Skip to main content

Blastocyst Development in Culture: The Role of Macromolecules

  • Conference paper
ART and the Human Blastocyst

Part of the book series: Proceedings in the Serono Symposia USA Series ((SERONOSYMP))

Abstract

Developmental plasticity—the ability of an embryo to retain viability in the face of environmental fluctuation and challenge—is the biological quality that has facilitated the success of clinical in vitro fertilization. Plasticity, however, can be foe as weil as friend because it is a major confounder in experimental efforts to define the nutritional requirements of preimplantation embryos. For example, the range in latitude we are afforded by plasticity in one embryo may not be the same that is available in a sibling embryo. Patient age, diagnosis, and ovarian stimulation protocol all impinge upon plasticity, so producing a cohort of embryos with developmental tolerances similar to another cohort is difficult at best. Optimization requires us to find the middle of the range of tolerances. This approaches impossibility without quantitative measures in vitro that relate directly to viability after transfer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Caro CM, Trounson A. Successful fertilization, embryo development, and pregnancy in human in vitro fertilization (IVF) using a chemically defined culture medium containing no protein. J In Vitro Fertil Embryo Transf 1986;3:215–17.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Pool TB, Atiee SH, Martin JE. Oocyte and embryo culture. Basic concepts and recent advances. In: May JV, ed. Assisted reproduction: laboratory considerations. Infert Reprod Med Clin N Am 1998;9:181–203.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Saito H, Marrs RP, Berger T, Brown J, Mishell DR, Jr. Enhancement of in vitro development by specific serum supplements. Fertil Steril (Abstr) 1983;39:423.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Leung PCS, Gronow MJ, Kellow GN, Lopata A, Speirs AL, McBain JC, et al. Serum supplement in human in vitro fertilization and embryo development. Fertil Steril 1984;41:36–39.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Edwards RG. Maturation in vitro of mouse, sheep, cow, pig, rhesus monkey and human ovarian oocytes. Nature 1965;208:349–51.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Edwards RG, Steptoe PC, Purdy JM. Establishing full-term human pregnancies using cleaving embryos grown in vitro. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1980;87:737–56.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gardner DK. Mammalian embryo culture in the absence of serum or somatic cell support. Cell Biol Int 1994;18:1163–79.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dorland M, Gardner DK, Trounson AO. Serum in synthetic oviduct fluid causes mitochondrial degeneration in ovine embryos. J Reprod Fertil Abstract Series 1994;13:70.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Walker SK, Heard TM, Seamark RF. In vitro culture of sheep embryos without co-culture: successes and perspectives. Theriogenology 1992;37:111–26.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Thompson JG, Gardner DK, Pugh PA, McMillan WH, Tervit HR. Lamb birth weight following transfer is affected by the culture system used for pre-elongation development of embryos. J Reprod Fertil Abstract Series 1994;13:69.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Edwards RG, Bavister BD, Steptoe PC. Early stages of fertilization in vitro of human oocytes matured in vitro. Nature 1969;221:632–35.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Menezo Y, Testart J, Perone D. Serum is not necessary in human in vitro fertilization and embryo development. Fertil Steril 1984;42:750–55.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ashwood-Smith MJ, Hollands P, Edwards RG. The use of Albuminar (TM) as a medium supplement in clinical IVF. Hum Reprod 1989;4:702–5.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Staessen C, Van den Abbeel E, Carle M, Khan I, Devroey P, Van Steirteghem AC. Comparison between human serum and Albuminar–20 (TM) supplement for in vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 1990;5:336–41.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pool TB, Martin JE. High continuing pregnancy rates after in vitro fetilization-embryo transfer using medium supplemented with a plasma protein fraction containing α and β-globulins. Fertil Steril 1994;61:714–19.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Weathersbee PS, Pool TB, Ord T. Synthetic serum substitute (SSS): a globulin-enriched protein supplement for human embryo culture. J Assist Reprod Genet 1995;12:354–60.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Adler A, McVicker-Reing A, Bedford MJ, et al. Plasmanate as a medium supplement for in vitro fertilization. J Assist Reprod Genet 1993;10:67–71.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bavister BD. Substitution of a synthetic polymer for protein in a mammalian gamete culture system. J Exp Zoo J 1981;217:45–51.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Schini SA, Bavister BD. Two-cell block to development of cultured hamster embryos is caused by phosphate and glucose. Biol Reprod 1988;39:1183–92.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Pinyopummintr T, Bavister BD. In vitro-matured/in vitro-fertilized bovine oocytes can develop into morulae/blastocysts in chemically defined, protein-free culture medium. Biol Reprod 1991;45:736–42.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gardner DK, Rodriegez-Martinez H, Lane M. Fetal development after transfer is increased by replacing protein with the glycosaminoglycan hyaluronan for mouse embryo culture and transfer. Hum Reprod 1999;14:2575–80.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Racowsky C, Jackson KV, Cekleniak NA, Fox JH, Hornstein MD. The number of eight-cell embryos is a key determinant for selecting day 3 or day 5 transfer. Fertil Steril 2000;73:558–64.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Oliphant G. Biochemistry and immunology of oviductal fluid. In: ScigIer AM, ed. The fallopian tube: basic studies and clinical contributions. New York: Futura Publishing Company, 1986:129–45.

    Google Scholar 

  24. DeSouza M, Lagow E, Carson D. Mucin function and expression in mammalian reproductive tract tissues. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1998;247:1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Jansen RPS. Ultrastructure and histochemistry of acid mucus glycoproteins in the estrous mammal oviduct. Microsc Res Tech 1995;32:29–49.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Aplin JD, Hey NA. MUC1, endometrium and embryo implantation. Biochem Soc Trans 1995;23:826–31.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Murray MK, Messinger SM. Early embryonic development in the Djungarian hamster (Phodopus sungorus) is accompanied by alterations in the distribution and intensity of an estrogen (E2)-dependent oviduct glycoprotein in the blastomere membrane and zona pellucida and in its association with f-actin. Biol Reprod 1994;1126–39.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hunter RHF. Modulation of gamete and embryonic microenvironments by oviduct glycoproteins. Mol Reprod Dev 1994;39:176–81.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Verhage HG, Fazleabas AT, Donnelly K. The in vitro synthesis and release of proteins by the human oviduct. Endocrinology 1988;122:1639–45.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Lagow E, DeSouza M, Carson DD. Mammalian reproductive tract mucins. Hum Reprod Update 1999;5:280–92.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Gipson I, Ho SB, Spurr-Michaud SJ, Tisdale AS, Zhan Q, Torlakovic E, et al. Mucin genes expressed by human female reproductive tract epithelia. Biol Reprod 1997;56:999–1011.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Harding SE. The macrostructure of mucus glycoproteins in solution. Adv Carbohydr Chem Biochem 1989;47:345–81.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Allen A. Structure of gastrointestinal mucus glycoproteins and the viscous and gel-forming properties of mucus. Br Med Bull 1978;34:28–33.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Tarn PY, Verdugo P. Control of mucus hydration as a Donnan equilibrium process. Nature 1981;292:340–42.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Gardner DK, SchooIcraft WB, Wagley L, Schlenker T, Stevens J, Hesla J. A prospective randomized trial of blastocyst culture and transfer in in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 1998;13:3434–40.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Behr B, Pool TB, Milki AA, Moore D, Gebhardt J, Dasig D. Preliminary c1inical experience with human blastocyst development in vitro without co-culture. Hum Reprod 1999;14:454–57.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Hili JL, Wade MG, Nancarrow CD, Kelleher DL, Boland MP. Influence of ovine oviducal amino acid concentrations and an ovine oestrus-associated glycoprotein on development and viability of bovine embryos. Mol Reprod Dev 1997;47:164–69.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Vansteenbrugge A, Van Langendonckt A, Massip A, Dessy F. Effect of estrus-associated glycoprotein and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase–1 secreted by oviduct cells on in vitro bovine embryo development. Mol Reprod Dev 1997;46:527–34.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this paper

Cite this paper

Pool, T.B. (2001). Blastocyst Development in Culture: The Role of Macromolecules. In: Gardner, D.K., Lane, M. (eds) ART and the Human Blastocyst. Proceedings in the Serono Symposia USA Series. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0149-3_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0149-3_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-6540-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-0149-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics