Skip to main content

Tools for Expert Designers: Supporting Conceptual Design

  • Conference paper
Design Theory ’88

Abstract

This paper reviews a few examples of information available from psychology that are pertinent to CAD tools used by expert, creative designers. Well-documented evidence on expertise is used to formulate a set of recommendations that will promote conceptual design when used in a CAD system. The advantages of borrowing information from established disciplines such as psychology to facilitate theory in new domains such as design are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adelson, B. (1981). Problem solving and the development of abstract categories in programming languages. Memory & Cognition, 9(4), 422–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adelson, B. (1984). When novices surpass experts: The difficulty of a task may increase with expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10(3), 483–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J.R. (1985). Cognitive Psychology and Its Implications. New York: W.H. Freeman and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chase, W.C. & Simon, H.A. (1977). Problem solving in semantically rich domains. Cognitive Science, 1, 193–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Groot, A.D. (1965). Thought and Choice in Chess. Paris: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egan, D.E. & Schwartz, B.J. (1979). Chunking in recall of symbolic drawings. Memory & Cognition, 7, 149–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang, R.C. & Ullman, D.G. (1988). Free-hand: A sketching recognition system for conceptual mechanical design. Design Process Research Group Tech. Report #DPRG-88–5, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Or.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lansdown, J. (1987). The creative aspects of CAD: A possible research. Design Studies, 8(2), 76–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamberti, D.M. & Newsome, S.L. (in press). Presenting abstract versus concrete information in expert systems: What is the impact on user performance? International Journal of Man-Machine Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKeithen, K., Reitman, J.S., Reuter, H., & Hirtle, S.C. (1981). Knowledge organization and skill differences in computer programmers. Cognitive Psychology, 13, 307–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mikaelian, D.M. (1988). The effects of programming expertise on the organization of task-relevant information. Unpublished masters thesis, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newsome, S.L., Spillers, W.R. & Vosburgh, A.M. (1987). Quantitative evaluations of human factors savings in CAD workstations. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Civil and Structural Engineering Computing, Civil — Comp 87, 1, 105–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reitman, J.S. (1976). Skilled perception in GO: Deducing memory structures from inter-response times. Cognitive Psychology, 8, 336–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shneiderman, B. (1976). Exploratory experiments in programmer behavior.International Journal of Computer and Information Services,. 5, 123–143.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Simes, D.K. & Sirsky, P.A. (1985). Human factors: An exploration of the psychology of human-computer dialogues. In Hartson, R.H. (Ed.) Advances in Human-Computer Interaction, Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 49–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spillers, W.R. & Newsome, S.L. (in press). Design theory: A model for conceptual design. In this volume.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ullman, D.G., Dietterich, T.G., & Stauffer, L.A. (1988). A model of the mechanical design process based on empirical data. Design Process Research Group Tech. Report #DPRG-88–1, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Or.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldron, M.B., Waldon, K.J. & Owen, D.H. (1988). Use of systemic theory to represent the conceptual mechanical design process. Preprints of Design Theory ’88, Troy, NY: RPI.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1989 Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Newsome, S.L., Spillers, W.R. (1989). Tools for Expert Designers: Supporting Conceptual Design. In: Newsome, S.L., Spillers, W.R., Finger, S. (eds) Design Theory ’88. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3646-7_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3646-7_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-8189-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-3646-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics