Skip to main content

Clinical Study of Spinal Cord Evoked Potentials

  • Conference paper
Neurophysiology and Standards of Spinal Cord Monitoring

Summary

The author’s experience with ascending SEPs during 36 cases of spinal surgery is reported. Qualified SEP was obtained in 10 of 12 who underwent anterior spinal surgery and in 19 of 24 with posterior spine surgery. In anterior spinal surgery, 4 cases (40%) showed amplitude attenuations more than 30% of baseline amplitude, and in posterior spinal surgery, more than 30% amplitude attenuation was seen in 5 cases (26%) with laminoplasty. There were two cases which showed more than 50% amplitude attenuation; however, postoperative results were not catastrophic (54).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baba, H.; Shima, I.; Tomita, K. et al.: Clinical usefulness of spinal cord evoked potentials. J. Schramm; S.J. Jones (eds), Spinal Cord Monitoring. Berlin Heidelber: Springer-Verlag, 1985, pp. 245–249.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bunch, W.H.; Scarff, T.B.; Besser, M. et al.: Spinal cord monitoring. J. Bone Joint Surg. (Am.), 65: 707–710, 1983.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Dinner, D.S; Luders, H.; Lesser, R.P. et al.: Intraoperative spinal somatosensory evoked potential monitoring. J. Neurosurg., 65: 807–814, 1986.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hahn, J.F.; Lesser, R.; Klem, G. et al.: Simple technique for monitoring intraoperative spinal cord function. Neurosurg., 9: 692–695, 1981.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Levy, W.J.; York, D.H.; McCaffrey, M. et al.: Motor evoked potentials from transcranial stimulation of the motor cortex in humans. Neurosurg., 15: 287–302, 1984.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Macon, J.B.; Poletti, C.E.; Sweet, W.H. et al.: Conducted somatosensory evoked potentials during spinal surgery. Part 2: Clinical applications. J. Neurosurg., 57: 354–359, 1982.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Whittle, I.R.; Johnston, I.H.; Besser, M. et al.: Recording of somatosensory evoked potentials for in traoperative spinal cord monitoring. J. Neurosurg., 64: 601–612, 1986.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1988 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Baba, H. et al. (1988). Clinical Study of Spinal Cord Evoked Potentials. In: Ducker, T.B., Brown, R.H. (eds) Neurophysiology and Standards of Spinal Cord Monitoring. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3804-1_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3804-1_26

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-8359-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-3804-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics