Skip to main content

Cellular Interactions During Implantation in Ruminants

  • Conference paper
Molecular and Cellular Aspects of Periimplantation Processes

Part of the book series: Serono Symposia USA ((SERONOSYMP))

Abstract

All mammals so far investigated are similar in that there is a strictly limited period during which the hormonally primed uterine epithelium (UE) will form an intimate association with the blastocyst and initiate implantation. However, the subsequent cellular modifications differ enormously in the various groups, largely reflecting the range of definitive placental structures produced (1). This variety probably reflects the difficulty of balancing the conflicting requirements of fetal nutrition and camouflage; that is, between getting the conceptus as close to the maternal blood as possible for adequate nutrition while maintaining a sufficient barrier to protect its status as an immunologically foreign body. On the fetal side of the placenta, the blood vessel endothelium and covering trophectoderm or chorion always survives, and indeed, the latter may be duplicated (rabbit) or triplicated (rats and mice); the survival of the maternal layers—UE, endometrium, and endothelium—varies from complete loss (humans and rodents) to complete retention (lemurs, camels, and pigs). The cellular and/or syncytial layers formed or lost as a result of implantation are characteristic for any particular species, largely following the updated Grosser classification of epitheliochorial, synepitheliochorial, endotheliochorial, or hemochorial (1).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Wooding FBP, Flint APF. Placentation. In: Lamming GE, ed. Marshalls physiology of reproduction; vol III. 4th ed. London: Chapman and Hall, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wooding FBP, Staples LD, Peacock MA. Structure of trophoblast papillae on the sheep conceptus at implantation. J Anat 1982;134:507–16.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Wathes DC, Wooding FBP. An electron microscope study of implantation in the cow. Am J Anat 1980;159:285–306.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Wooding FBP. Role of binucleate cells in fetomaternal cell fusion at implantation in the sheep. Am J Anat 1984;170:233–50.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wango EO, Wooding FBP, Heap RB. The role of trophoblastic binucleate cells in implantation in the goat: a morphological study. J Anat 1990;171: 241–57.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Allen WR, Hamilton DW, Moor RM. Origin of equine endometrial cups, II: invasion of the endometrium by trophoblast. Anat Rec 1973;177:485–502.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Wooding FBP, Billingsley SA. Cellular dynamics of eCG production by chorionic girdle and endometrial cup cells. J Anat 1991;179:213–4.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Samuel CA, Allen WR, Steven DH. Studies on the equine placenta, II: ultrastructure of the placental barrier. J Reprod Fertil 1976;48:257–64.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Wooding FBP. The synepitheliochorial placenta of ruminants: binucleate cell fusions and hormone production. Placenta 1992;13:101–13.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Wooding FBP, Morgan G, Forsyth IA, et al. Light and electron microscopic studies of cellular localisation of oPL with monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies. J Histochem Cytochem 1992;40:1001–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Morgan G, Wooding FBP. Cell migration in the ruminant placenta, a freeze fracture study. J Ultrastruct Mol Struct Res 1983;83:148–60.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Wooding FBP, Wathes DC. Binucleate cell migration in the bovine placentome. J Reprod Fertil 1980;59:425–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Schlafke S, Enders AC. The cellular basis of interaction between trophoblast and uterine epithelium at implantation. Biol Reprod 1975;12:41–65.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Madara JL. Loosening tight junctions: lessons from the intestine. J Clin Invest 1989;83:1089–94.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Wooding FBP, Morgan G, Brandon MR, Camous S. Membrane dynamics during migration of placental cells through trophectodermal tight junctions in sheep and goats. Cell Tissue Res 1994;276:387–97.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Gogolin-Evans KJ, Lee CS, Mercer WR, Moseley AM, Brandon MR. Characterisation of a sheep trophoblast derived antigen first appearing at implantation. Placenta 1986;7:243–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Wooding, F.B.P., Morgan, G. (1995). Cellular Interactions During Implantation in Ruminants. In: Dey, S.K. (eds) Molecular and Cellular Aspects of Periimplantation Processes. Serono Symposia USA. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2548-5_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2548-5_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-7575-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-2548-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics