Skip to main content

Abstract

In Chapters 8 and 10, we discussed five of the best measures of the degree of relationship existing between two variables. All five are excellent measures of the degree of association between the two variables. We employed them, not primarily to find out whether there was or was not any (nonchance) relationship between the variables, but rather to measure the amount, degree, or extent of such relationship. For such a purpose, they are eminently proper procedures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Lewis, D. and Burke, C. J. The use and misuse of the chi-square test. Psychological Bulletin, 1949, 46, 433–489. See also replies by three statisticians and further discussion by Lewis and Burke in the same journal, 1950, 47, 331–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, Frances F. Preferences for male and female counselors. Personnel and Guidance Journal, 1964, 42, 463–467.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teesdale, C. Ecological observations on the molluscs of significance in the transmission of bilharziasis in Kenya. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 1962, 27, 759–782.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sigurjönsson, J., et al. Experience with influenza vaccination in Iceland, 1957. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 1959, 20, 401–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • This method of getting successive probabilities from the preceding ones is not well known, although it was given in Freeman, G. H., and Halton, J. H. Note on an exact treatment of contingency, goodness of fit and other problems of significance. Biometrika, 1951, 38, 141–149.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • See page 59 of Merle W. Tate and Richard C. Clelland. Nonparametric and Shortcut Statistics. Danville, Ill.: Interstate Printers and Publishers, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1979 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kurtz, A.K., Mayo, S.T. (1979). Chi Square. In: Statistical Methods in Education and Psychology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-6129-2_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-6129-2_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-6131-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-6129-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics