Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Nonconvex Optimization and Its Applications ((NOIA,volume 20))

Abstract

Optimal structural design problems concern with the choice of the design parameters (material variables, shapes etc) of a structure such as to make optimal certain response variables; this task is measured by an appropriate cost or gain function. They are mathematical programs with equilibrium constraints. The use of bilevel optimization techniques permit us to separate the optimal design problem and the structural analysis problem in two levels (subproblems) and, accordingly, allow for the use of existing methods and software for the solution of each one subproblem. In particular the utilisation of the powerful finite element analysis software is indispensable, since it permits the effective treatment of large scale problems.

Here the optimal structural design problem for nonsmooth mechanics’ structures is studied. All structures which involve non-differentiable potential energy functions and / or inequalities in their definition lead to nonsmooth mechanics problems. They are highly nonlinear problems which include, among others, frictionless and frictional unilateral contact effects, elastoplasticity etc. The structural analysis problem leads to nonsmooth potential energy minimization problems (or to substationarity problems in the case of nonconvex potentials). The nondifferentiability and the possible nonconvexity at the structural analysis level must be taken into account for the solution of the optimal design problem. In this chapter bilevel optimization algorithms for the solution of this problem will be investigated. Two model problems for which appropriate modelling techniques have been formulated and studied are presented here. They are solved by using previously published results and bilevel algorithms based on a coupling of nonsmooth optimization techniques with finite element modelling. The general problem is open for further research, a fact which is hoped to stimulate people working on multilevel and global optimization to contribute in this area.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aubin,J.-P. and Frankowska, H. (1990): “Set-valued analysis,” Birkhäuser Verlag, Boston.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Antes, H. and Panagiotopoulos, P.D. (1992): “An Integral Equation Approach to the Static and Dynamic Contact Problems. Equality and Inequality Methods,” Birkhäuser Verlag, Boston - Basel - Stuttgart.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Bendsoe, M.P., Olhoff, N. and Sokolowski, J. (1985): “Sensitivity analysis of problems of elasticity with unilateral constraints,” J. Struct. Mech. 13, pp. 201–222.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Clarke, F.H. (1983): “Optimization and nonsmooth analysis,” John Wiley & Sons, N.York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Cottle, R.W., Pang, J.S., Stone, R.E., (1992): “The linear complementarity problem,” Academic Press Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Demyanov, V.F., Stavroulakis, G.E., Polyakova, L.N. and Panagiotopoulos, P.D., (1996): “Quasidifferentiability and nonsmooth modelling in mechanics, engineering and economics,” Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Duvault, G. and Lions, J.L. (1972): “Les inéquations en méchanique et en physique,” Dunod, Paris (English translation: Springer Verlag, Wien - New York 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fiacco, A.V. (1976): “Sensitivity analysis for nonlinear programming using penalty methods,” Mathematical Programming 10, pp. 287–311.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Fichera, G. (1972): “Boundary value problems in elasticity with unilateral constraints,” in: Encyclopedia of Physics VIa/2, pp. 391–424, Springer Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Friesz, T.L., Tobin, R.L., Cho, H:-J. and Mehta, N.J. (1990): “Sensitivity analysis based heuristic algorithms for mathematical programs with variational inequality constraints,” Mathematical Programming 48, pp. 265–284.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Günzel, H., Stavroulakis, G.E. (1997): “A multilevel optimization problem arising in smart structures,” Intern. Conf. on Optimization and Optimal Control, SIGOPT, DMV, Pfalzakademie, Lambrecht, February 24–28 (to appear)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jongen, H. Th., Jonker, P., Twilt, F. (1983): “Nonlinear Optimization in Rn. Vol. I: Morse Theory, Chebyshev Approximation,” Methoden und Verfahren der mathematischen Physik Band 29, Peter Lang Verlag, Frankfurt am Main, Berlin New York.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jongen, H. Th., Jonker, P., Twilt, F. (1986): “Nonlinear Optimization in R n. Vol. II: Transversality, Flows, Parametric Aspects,” Methoden und Verfahren der mathematischen Physik Band 32, Peter Lang Verlag, Frankfurt am Main, Berlin New York.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Klarbring, K.C. (1986): “Quadratic programs in frictionless contact problems,” Int. J. of Engineering Sciences 24 (7), pp. 1207–1217.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Kleiber, M. and Kowalczyk, P. (1995): “Constitutive parameter sensitivity in elasto—plasticity,” Computational Mechanics 17, pp. 36–48.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Kyparisis, J. (1986): “Uniqueness and differentiability of solutions of parametric nonlinear complementarity problems,” Mathematical Programming 36, pp. 105–113.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Kyparisis, J. (1990): “Solution differentiability of variational inequalities,” Mathematical Programming 48, pp. 285–301.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Lemarechal, C., Strodiot, J.J. and Bihain, A. (1981): “On a bundle algorithm for nonsmooth optimization,” in: Nonlinear Programming 4, Eds. Mangasarian, O.L., Meyer, R.R. and Robinson, S.M., pp. 245–282, New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Outrata, J.V. (1993): “Necessary optimality conditions for Stackelberg problems,” J.O.T.A. 76 (2), pp. 205–320.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Outrata, J.V. (1992): “On optimal control of systems governed by variational inequalities,” DFG Report No. 351, Universität Bayreuth, F.R. Germany and SIAM J. Optimization, Vol.2, 1994 (to appear)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Outrata, J.V. and Zowe, J. (1992): “A nondifferentiable approach to the solution of control problems with variational inequalities,” DFG Report No. 368, Universität Bayreuth, F.R. Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Outrata, J. and Zowe, J. (1995): “A numerical approach to optimization problems with variational inequality constraints,” Mathematical Programming 68, pp. 105–130.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Panagiotopoulos, P.D. (1976): “Subdifferentials and optimal control in unilateral elasticity,” Mech. Res. Comm. 3, pp. 91–96.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Panagiotopoulos, P.D. (1983): “Optimal control and parameter identification of structures with convex and non-convex strain energy density. Applications to elastoplasticity and to contact problems,” SM Archives 8, pp. 160–183.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Panagiotopoulos, P.D. (1985): “Inequality problems in mechanics and applications. Convex and nonconvex energy functionals,” Birkhäuser Verlag, Boston - Basel - Stuttgart (Russian translation by MIR Publishers, Moscow 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Panagiotopoulos, P.D. (1991): “Optimal control of systems governed by variational-hemivariational inequalities,” International Series of Numerical Mathematics, Vol. 102, pp. 161–181, Birkhuser Verlag, Basel.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Panagiotopoulos, P.D. (1993): “Hemivariational inequalities. Applications to mechanics and engineering,” Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Schramm, H. (1989): “Eine Kombination von Bundle-und Trust—RegionVerfahren zur Lösung nichtdifferenzierbarer Optimierungsprobleme,” Bayreuther Math. Schriften 30.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Schramm, H. and Zowe, J. (1992): “A version of the bundle idea for minimizing a nonsmooth function: Conceptual idea, convergence analysis, numerical results,” SIAM J. Optimization 2, pp. 121–152.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Sokolowski, J., (1988): “Sensitivity analysis of contact problems with prescribed friction,” Applied Mathematics and Optimization 18, pp. 99–117.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Stavroulakis, G.E. (1990): “On the static behavior of cracked masonry walls,” European Journal of Mechanics, A/Solids 9 (4), pp. 341–358.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  32. Stavroulakis, G.E., (1995): “Optimal prestress of cracked unilateral structures: finite element analysis of an optimal control problem for variational inequalities,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 123, pp. 231–246.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Stavroulakis, G.E., (1995): “Optimal prestress of structures with frictional unilateral contact interfaces,” Archives of Applied Mechanics (for. Ing. Archiv) 66, p. 71–81.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stavroulakis, G.E., Günzel, H. (1998). Optimal Structural Design in Nonsmooth Mechanics. In: Migdalas, A., Pardalos, P.M., Värbrand, P. (eds) Multilevel Optimization: Algorithms and Applications. Nonconvex Optimization and Its Applications, vol 20. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0307-7_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0307-7_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-7989-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-0307-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics