Skip to main content

A Cumulative Belief Degree Approach for Prioritization of Energy Sources: Case of Turkey

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Assessment and Simulation Tools for Sustainable Energy Systems

Part of the book series: Green Energy and Technology ((GREEN,volume 129))

Abstract

Energy planning is difficult to model owing to its complex structure, with numerous decision makers, criteria, and scenarios. Fortunately, decision-making methods can be helpful for the sustainable development of energy, by the evaluation of different energy sources with regard to multiple aspects, for example, economic, environmental, political etc. In this study, a methodology based on a cumulative belief degree approach is proposed for the prioritization of energy sources. The approach enables the use of all types of evaluations, without the loss of any information. It also allows for incomplete expert evaluations which may occur in the energy sources prioritization problem. Turkey, like many countries, generates most of energy from fossil fuels, which are imported mostly from other countries. However, the enormous increase in oil prices, and an emerging energy demand, owing to economic growth and environmental issues, is forcing Turkey to improve its sustainable energy planning. Therefore, the proposed methodology is applied to the energy sources prioritization of Turkey. Results show that solar power and wind should be considered as the priori sources of energy in Turkey.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adamantiades A, Kessides I (2009) Nuclear power for sustainable development: current status and future prospects. Energy Policy 37(12):5149–5166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amer M, Daim TU (2011) Selection of renewable energy technologies for a developing county: a case of Pakistan. Energ Sustainable Dev 15(4):420–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atmaca E, Basar HB (2012) Evaluation of power plants in Turkey using analytic network process (ANP). Energy 44(1):555–563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baris K, Kucukali S (2012) Availability of renewable energy sources in Turkey: current situation, potential, government policies and the EU perspective. Energ Policy 42:377–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cristóbal JRS (2011) Multi-criteria decision-making in the selection of a renewable energy project in Spain: the Vikor method. Renew Energ 36(2):498–502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doukas H, Karakosta C, Psarras J (2010) Computing with words to assess the sustainability of renewable energy options. Expert Syst Appl 37(7):5491–5497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jing YY, Bai H, Wang JJ (2012) A fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making model for CCHP systems driven by different energy sources. Energ Policy 42:286–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jovanović M, Afgan N, Radovanović P, Stevanović V (2009) Sustainable development of the Belgrade energy system. Energy 34(5):532–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kabak O, Ruan D (2011a) A cumulative belief degree-based approach for missing values in nuclear safeguards evaluation. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Energ 23(10):1441–1454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kabak O, Ruan D (2011b) A comparison study of fuzzy MADM methods in nuclear safeguards evaluation. J Global Optim 51(2):209–226

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kahraman C, Kaya I (2010) A fuzzy multi criteria methodology for selection among energy alternatives. Expert Syst Appl 37(9):6270–6281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahraman C, Kaya I, Cebi S (2009) A comparative analysis for multi-attribute selection among renewable energy alternatives using fuzzy axiomatic design and fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. Energy 34(10):1603–1616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaya T, Kahraman C (2010) Multi criteria renewable energy planning using an integrated fuzzy VIKOR and AHP methodology: the case of Istanbul. Energy 35(6):2517–2527

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kaya T, Kahraman C (2011) Multi criteria decision-making in energy planning using a modified fuzzy TOPSIS methodology. Expert Syst Appl 38(6):6577–6585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kowalski K, Stagl S, Madlener R, Omann I (2009) Sustainable energy futures: methodological challenges in combining scenarios and participatory multi-criteria analysis. Eur J Oper Res 197(9):1063–1074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laes E (2006) Nuclear energy and sustainable development. Ph.D. thesis. Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

    Google Scholar 

  • Phdungsilp A (2010) Integrated energy and carbon modeling with a decision support system: policy scenarios for low-carbon city development in Bangkok. Energ Policy 38(9):4808–4817

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pohekar SD, Ramachandran M (2004) Application of multi-criteria decision making to sustainable energy planning: a review. Renew Sustain Energ Rev 8(4):365–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ren H, Gao W, Zhou W, Nakagami K (2009) Multi-criteria evaluation for the optimal adoption of distributed residential energy systems in Japan. Energ Policy 37(12):5484–5493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruan D, Lu J, Laes E, Zhang G, Ma J, Meskens G et al (2010) Multi-criteria group decision support with linguistic variables in long-term scenarios for Belgian energy policy. J Univ Comput Sci 15(1):103–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruan D, Kabak O, Quinones R (2013) An ordered weighted averaging operator-based cumulative belief degree approach for energy policy evaluation. Int J Adv Oper Manage 5(1):58–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Talinli I, Topuz E, Akbay MU (2010) Comparative analysis for energy production processes (EPPs): sustainable energy futures for Turkey. Energ Policy 38(8):4479–4488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Topcu Y, Ulengin F (2004) Energy for the future: an integrated decision aid for the case of Turkey. Energy 29(1):137–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsoutsos T, Drandaki M, Frantzeskaki N et al (2009) Sustainable energy planning by using multi-criteria analysis application in the island of Crete. Energ Policy 37(5): 1587–1600

    Google Scholar 

  • Url-1: International energy association (IEA), http://www.iea.org/speech/2009/Jones/petrotech.pdf, Accessed 8 Oct 2012

  • Url-2: Republic of Turkey, ministry of energy and natural sources, http://www.enerji.gov.tr/yayinlar_raporlar/Turkiye_Enerji_Politikalarimiz.pdf, last access: Accessed 8 Oct 2012

  • Url-3: Republic of Turkey, ministry of energy and natural sources, http://www.enerji.gov.tr/yayinlar_raporlar/Dunyada_ve_Turkiyede_Enerji_Gorunumu.pdf, Accessed 8 Oct 2012

  • Wang JJ, Jing YY, Zhang CF et al (2009) Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy decision-making. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 13(9):2263–2278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang B, Kocaoglu DF, Daim TU et al (2010) A decision model for energy resource selection in China. Energ Policy 38(11):7130–7141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang JB (2001) Rule and utility based evidential reasoning approach for multi-attribute decision analysis under uncertainties. Eur J Oper Res 131:31–61

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Yang JB, Sen P (1994) A general multi-level evaluation process for hybrid MADM with uncertainty. IEEE Trans Syst, Man, Cybern 24(10):1458–1473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang JB, Singh MG (1994) An evidential reasoning approach for multiple attribute decision making with uncertainty. IEEE Trans Syst, Man, Cybern 24(1):1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh LA (1975) The concept of a linguistic variable and its applications to approximate reasoning, Parts I, II, III. information sciences 8(1): 199–249, 8(2):301–357, 9(1): 42–80

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Özgür Kabak .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kabak, Ö., Cinar, D., Hoge, G.Y. (2013). A Cumulative Belief Degree Approach for Prioritization of Energy Sources: Case of Turkey. In: Cavallaro, F. (eds) Assessment and Simulation Tools for Sustainable Energy Systems. Green Energy and Technology, vol 129. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5143-2_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5143-2_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-5142-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-5143-2

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics