Skip to main content

A Representation for Qualitative 3-D Object Recognition Integrating Object-Centered and Viewer-Centered Models

  • Chapter
Science of Vision

Abstract

In the context of computer vision, the recognition of three-dimensional objects typically consists of image capture, feature extraction, and object model matching. During the image capture phase, a camera senses the brightness at regularly spaced points, or pixels, in the image. The brightness at these points is quantized into discrete values; the two-dimensional array of quantized values forms a digital image, the input to the computer vision system. During the feature extraction phase, various algorithms are applied to the digital image to extract salient features such as lines, curves, or regions. The set of these features, represented by a data structure, is then compared to the database of object model data structures in an attempt to identify the object. Clearly, the type of features that need to be extracted from the image depends on the representation of objects in the database.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Agin GJ, Binford TO (1976). Computer description of curved objects. IEEE Transact. Comp. C-25(4):439–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergevin R, Levine MD (1988a). Recognition of 3-D objects in 2-D line drawings: An approach based on geons. Technical Report TR-CIM-88-24, McGill Research Centre for Intelligent Machines, McGill University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergevin R, Levine MD (1988b). Hierarchical decomposition of objects in line drawings. Technical Report TR-CIM-88-25, McGill Research Centre for Intelligent Machines, McGill University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Besl PJ, Jain RC (1985). Three-dimensional object recognition. ACM Comp. Surveys 17(1):75–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biederman I (1985). Human image understanding: Recent research and a theory. Comp. Vision, Graphics, Image Process. 32:29–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binford TO (1971). Visual perception by computer. Proc. IEEE Conf. Systems Control, Miami, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binford TO (1982). Survey of model-based image analysis systems. Int. J. Robotics Res. l(l):18–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolles RC, Horaud P (1986). 3DPO: A three-dimensional part orientation system. Int. J. Robotics 5(3):3–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks RA (1983). Model-based 3-D interpretations of 2-D images. IEEE Transact. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell. 5(2): 140–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakravarty I, Freeman H (1982). Characteristic views as a basic for three-dimensional object recognition. Proc. SPIE Conf. Robot Vision, Arlington VA, 37–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chin RT, Dyer CR (1986). Model-based recognition in robot vision. ACM Comp. Surveys 18(1):67–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson SJ, Pentland AP, Rosenfeld A (1989). A representation for qualitative 3-D object recognition integrating object-centered and viewer-centered models. Technical Report CAR-TR-453, Computer Vision Laboratory, Center for Automation Research, University of Maryland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardiner M (1965). The superellipse: A curve that lies between the ellipse and the rectangle. Sei. Am. 213:222–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimson WEL, Lozano-Perez T (1984). Model-based recognition and localization from sparse range or tactile data. Int. J. Robotics Res. 3(3):3–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huttenlocher DP, Ullman S (1987). Object recognition using alignment. Proc. First Int. Conf. Comp. Vision, London, 102–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ikeuchi K, Kanade T (1988). Automatic generation of object recognition programs. Proc. IEEE 76(8): 1016–1035.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamdan Y, Schwartz JT, Wolfson HJ (1988). On recognition of 3-D objects from 2-D images. Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Robotics Automation, 1407–1413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe DG (1985). Perceptual Organization and Visual Recognition. Kluwer Academic Publishers. Norwell, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulgaonkar PG, Shapiro LG, Haralick RM (1984). Matching ’sticks, plates and blobs’ objects using geometric and relational constraints. Image Vision Comp. 2(2): 85–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nevatia R, Binford TO (1977). Description and recognition of curved objects. Artif. Intell. 8:77–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pentland AP (1986). Perceptual organization and the representation of natural form. Artif. Intell. 28:293–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pentland AP (1987a). Recognition by parts. Proc. First Int. Conf. Comp. Vision, London, 612–620.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pentland AP (1897b). Towards an ideal 3-D CAD system. SPIE Conf. Machine Vision and.

    Google Scholar 

  • Man-Machine Interface, San Diego. Requicha AAG (1980). Representations for rigid solids. ACM Comp. Surveys 12(4): 437–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfeld A (1987). Recognizing unexpected objects: A proposed approach. Proc. 1987 DARPA Image Understanding Workshop, Los Angeles, 620–627.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solina F (1987). Shape recovery and segmentation with deformable part models. Tech. Report MS-CIS-87–111, GRASP LAB 128, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srihari SN (1981). Representation of three-dimensional digital images. ACM Comp. Surveys 13(4):399–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terzopoulos D, Witkin A, Kass M (1987). Symmetry-seeking models and 3D object reconstruction. Int. J. Comp. Vision 1:211–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terzopoulos D, Witkin A, Kass M (1988). Constraints on deformable models: Recovering 3D shape and nonrigid motion. Artif. Intell. 36:91–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson DW, Mundy JL (1987). Model-directed object recognition on the connection machine. Proc. 1987 DARPA Image Understanding Workshop, Los Angeles, 93–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witkin AP, Tenenbaum JM (1983). On the role of structure in vision. In Human and Machine Vision, (J Beck, B Hope, A Rosenfeld, eds.), pp 481–543. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1990 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dickinson, S.J., Pentland, A.P., Rosenfeld, A. (1990). A Representation for Qualitative 3-D Object Recognition Integrating Object-Centered and Viewer-Centered Models. In: Leibovic, K.N. (eds) Science of Vision. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3406-7_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3406-7_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-7998-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-3406-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics