Abstract
I examine here the epistemological and operational consequences of the use of ecological variability in comparative analyses. Ecological variability is used in comparative analyses to describe the possible states of ecological properties and to search for patterns in nature. Success in these goals requires (1) an explicit recognition of the structure and development of ecological variability and (2) appreciation of the important epistemological constraints inherent to the different methods used in the study of ecological variance. Ecological variance is often hierarchical in nature, containing a nested array of scales of variation, each scale contributing peculiar components to the global variability and presenting patterns that may differ across scales. The approach used to examine ecological variability needs, therefore, to be able to cope with the different types of patterns possible (e.g., continuous relationships, boundary conditions, threshold relationships, etc.) and to allow for changes in the existing patterns when sampling across scales. Thus, I contend that increased flexibility in the search for patterns in ecological variability is essential for successful comparative analysis.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Adams, M.S., S. Guilizzoni, and S. Adams. (1978). Relationship of dissolved inorganic carbon to macrophyte photosynthesis in some Italian lakes. Limnol. Oceanogr. 23:912–913.
Allen, P.M. (1985). Ecology, thermodynamics, and self-organization: towards a new understanding of complexity. In: Ecosystem Theory for Biological Oceanography, R.E. Ulanowicz and T. Platt, eds. Can. Bull Fish. Aquat. Sci. 213:3–26.
Allen, T.F.H. and T.W. Hoekstra. (1986). Instability in overconnected and under-connected systems: a matter of relative lag at different hierarchical levels. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Mental Images, Values, and Reality, Vol. I, J.A. Dillon Jr., ed. Society for General Systems Research, Salinas, California, pp. D77–D85.
Allen, T.F.H. and T.B. Starr. (1982). Hierarchy: Perspectives for Ecological Complexity. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Anderson, G.C. (1969). Subsurface chlorophyll maximum in the northeast Pacific Ocean. Limnol. Oceanogr. 14:386–391.
Anderson, R.M. and J. Kalff. (1986). Regulation of submerged aquatic plant distribution in an uniform area of a weed bed. J. Ecol. 74:953–961.
Barnes, H. (1967). Ecology and experimental biology. Helgol. Wiss. Meeresunters. 15:6–26.
Breiman, L., J.H. Friedman, R.A. Olsen, and C.J. Stone. (1984). Classification and Regression Trees. Wadsworth, Belmont, California.
Brinkhurst, R.O. (1974). The Benthos of Lakes. MacMillan Press, London.
Canfield, D.E., Jr. (1981). Prediction of chlorophyll a concentrations in Florida lakes: the importance of phosphorus and nitrogen. Water Resour. Bull. 19:255–262.
Canfield, D.E., Jr. and C.M. Duarte. (1988). Patterns in the biomass and cover of aquatic macrophytes in lakes: a test in Florida lakes. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 45:1976–1982.
Chambers, P.A. and J. Kalff. (1985). Depth distribution and biomass of submerged macrophyte communities in relation to Secchi depth. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 42:701–709.
Cruzado, A. and K.C. Kelley. (1973). Continuous measurements of nutrient concentrations and phytoplankton density in the surface waters of the Western Mediterranean, winter 1970. Thalassia Jugosl. 9:19–24.
Denman, K.L., A. Okubo, and T. Platt. (1977). The chlorophyll fluctuation spectrum in the sea. Limnol. Oceanogr. 22:1033–1038.
Dillon, P.J. and F.H. Rigler. (1974). The phosphorus-chlorophyll relationship in lakes. Limnol. Oceanogr. 19:767–773.
Duarte, C.M. (1987). Biomass and distribution of submerged macrophytes in lakes. Ph.D. Dissertation, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Duarte, C.M. (1990). Time lags in algal growth: generality, causes, and consequences. J. Plankton Res. 12:873–883.
Duarte, C.M. and J. Kalff. (1986). Littoral slope as a predictor of the maximum biomass of submerged macrophyte communities. Limnol. Oceanogr. 31:1072–1080.
Duarte, C.M. and J. Kalff. (1988). The influence of lake morphometry on the response of submerged macrophytes to nutrient additions. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 45:216–221.
Duarte, C.M. and J. Kalff. (1989). The influence of catchment geology and lake depth on phytoplankton biomass. Arch. Hydrobiol. 115:27–40.
Duarte, C.M. and J. Kalff. (1990). Patterns in the submerged macrophyte biomass of lakes and the importance of the scale of analysis in the interpretation. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 47:357–363.
Duarte, C.M. and K. Sand-Jensen. (1990a). Seagrass colonization: patch formation and patch growth in Cymodocea nodosa. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 65:193–200.
Duarte, C.M. and K. Sand-Jensen. (1990b). Seagrass colonization: biomass development and shoot demography in Cymodocea nodosa patches. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 67:97–103.
Duarte, C.M., S. Agusti, and R.H. Peters. (1987). An upper limit to the abundance of aquatic organisms. Oecologia (Berlin) 74:272–276.
Duarte, C.M., J. Kalff, and R.H. Peters. (1986). Patterns in the biomass and cover of aquatic macrophytes in lakes. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 43:1900–1908.
Estrada, M., M. Alcaraz, and C. Marrasé. (1987). Effects of turbulence on the composition of phytoplankton assemblages in marine microcosms. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 38:267–281.
Fee, E.J. (1976). The vertical and seasonal distribution of chlorophyll in lakes of the Experimental Lakes Area, northwestern Ontario: implications for primary production. Limnol. Oceanogr. 21:767–783.
Haidane, J.B.S. (1955). The measurement of variation. Evolution 9:484.
Hara, T. (1988). Dynamics of size structure in plant populations. Trends Ecol. Evol. 3:129–133.
Huribert, S.H. (1984). Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological field experiments. Ecol. Monogr. 54:187–211.
Lakatos, I. (1968). Criticism and the methodology of scientific research programmes. Proceedings Aristotelian Soc. 69:159–186.
Lewontin, R.C. (1966). On the measurement of relative variability. Syst. Zool. 15: 141–142.
Margalef, R. (1978). Life forms of phytoplankton as survival alternatives in an unstable environment. Oceanol. Acta 1:493–509.
Margalef, R. (1982). La Biosfera, entre la Termodinámica y el Juego. Omega, Madrid.
Maso, M. and C.M. Duarte. (1989). The spatial and temporal structure of hydrographic and phytoplankton biomass heterogeneity along the Catalan Coast (NW Mediterranean). J. Mar. Res. 47:813–827.
McCauley, E. and J. Kalff. (1981). Empirical relationships between phytoplankton and zooplankton biomass in lakes. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 38:458–463.
Mentis, M.T. (1988). Hypothetico-deductive and inductive approaches in ecology. Funct. Ecol. 2:5–14.
Montgomery, D.C. and E.A. Peck. (1982). Introduction to Linear Regression Analysis. Wiley, New York.
O’Neill, R. V. (1988). Hierarchical theory and global change. In: Scales and Global Change, T. Rosswall, R.G. Woodmansee, and P.G. Risser, eds. Wiley, New York.
Peters, R.H. (1983). The Ecological Implications of Body Size. Cambridge University Press, New York.
Peters, R.H. (1986). The role of prediction in limnology. Limnol. Oceanogr. 31: 1143–1159.
Peters, R.H. (1987). Los objetivos de la investigation y la naturaleza de la ciencia. Alquibla 10–11:23–29.
Popper, K.R. (1959). The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Hutchinson, London.
Prairie, Y.-T., C.M. Duarte, and J. Kalff. (1989). Unifying nutrient-chlorophyll relationships in lakes. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 46:1176–1182.
Rasmussen, J.B. (1988). Habitat requirements of burrowing mayflies (Ephemeridae-Hexagenia) in lakes, with special reference to the effects of eutrophication. J. North Am. Benthol. Soc. 7:51–64.
Rigler, F.H. (1982). Recognition of the possible: an advantage of empiricism in ecology. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 39:1323–1331.
Rørslett, B. (1987). A generalized spatial niche model for aquatic macrophytes. Aquat. Bot. 29:63–81.
Rose, G.A. and W.C. Leggett. (1990). The importance of scale to predator-prey spatial correlations: An example of Atlantic fishes. Ecology 71:33–43.
Seip, K.L. and H. Ibrekk. (1988). Regression equations for lake management —how far do they go?. Verh. Int. Verein. Limnol. 23:778–785.
Sokal, R.R. and F.J. Rohlf. (1969). Biometry. Freeman, San Francisco.
Thomas, W.H. (1979). Anomalous nutrient-chlorophyll interrelationships in the offshore eastern tropical Pacific Ocean. J. Mar. Res. 37:327–335.
Turing, A. (1952). The chemical basis of morphogenesis. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London B 237:37–72.
Vaqué, D, C Marrasé, V. Iñiguez, and M. Alcaraz. (1989). Zooplankton influence on the phytoplankton bacterioplankton coupling. J. Plankton Res. 11:625–632.
Vollenweider, R.A. (1987). Scientific concepts and methodologies pertinent to lake research and lake restoration. Schweiz. Z. Hydrol. 49:129–147.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1991 Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Duarte, C.M. (1991). Variance and the Description of Nature. In: Cole, J., Lovett, G., Findlay, S. (eds) Comparative Analyses of Ecosystems. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3122-6_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3122-6_15
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-7804-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-3122-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive