Abstract
Work on eye movements in reading received a considerable new impetus starting in about 1975, when several research groups began using computers to control eye movement experiments “on-line” (McConkie & Rayner, 1975; O’Regan, 1979; Reder, 1973). The idea of a “moving window” allowing only a limited amount of text to be visible around the instantaneous eye position was an appealing technique that allowed researchers to measure the size of the “perceptual span,” that is, the zone around the fixation point from which different kinds of information is gathered. My own feeling at that time, and I believe also the feeling of other workers, was that the most reasonable thing that the eye might be doing in reading would be to adjust its saccades so that from moment to moment, the edges of successive perceptual spans would just touch, or overlap by a fixed amount. In that way, at moments when the text is easy to predict, or the words easy to recognize, the eye would be able to make larger saccades than when the eye was moving into less predictable or more difficult territory. This view of reading could be called the “perceptual span control” hypothesis (Jacobs & O’Regan, 1987). The perceptual span control hypothesis is at the root of a very large body of research in which perceptual span is measured by making perturbations in the information available in parafoveal vision (for a review see Rayner & Pollatsek, 1987): in this research, changes in eye movements are assumed to indicate changes in perceptual span. However, it has not usually been realized that this assumption can only be true to the extent that perceptual span actually directly determines eye movements.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Coëffé, C. (1987). Two ways of improving saccade accuracy. In J.K. O’Regan & A. Lévy-Schoen (Eds.), Eye movements: from physiology to cognition (pp. 105–113). Amsterdam: North Holland.
Coëffé, C, & O’Regan, J.K. (1987). Reducing the influence of non-target stimuli on saccade accuracy: predictability and latency effects. Vision Research, 27, 227–240.
Dunn-Rankin, P. (1978). The visual characteristics of words. Scientific American, 238, 122–130.
Findlay, J.M. (1981). Local and global influences on saccadic eye movements. In: D.F. Fisher, R.A. Monty, J.W. Senders (Eds.), Eye movements: Cognition and visual perception (pp. 171–180). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Findlay, J.M. (1982). Global visual processing for saccadic eye movements. Vision Research, 21, 347–354.
Findlay, J.M. (1987). Visual computation and saccadic eye movements: a theoretical perspective. Spatial Vision, 2, 175–189.
Holmes, V.M., & O’Regan, J.K. (1987). Decomposing French words. In J.K. O’Regan & A. Lévy-Schoen (Eds.), Eye movements: from physiology to cognition (pp. 459–466). Amsterdam: North Holland.
Inhoff, A.W. (1986). Preparing sequences of saccades under choice reaction conditions: effects of sequence length and context. Acta Psychologica, 61, 211–228.
Jacobs, A.M., & O’Regan, J.K. (1987). Spatial and/or temporal adjustments of scanning behavior to visibility changes. Acta Psychologica, 65, 133–146.
Lévy-Schoen, A., O’Regan, J.K., Jacobs, A.M., & Coeffé, C. (1984). The relation between visibility span and eye movements in various scanning tasks. In A.G. Gale & F. Johnson (Eds.), Theoretical and applied aspects of eye movement research (pp. 133–142). Amsterdam: North Holland.
McConkie, G.W., Kerr, P.W., Reddix, M.D., & Zola, D. (1988). Eye movement control during reading: I. The location of initial eye fixations on words. Vision Research, 28, 1107–1118.
McConkie, G.W., Kerr, P.W., Reddix, M.D., Zola, D., & Jacobs, A.M. (1989) Eye movement control during reading: II: Frequency of refixating a word. Perception and Psychophysics, 46, 245–253.
McConkie, G.W., & Rayner, K. (1975). The span of the effective stimulus during a fixation in reading. Perception and Psychophysics, 17, 578–586.
Nazir, T.A. (1991). On refixations in letter strings: the influence of the oculomotor system. Perception and Psychophysics, 49, 373–389.
Nazir, T.A., O’Regan, J.K., & Jacobs, A.M. (1991). On words and their letters. Bulletin of the Psychonomics Society, 29, 171–174.
O’Regan, J.K. (1979). Eye guidance in reading: evidence for the linguistic control hypothesis. Perception and Psychophysics, 25(6), 501–509.
O’Regan, J.K. (1980). The control of saccade size and fixation duration in reading: the limits of linguistic control. Perception and Psychophysics, 28, 112–117.
O’Regan, J.K. (1981). The convenient viewing position hypothesis. In: D.F. Fisher, R.A. Monty, & J.W. Senders (Eds.), Eye movements: Cognition and visual perception (pp. 289–298). Hillsdale, NS: L. Erlbaum.
O’Regan, J.K. (1983). Elementary perceptual and eye movement control processes in reading. In K. Rayner (Ed.), Eye movements in reading: perceptual and language processes (pp. 121–139). New York: Academic Press.
O’Regan, J.K. (1989). Visual acuity, lexical structure, and eye movements in word recognition. In B.A.G. Elsendoorn & H. Bouma, (Eds.) Working models of human perception (pp. 261–292). London: Academic Press.
O’Regan, J.K. (1990). Eye movements and reading. In E. Kowler (Ed.), Eye movements and their role in visual and cognitive processes (Vol. 4 of Reviews of Oculomotor Research, pp. 395–453). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
O’Regan, J.K., & Jacobs, A.M. (1992). The optimal viewing position effect in word recognition: A challenge to current theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, Human Perception and Performance, 18(1), 185–197.
O’Regan, J.K., & Lévy-Schoen, A. (1987). Eye movement strategy and tactics in word recognition and reading. In M. Coltheart (Ed.); Attention and performance XII: The psychology of reading (pp. 363–383). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
O’Regan, J.K., Lévy-Schoen, A., & Jacobs, A. (1983). The effect of visibility on eye movement parameters in reading. Perception and Psychophysics, 34, 457–464.
O’Regan, J.K., Lévy-Schoen, A., Pynte, J., & Brugaillère, (1984). Convenient fixation location within isolated words of different length and structure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10(2), 250–257.
Rayner, K. (1979). Eye guidance in reading: Fixation locations within words. Perception, 8, 21–30.
Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (1987). Eye movements in reading: A tutorial review. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance XII: The psychology of reading (pp 327–362). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Reder, S.M. (1973). On-line monitoring of eye position signals in contingent and noncontingent paradigms. Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation, 5, 218–227.
Vitu, F. (1991a). The influence of parafoveal preprocessing and linguistic context on the optimal landing position effect. Perception and Psychophysics, 50, 58–75.
Vitu, F. (1991b). The existence of a center of gravity effect during reading. Vision Research, 31, 1289–1313.
Vitu, F., O’Regan, J.K., & Mittau, M. (1990). Optimal landing position in reading isolated words and continuous text. Perception and Psychophysics, 47, 583–600.
Zingale, CM., & Kowler, E. (1987). Planning sequences of saccades. Vision Research, 27, 1327–1341.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1992 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
O’Regan, J.K. (1992). Optimal Viewing Position in Words and the Strategy-Tactics Theory of Eye Movements in Reading. In: Rayner, K. (eds) Eye Movements and Visual Cognition. Springer Series in Neuropsychology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2852-3_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2852-3_20
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-7696-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-2852-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive