Skip to main content

Reproductive Technology and Disability

  • Chapter
Reproductive Laws for the 1990s

Part of the book series: Contemporary Issues in Biomedicine, Ethics, and Society ((CIBES))

Abstract

How do the new reproductive technologies affect people with disabilities? Answering this question, taking into account current and future generations of disabled women, men, and children requires putting a biological fact, impairment or disability, in a social context. In a different society than ours, the meaning of the new technologies for people with disabilities could resemble that for people without disabilities. In other words, any special implications for people with disabilities stem primarily, though not exclusively, from their position as the subjects of deep-rooted ambivalence on the part of the nondisabled population. Below, I will sketch out the social context for disability in our society and then discuss from the perspective of disability rights the six areas of reproductive concerns featured in other segments of this book: prenatal screening, time limits on abortion, fetus as patient, reproductive hazards in the workplace, alternative modes of reproduction, and interference with reproductive choice.

This essay reflects the views of the author and not those of the New Jersey Commission on Legal and Ethical Problems in the Delivery of Health Care. A number of people helped to refine this essay. Among the participants in the Project on Reproductive Laws for the 1990s, I owe special debts to Sherrill Cohen, Irene Crowe, Mary Sue Henifin, Judy Norsigian, Rosalind Petchesky, and Nadine Taub. For their close reading and important suggestions, I would also like to thank: Ellen Baker, Douglas Biklen, Michelle Fine, Anne Finger, Alan Gartner, Judy Heumann, Mary Johnson, Bob Kraft, Betty Levin, Vivian Lindermayer, Abby Lippman, Marsha Saxton, Richard Scotch, William Weil, and Irving Kenneth Zola. I must say a special thank you to Ellen Baker and Alan Gartner, who took time to think through the topics as I struggled with them, and whose intellectual integrity and steadfast friendship have sustained me in this endeavor and much else besides.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrews, L. B. (1985). New Conceptions: A Consumer’s Guide to the Newest Infertility Treatments Including In Vitro Fertilization, Artificial Insemination, and Surrogate Motherhood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Annas, G. J. and Elias, S. (1983). In Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer: Medico-Legal Aspects of New Techniques to Create a Family. Family Law Quarterly, 17 (2) Summer, 199–223.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Applebaum, E. and Firestein, S. K. (1983). A Genetic Counseling Casebook.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arditti, R., Klein, R. D., and Minden, S. (Eds.), (1984). Test-Tube Women: What Future for Motherhood?

    Google Scholar 

  • Asch, A. (1986). Will Populism Empower Disabled People? in H. C. Boyte and F. Reissman, (Eds.), The New Populism: The Politics of Empowerment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asch, A. and Fine, M. (1988). Introduction: Beyond Pedestals, in M. Fine and A. Asch, (Eds.), Women with Disabilities: Essays in Psychology, Culture, and Politics, 1–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asch, A. and Sacks, L. (1983). Lives Without, Lives Within: The Autobiographies of Blind Women and Men. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, 77 (6), 242–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayles, M. D. (1984). Reproductive Ethics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, J. (1974). The Future of Motherhood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blakeslee, S. (1986, October 7). Fetus Returned to Womb Following Surgery. New York Times, pp. C1 and C3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonwich, E. (1985). Sex Role Attitudes and Role Reorganization in Spinal Cord Injured Women, in M. J. Deegan and N. A. Brooks, (Eds.), Women and Disability: The Double Handicap, 56–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boston Women’s Health Book Collective. (1984). The New Our Bodies, Ourselves.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowe, F. (1980). Rehabilitating America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowe, F. (1984). Disabled Women in America. Washington, D.C.: President’s Committee on Employment of the Handicapped.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braille Monitor. (1986, August-September). Legalized Kidnapping: State Takes Child Away from Blind Mother, 432–435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brightman, A. J. (1984). Ordinary Moments: The Disabled Experience.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne, S., Connors, D., and Stern, N. (Eds.), (1985). With the Power of Each Breath.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. A. (1979). Taking Care of Strangers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L. G. (1986). Selective Abortion and the Diagnosis of Fetal Damage: Issues and Concerns. Journal of the Association of Persons with Severe Handicaps, 1 (3), 188–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, G. (1983, October 12). The Success Story of a Disabled Mother. New York Times, pp. C1 and C2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, G. (1986, December 15). Children of Deaf Share Their Lives. New York Times.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dally, A. (1983). Inventing Motherhood: The Consequences of an Ideal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darling, R. B. (1979). Families Against Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeJong, G. and Lifchez, R. (1983). Physical Disability and Public Policy. Scientific American, 48, 240–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeLoach, C. and Greer, B. G. (1981). Adjustment to Severe Physical Disability: A Metamorphosis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowrick, S. and Grundberg, S. (Eds.), (1980). Why Children.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, A. and Dworkin, R. (Eds.), (1976). The Minority Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elias, S. and Annas, G. J. (Eds.), (1987). Reproductive Genetics and the Law.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, D. (1983). The Lives of Mentally Retarded People.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, M. and Asch, A. (1985). Disabled Women: Sexism Without the Pedestal, in M. J. Deegan and N. A. Brooks, (Eds.), Women and Disability: The Double Handicap, 3–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, M. and Asch, A. (1988). Disability Beyond Stigma: Social Interaction, Discrimination, and Activism. Journal of Social Issues, 44 (1), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, J. (1984). Healing before Birth: An Ethical Dilemma. Technology Review, 87 (1), 27–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedland, R. and Kort, C. (Eds.), (1981). The Mothers’ Book.

    Google Scholar 

  • Funk, R. (1987). Disability Rights: From Caste to Class in the Context of Civil Rights, in A. Gartner and T. Joe, (Eds.), Images of the Disabled, Disabling Images, 7–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gliedman, J. and Roth, W. (1980). The Unexpected Minority: Handicapped Children in America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gold, S. (1985, November). A Year of Accomplishment: Sharon Gold Reports to the Blind of California. Braille Monitor, 629–640.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groce, N. E. (1985). Everyone Here Spoke Sign Language: Hereditary Deafness on Martha’s Vineyard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haber, L. and McNeil, J. (1983). Methodological Questions in the Estimation of Disability Prevalence. (Available from Population Division, U.S. Census Bureau.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, H. (1983a, March-April). Paternalism and Public Policy. Society, 36–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, H. (1983b, December). “The Good Parts”: Interpersonal Relationships in the Autobiographies of Physically Disabled Persons. Wenner-Gren Foundation Working Papers in Anthropology, 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, H. (1987). Civil Rights for Disabled Americans: The Foundation of a Political Agenda, in A. Gartner and T. Joe, (Eds.), Images of the Disabled, Disabling Images, 181–204. Harper’s Magazine. (1987, September).

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, Louis and Associates. (1986). The ICD Survey of Disabled Americans: Bringing Disabled Americans into the Mainstream. New York: International Center for the Disabled.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, L. W. and Hoffman, M. L. (1973). The Value of Children to Parents, in J. T. Fawcett, (Ed.), Psychological Perspectives on Population.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyler, D. (1985). To Choose a Child, in S. Browne, D. Connors, and N. Stern, (Eds.), With the Power of Each Breath, 280–283. Insight. (1986, November 24). Deaf Pride.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamanna, M. A. (1984). Social Science and Ethical Issues: The Policy Implications of Poll Data on Abortion, in S. Callahan and D. Callahan, (Eds.), Abortion: Understanding Differences, 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeMaistre, J. (1985). Parenting, in S. Browne, D. Connors, and N. Stern, With the Power of Each Breath, 284–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macklin, R. and Gaylin, W. (Eds.), (1981). Mental Retardation and Sterilization.

    Google Scholar 

  • March of Dimes. (1985, November). Birth Defects: Tragedy and Hope.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, G. F. (1983). Voices from the Shadows: Women with Disabilities Speak Out.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Association for Sickle Cell Disease. (No date). Position Paper on Prenatal Diagnosis of Sickle Cell Anemia.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Council on the Handicapped. (1986). Toward Independence: An Assessment of Federal Laws and Programs Affecting Persons with Disabilities—with Legislative Recommendations. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office stock number 052-003-01022-2.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Public Radio. (1987, December 29). Morning Edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Public Radio. (1988, January 16). Weekend Edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ontario Law Reform Commission. (1985). Report on Human Artificial Reproduction and Related Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlansky, M. D. and Heward, W. L. (1981). Voices: Interviews with Handicapped People.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollitt, K. (1987, May 23). The Strange Case of Baby M. The Nation, 681–688.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapp, R. (1988). Moral Pioneers: Women, Men, and Fetuses on the Frontier of Reproductive Technology, in E. H. Baruch, A. D’Adamo, Jr., and J. Seager, (Eds.), Embryos, Ethics, and Women’s Rights.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Pub. L. No. 93–112, 87 Stat. 355 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W. (1981). The Handicapped Speak.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothman, B. K. (1986). The Tentative Pregnancy: Prenatal Diagnosis and the Future of Motherhood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothman, D. and Rothman, S. (1984). The Willowbrook Wars: A Decade of Struggle for Social Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Safilios-Rothschild, C. (1970). The Sociology and Social Psychology of Disability and Rehabilitation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawisch, L. P. (1978). Expressed Willingness to Parent Handicapped Children (unpublished doctoral dissertation submitted to Department of Psychology, Michigan State University).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulz, R. and Decker, S. (1985). Long-term Adjustment to Physical Disability: The Role of Social Support, Perceived Control, and Self-Blame. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48 (5), 1162–1172.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scotch, R. K. (1984). From Good Will to Civil Rights: Transforming Federal Disability Policy, 159–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scotch, R. K. (1988). Disability as the Basis for a Social Movement. Journal of Social Issues, 44 (1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaul, S., Dowling, P., and Laden, B. F. (1985). Like Other Women: Perspectives of Mothers with Physical Disabilities, in M. J. Deegan and N. A. Brooks, (Eds.), Women and Disability: The Double Handicap, 133–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siller, J., Ferguson, L., Vann, D. H., and Holland, B. (1976). Structure of Attitudes toward the Physically Disabled. New York: New York University School of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanworth, M. (1988). Reproductive Technologies and the Deconstruction of Motherhood, in M. Stanworth, (Ed.), Reproductive Technologies: Gender, Motherhood, and Medicine, 10–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinbock, B. (1986). The Logical Case for “Wrongful Life”. Hastings Center Report, 16 (2), 15–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stroman, D. F. (1982). The Awakening Minorities: The Physically Handicapped.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorne, B. with Yalom, M. (1982). Rethinking the Family: Some Feminist Questions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurman, S. K. (Ed.), (1985). Children of Handicapped Parents.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turnbull, H. R. and Turnbull, A. (Eds.), (1985). Parents Speak Out: Then and Now.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Census Bureau. (1983). Labor Force Status and Other Characteristics of Persons with a Work Disability: 1982. Current Population Reports, Series P-23, No. 127.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Commission on Civil Rights. (1983). Accommodating the Spectrum of Individual Abilities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, L. A. (1985, June 20). Children of the Disabled Face Special Pressures. New York Times, pp. C1 and C6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Washington Post. (1988, January 18). Second Child to Be Taken from Disabled Mom. p. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, B. (1983). Physical Disability: A Psycho-Social Approach.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zelizer, V. A. (1985). Pricing the Priceless Child: The Changing Social Value of Children.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zetlin, A. G., Weisner, T. S., and Gallimore, R. (1985). Diversity, Shared Functioning, and the Role of Benefactors: A Study of Parenting by Retarded Persons, in S. K. Thurman, (Ed.), Children of Handicapped Parents.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zola, I. K. (1983). Individual Choice and Health Policy: A Sociopolitical Scenario for the 1980’s, in I. K. Zola, (Ed.), Socio-Medical Inquiries, 285–298.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1989 Rutgers, The State University

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Asch, A. (1989). Reproductive Technology and Disability. In: Cohen, S., Taub, N. (eds) Reproductive Laws for the 1990s. Contemporary Issues in Biomedicine, Ethics, and Society. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3710-5_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3710-5_4

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-89603-175-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-3710-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics