Skip to main content

Getting Your Abstract on the Program

  • Chapter
Surgical Research

Abstract

An abstract should be a concise distillate or synopsis of the work being reported and must emphasize what was done, how it was done, the results obtained, and how the author interprets them. In most instances, the organization or publication to which the abstract is submitted defines its length (usually one standard-size, double-spaced typewritten page, i.e., approximately 200 to 250 words), and that limit is inviolable. This required brevity precludes all extraneous material.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Schwartz RJ, Jacobs LM, Gabrum SG, Bennett-Jacobs B. Continuous Quality Improvement Applied to A Scientific Assembly; The History of the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma. J Trauma 1993;35:544–549

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Rennie D and Glass RM. Structuring Abstracts to Make Them More Informative. JAMA 1991; 266: 116–117. Editorial

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Relman AS. New Information For Authors—and Readers. N Engl J Med 1990;56:323

    Google Scholar 

  4. Warren R. The Abstract. Arch Surg 1976;111:635–636

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Baue AE. Writing A Good Abstract Is Not Abstract Writing. Arch Surg 1979;114:11–12

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Pruitt BA Jr Improve Your Next Abstract. Presented At the Seventh Annual Meeting of the American Burn Association, Denver, March 20-22, 1975

    Google Scholar 

  7. American Association for Laboratory Animal Science. How to Prepare an Abstract. Cordova, TN:AALAS, January 1990

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pruitt BA Jr Tips on How to Write Abstracts, for Newer Members of the American Burn Association.Presented at the 21st Annual Meeting of the American Burn Association, New Orleans, March 30, 1989. 9

    Google Scholar 

  9. Koren G. A Simple Way to Improve the Chances for Acceptance of Your Scientific Paper. N Engl J Med 1986;315:1298. Letter

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pruitt, B.A., Mason, A.D. (1998). Getting Your Abstract on the Program. In: Troidl, H., McKneally, M.F., Mulder, D.S., Wechsler, A.S., McPeek, B., Spitzer, W.O. (eds) Surgical Research. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1888-3_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1888-3_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-7325-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-1888-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics