

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Loan RW, Gustafson DP: Cultivation of hog cholera virus in subculturable swine buffy coat cells. Am J Vet Res (22): 741–745, 1961

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Korn G, Zoeth B: Über die Vermehrung des Schweinepestvirus in einem Stamm von Lymphozyten-Phytozellen und einem Monozytenzellstamm. Zbl Bakt Hyg I Abt Orig A (218): 407–416, 1971

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Kresse JI, Stewart WC, Carbrey EA, Snyder ML: Sensitivity of swine buffy coat culture to infection with hog cholera virus. Am J Vet Res (37): 1315–1318, 1976

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. TenBroeck C: Cultivation of the hog cholera virus. J Exp Med (74): 427–432, 1941

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Markovits P, Biro J: Propagation of swine fever virus in tissue culture. Magy Allator Lapja (10). 38–43, 1955

    Google Scholar 

  77. Markovits P, Biro J: Propagation of swine fever virus in tissue culture. Magy Allator Lapja (25): 413, 1955)

    Google Scholar 

  78. Gustafson DP, Pomerat CM: Cytopathogenic changes of hog cholera virus on embryonic swine tissues in vitro. Am J Vet Res (18): 473–480

    Google Scholar 

  79. Karasszon D, Bodon L: Demonstration of the swine-fever virus in tissue culture by immunofluorescence. Acta Microbiol Acad Sci Hung (10): 287–291, 1963

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. Sato U, Nishimura Y, Hanaki T, Nobuto K: Attenuation of hog cholera by means of continuous cell-virus propagation (CCVP) method. Arch ges Virusforsch (14): 394–403, 1964

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. Pirtle EC, Kniazeff AJ: Susceptibility of cultured mammalian cells to infection with virulent and modified hog cholera viruses. Am J Vet Res (29): 1033–1040, 1968

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  82. Diderholm H, Dinter Z: The use of SV 40-transformed cells for titrations of bovine viral diarrhoea and hog cholera viruses. Zbl Vet Med B (12): 469–475, 1965

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. Sasahara J, Kumagai T, Shimizu Y, Furuuchi S: Field experiments of hog cholera live vaccine prepared in guinea-pig cell culture. Natl Inst Hlth Quart (Tokyo) (9): 83–91, 1969

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  84. Sasahara J, Kumagai T, Shimizu Y, Furuuchi S: Field experiments of hog cholera live vaccine prepared in guinea-pig cell culture. Natl Inst Hlth Quart (Tokyo) (40): 108, 1970

    Google Scholar 

  85. Dunne HW, Luedke AJ, Hokanson JF: The growth of animal leukocytes and their use in the cultivation of animal viruses. Am J Vet Res (19): 707–711, 1958

    Google Scholar 

  86. Bass EP, Ray JD: Evaluation of a tissue culture hog cholera vaccine. J Am Vet Med Ass (142): 1112–1117, 1963

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  87. Keeble SA, Done JT, Darbyshire JH: Studies on an attenuated swine fever vaccine. Brit Vet J (122): 190–195, 1966

    Google Scholar 

  88. Lang R, Leftheriotis E, Mackowiak C: Multiplication du virus lapinisé de la peste porcine sur cellules de rein de lapin et controle de son pouvoir immunigène. CR Acad Sci Paris (251): 1593–1594, 1960

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  89. Leftheriotis E, Precausta P, Caillere F: Etude d’une souche modifiée de virus de la peste porcine adaptée a la culture cellulaire de rein de mouton et son utilisation comme virus vaccin. Rev Med Vet (122): 33–44, 1971

    Google Scholar 

  90. De Castro MP: An infectious agent causing ‘spontaneous’ degeneration of swine cells in vitro. In Vitro (9): 8–16, 1973

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Bachmann PA, Sheffy BE, Siegl G: Viruses contributing to the cytopathic effect of hog cholera strain PAV-1. Arch ges Virusforsch (22): 467–471, 1967

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  92. Laude H: Virus de la peste porcine classique: Isolement d’une souche cytolytique à partir de cellules IB-RS2. Ann Microbiol (Inst Past) (129A): 553–561, 1978

    Google Scholar 

  93. van Bekkum JG, Barteling SJ: Plaque production by hog cholera virus. Arch ges Virusforsch (32): 185–200, 1970

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Gillespie JH, Sheffy BE, Baker JA: The propagation of hog cholera virus in tissue culture. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med (105): 679–681, 1960

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  95. Bodon, L: Occurrence of contaminant viruses in various hog cholera virus strains. I. Adenoviruses. Acta Vet Hung (16): 321–327, 1966

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  96. Bodon L: Occurrence of contaminating viruses in various swine fever virus strains. Acta Vet Acad Sci Hung (25): 291–296, 1975

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  97. Croghan DL, Matchett A, Koski TA: Isolation of porcine parvovirus from commercial trypsin. Appl Microbiol (26): 431–433, 1973

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  98. Breese SS jr.: Virus-like particles occurring in cultures of stable pig kidney cell cultures. Arch ges Virusforsch (30): 401–404, 1970

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Strandström H, Veijalainen P, Moennig V, Hunsmann G, Schwarz H, Schäfer W: C-type particles produced by a permanent cell line from a leukemic pig. I. Origin and properties of the host cells and some evidence for the occurrence of C-type-like particles. Virology (57): 175–178, 1974

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Moennig V, Frank H, Hunsmann G, Ohms H, Schwarz H, Schäfer W, Strandström H: C-type particles produced by a permanent cell line from a leukemic pig. II. Physical, chemical, and serological characterization of the particles. Virology (57): 179–183, 1974

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  101. Gratzek JB, Segre D, Berman DT: Detection and isolation of a virus contaminating a stock of virus diarrhea virus. Am J Vet Res (25): 374–379, 1964

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  102. Tamoglia TW: Laboratory evaluation of bovine respiratory disease vaccines for safety. J Am Vet Med Ass (152): 847–850, 1968

    Google Scholar 

  103. King AA, Harkness JW: Viral contamination of foetal bovine serum. Vet Rec (97): 16, 1975

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  104. Ward GM, Roberts SJ, McEntee K, Gillespie JH: A study of experimentally induced bovine viral diarrhea-mucosal disease in pregnant cows and their progeny. Cornell Vet (59): 525–538, 1969

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  105. Kniazeff AJ, Wopschall LJ, Hopps HE, Morris CS: Detection of bovine virus in fetal bovine serum used in cell culture. In Vitro (11): 400–403, 1975

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  106. Kresse JI, Stewart WC, Carbrey EA, Snyder, ML: End-point dilution-fluorescent antibody technique for cloning hog cholera virus. Am J Vet Res (43): 497–498, 1982

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  107. Dale CN, Schoening HW, Cole CG, Henley RR, Zinober MR: Variations (variants) of hog cholera virus. J Am Vet Med Ass (128): 279–285, 1951

    Google Scholar 

  108. Dale CN, Zinober MR: Variations (variants) of hog cholera virus. II. Perpetuation and attempts at enhancement of variant characteristics of hog cholera virus by means of serial passage with antiserum and without antiserum. J Am Vet Med Ass (125): 137–143, 1954

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  109. Lucas A, Bouley G, Paraf A, Quinchon C: Variation du virus de la peste porcine en France. Rec Med Vet (129): 18–23, 1953

    Google Scholar 

  110. Korondi A, Surjan J: Vergleichende Untersuchungen mit ausländischen Schweinepest-Virusstämmen. Acta Vet Acad Sci Hung (18): 187–192, 1968

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  111. Dorset M, McBryde CN, Niles WB: Further experiments concerning the production of immunity from hog cholera. USDA BAI BULL (102): 1908

    Google Scholar 

  112. Aynaud JM, Rigaud C, Le Turdu Y, Galicher C, Lombard J, Corthier C, Laude H: Peste porcine classique: Les variations sérologiques du virus en France et leur rôle dans l’évolution de la maladie sous la forme sub-clinique ou chronique sur le terrain. Ann Rech Vet (5): 57–85, 1974

    Google Scholar 

  113. Pirtle EC, Mengeling WL: Antigenic differences in two hog cholera virus strains. Am J Vet Res (32): 1473–1477, 1971

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  114. Launais M, Aynaud JM, Corthier, G: Peste porcine classique: Propriétés d’un clone (souche ‘Thiverval’) isolé en culture cellulaire à basse temperature. Application dans la vaccination. Rev Med Vet (123): 1537–1554, 1972

    Google Scholar 

  115. Mengeling WL, Packer RA: Pathogenesis of chronic hog cholera: Host response. Am J Vet Res (30): 409–417, 1969

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  116. Corthier G, Aynaud JM, Galicher C, Gelfi J: Activité antigenique comparée de deux togavirus: Le virus de la peste porcine et le virus de la maladie des muqueuses. Ann Rech Vet (5): 373–393, 1974

    Google Scholar 

  117. Kamijo Y, Ohkuma SI, Shimizu M, Shimizu Y: Differences in pathogenicity and antigenicity among hog cholera virus strains. Natl Inst Anim Hlth Quart (Tokyo) (17). 133–140, 1977

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  118. Shimizu M, Shimizu Y: Properties of hog cholera viruses recently isolated in Japan. Natl Inst Anim Hlth Quart (Tokyo) (23): 103–104, 1983

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  119. Neukirch M, Liess B, Frey HR, Prager D: Serologische Beziehungen zwischen Stämmen des Europäischen Schweinepest-Virus und dem Virus der Bovinen Virus-diarrhoe. Fortschr Vet Med (30): 148–153, 1980

    Google Scholar 

  120. Dunne HW, Smith EM, Runnells RA, Stafseth HS, Thorp F jr: A study of an encephalitic strain of hog cholera virus. Am J Vet Res (13): 277–289, 1952

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  121. Dale CN, Songer BA: In vitro propagation of hog cholera virus. III. Cultivation of an immunological variant, with retention of its identifying characteristics. Am J Vet Res (20): 311–318, 1959

    Google Scholar 

  122. Aynaud JM: Etude de la multiplication in vitro d’un clone du virus de la peste porcine. Ann Rech Vet (1): 25–36, 1968

    Google Scholar 

  123. Pittler H, Brack M, Schulz LCI, Rhode G, Witte K, Liess B: Untersuchungen über die Europäische Schweinepest. I. Mitteilung: Ermittlungen zur gegenwärtigen Seuchensituation in Norddeutschland. Dtsch Tierärztl Wschr (75): 537–542, 1968

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  124. Liess B, Schurian E: Inaktivierende Wirkung von TEGO 51/15 DL im Suspensionsversuch mit zwei Virusarten der Toga-Gruppe: der Europäischen Schweinepest und der Bovinen Virusdiarrhoe-Mucosal Disease. Arch Lebensmittelhyg (7): 154–157, 1973

    Google Scholar 

  125. Overby E: Immunization against swine fever with a Danish bovine viral diarrhoea strain, UG59. Nord Vet Med (25): 497–503, 1973

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  126. Moinar I: Precipitation reaction with swine fever material. Magy Allator Lapja (9): 146–148, 1954

    Google Scholar 

  127. Moinar I: Precipitation reaction with swine fever material. Magy Allator Lapja (26): 136, 1956)

    Google Scholar 

  128. Darbyshire JH: A serological relationship between swine fever and mucosal disease of cattle. Vet Rec (72): 331, 1960

    Google Scholar 

  129. Darbyshire JH: Agar gel diffusion studies with a mucosal disease of cattle. II. A serological relationship between a mucosal disease and swine fever. Res Vet Sci (3): 125–128, 1962

    Google Scholar 

  130. Horzinek MC: Non-arthropod-borne Togaviruses. Academic Press, London/New York/Toronto/Sydney/San Francisco, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  131. Gutekunst DE, Malmquist WA: Separation of a soluble antigen and infectious particles of bovine viral diarrhea viruses and their relationship to hog cholera virus. Canad J Comp Med Vet Sci (27): 121–123, 1963

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  132. van Aert A, Degraef R, Wellemans G: Purification and some properties of swine fever related mucosal disease precipitogen. Vlaams Diergeneesk Tijdschrift (44): 339–348, 1975

    Google Scholar 

  133. van Aert A: Precipiterend varkenspestantigeen zuiveringeigenschappen. Vlaams Diergeneesk Tijdschrift (39): 61–75, 1970

    Google Scholar 

  134. Pirtle EC, Gutekunst DE: Relationship between the soluble antigens of hog cholera and bovine viral diarrhoea viruses prepared in tissue culture. Vet Rec (76): 1177–1178, 1964

    Google Scholar 

  135. Matthaeus W, van Aert A: Die Beziehung zwischen den Immunpräzipitaten der europäischen Schweinepest und der Mucosal Disease des Rindes. Arch ges Virusforsch (34): 385–393, 1971

    Article  Google Scholar 

  136. Matthaeus W: Differences in reaction behaviour of structural polypeptides of bovine viral diarrhoea virus (BVDV) with antisera against BVDV and hog cholera virus (HCV). Zbl Vet Med B, (28): 126–132, 1981

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  137. Dalsgaard K, Overby E: Immunity against challenge with swine fever virus induced by a virus-specified glycopeptide isolated from infected cells. Comm Eur Commun (EUR 5904): 70–74, 1977

    Google Scholar 

  138. Mussgay M, Dietzschold B, Frenzel B, Kaaden OR, Straub OC, Weiland F: The bovine leukosis virus. Med Microbiol Immunol (164): 131–138, 1977

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  139. Neukirch M, Moennig V, Liess B: A simple procedure for the concentration and purification of hog cholera virus (HCV) using the lectin of ricinus communis. Arch Virol (69): 287–290, 1981

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  140. Mengeling WL, Gutekunst DE, Fernelius AL, Pirtle EC: Demonstration of an antigenic relationship between hog cholera and bovine viral diarrhea viruses by immunofluorescence. Canad J Comp Med Vet Sci (27): 162–164, 1963

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  141. Gutekunst DE, Malmquist WA: Complement-fixing and neutralizing antibody response to bovine viral diarrhea and hog cholera antigens. Canad J Comp Med Vet Sci (28): 19–23, 1964

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  142. Peters W, Greiser-Wilke I, Moennig V, Liess B: Preliminary serolgical characterization of bovine viral diarrhoea virus strains by monoclonal antibodies. Vet Microbiol: In press, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  143. Sheffy BE, Coggins L, Baker JA: Protection of pigs against hog cholera with virus diarrhea virus of cattle. Proc US Livestock San Ass (65): 347–353, 1961

    Google Scholar 

  144. Sheffy BE, Coggins L, Baker JA: Relationship between hog cholera virus and bovine viral diarrhea of cattle. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med (109): 349–352, 1962

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  145. Kumagai T, Morimoto T, Shimizu T, Sasahara J, Watanabe M: Antigenic relationship between hog cholera virus and bovine viral diarrhea virus as revealed by cross-neutralization. Nat Inst Anim Hlth Quart (Tokyo) (2): 201–206, 1962

    Google Scholar 

  146. Dinter Z, Hansen HJ, Roneus O: Untersuchungen über Mucosal Disease. I. Isolierung und Identifizierung des Virus der Virus Diarrhoe. Zbl Vet Med (9): 739–747, 1962

    Google Scholar 

  147. Coggins L, Seo S: Serological comparison with rabbit antisera of hog cholera virus and bovine virus diarrhea virus. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med (114): 778–780, 1963

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  148. Snowdon WA, French EL: The bovine mucosal disease-swine fever virus complex in pigs. Austral Vet J (44): 179–184, 1968

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  149. Liess B, Frey HR, Bucksch U, Roeder B, Frost J: Hog cholera virus antigens (Brief review) and some recent results on the relationship to envelope antigens of bovine viral diarrhea-mucosal disease virions. Comm Eur Commun (EUR 5451): 333–345, 1976

    Google Scholar 

  150. Atkinson GF, Baker JA, Campbell C, Coggins L, Nelson D, Robson D, Sheffy BE, Sippel W, Nelson S: Bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVD) vaccine for protection of pigs against hog cholera. Proc 66th Ann Meet US Livestock San Ass: 326–338, 1962

    Google Scholar 

  151. Baker JA, Coggins L, Robson D, Sheffy BE: Possibility of hog cholera eradication with BVD vaccine. Proc US Livestock San Ass (67): 366–370, 1963

    Google Scholar 

  152. Baker JA, Coggins L, Robson D, Sheffy BE, Volonec FJ: A possibility of decreasing the cost of hog cholera eradication with use of a heterotypic BVD vaccine. J Am Vet Med Ass (155): 1866–1873, 1969

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  153. Volonec FJ, Sheffy BE, Baker JA: Immunobiologic heterotypic activity associated with viral and soluble components of bovine virus diarrhea virus. Arch ges Virusforsch (36): 275–283, 1972

    Article  Google Scholar 

  154. Simonyi E, Biro J: Attempts to immunize pigs against swine fever using the Oregon C24V strain of bovine diarrhoea virus. Magy Allator Lapja (21): 312–313, 1966

    Google Scholar 

  155. Simonyi E, Biro J: Attempts to immunize pigs against swine fever using the Oregon C24V strain of bovine diarrhoea virus. Magy Allator Lapja (37): 232, 1967)

    Google Scholar 

  156. Tamoglia TW, Tellejohn AL, Phillips EE, Wilkinson FB: Further evaluation of hog cholera immunizing agents bovine virus diarrhea and hog cholera vaccines, MLV, TCO. Proc 69th Ann Meet US Livestock San Ass: 385–389, 1966

    Google Scholar 

  157. Zuffa A, Salaj J, and Zuffova J: Concerning the ability of bovine diarrhea virus to protect piglets against swine fever. Vet Cas (13): 169–177, 1970

    Google Scholar 

  158. Zuffa A, Salaj J, and Zuffova J: Concerning the ability of bovine diarrhea virus to protect piglets against swine fever. Vet Cas (41): 747, 1971

    Google Scholar 

  159. Stewart WC, Carbrey EA, Jenney EW, Brown CL, Kresse JI: Bovine viral diarrhea infection in pigs. J Am Vet Med Ass (159): 1556–1563, 1971

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  160. Dahle J, Liess B, Frey HR: Interspecies transmission of pestiviruses: Experimental infections with bovine viral diarrhea virus in pigs and hog cholera virus in cattle. Comm Eur Commun: In press, 1985

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. V. Moennig
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Virologie, Tierärztliche Hochschule Hannover, Bischofsholer Damm 15, 3000, Hannover 1, Federal Republic of Germany

    B. Liess

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1988 Martinus Nijhoff Publishing, Boston

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Moennig, V. (1988). Characteristics of the Virus. In: Liess, B. (eds) Classical Swine Fever and Related Viral Infections. Developments in Veterinary Virology, vol 5. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-2083-8_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-2083-8_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-9235-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-2083-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation