Abstract
This chapter outlines the ideas and assumptions on which the ‘Vicarious Learner’ project is based, describes some attempts to test the ideas empirically, and considers the exploitation of the approach in education. The basic idea — expressed in our use of (1986) term vicarious learning — is that through technology we are now able to capture, store and retrieve the records and outputs of real learning episodes, and to make these available for new learners. One important question is whether a database of such material might essentially represent a new kind of courseware, easier and less expensive to generate than conventional courseware. Our project has attempted to demonstrate how the idea might be exploited in practice, and we describe our design of a system, called Dissemination, which compiled such courseware from the recordings of students and tutors engaged in a specially-devised set of ‘task-directed discussions’. In an experiment comparing subjects who were offered this material in addition to conventional courseware we found that those students who chose to use the vicarious resources tended to model in their own performance the tasks, language and approaches used in the discussions they had viewed vicariously. We tentatively conclude that the experience of watching other students learn helped the new learners to model the basic task of learning more effectively. We ask: is this an effective way of ‘learning how to learn’? Certainly, though, this is only part of the story, and in the latter part of the paper we consider how the approach might be effectively exploited.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bandura, A. (1986) Social Foundations of Thought and Action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall
Clark, H.H. (1996) Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Cox, R., McKendree, J., Tobin, R., Lee, J. & Mayes, J.T. (1999) Vicarious learning from dialog and discourse: A controlled comparison, Instructional Science, 27, pp431–458
Fowler, C.J.H. & Mayes, J.T. (1997) Applying telepresence to education. BT Technology Journal, 15 (4) pp189–196
Fowler, C.J.H. & Mayes, J.T. (1999) Learning relationships: from theory to design. Association for Learning Technology Journal, 7 (3) pp6–16
Henri, F. (1991) Computer conferencing and content analysis. In O’Malley, C. (Ed.) Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, Springer Verlag
Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE) (2000) Report on a Business Model for the e-University. http://www.hefce.ac.uk
Lee, J., Dineen, F. & McKendree, J. (1998) Supporting student discussions: it isn’t just talk. Education and Information Technology, 3, 217–229
Mayes, J.T. (1992) Cognitive Tools: a suitable case for learning. In Kommers, P., Jonassen, D. & Mayes, J.T. (Eds) Cognitive Toolsfor Learning Springer-Verlag
Mayes, J.T., Coventry, L., Thomson, A. & Mason, R. (1995) Learning through Telematics. ICBL, Heriot-Watt University and Open University. Report for BT Labs
McKendree, J., Stenning, K., Mayes, T., Lee J. & Cox, R. (1998) Why Observing a Dialog may Benefit Learning: The Vicarious Learner. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 14 (2) pp110–119
Morrison, D. & Collins, A. (1995) Epistemic fluency and constructivist learning environments. In Wilson, B.G. (Ed.), Constructivist learning environments: Case studies in instructional design. Englewood Cliffs NJ: Educational Technology Publications
Newman, D.R., Webb, B. & Cochrane, C. (1995) A Content Analysis Method to Measure Critical Thinking in Face-to-Face and Computer Supported Group Learning, International Computing and Technology: An electronic Journal for the 21st Century 3 (2) pp56–77
Pilkington, R. (1996) Interacting with computer-based simulation: the role of dialog, Computers and Education, 27 (1) pp1–14
Skehan, P. (1998) A Cognitive Approach to Language Learning, Oxford UP, Oxford
Sproull, L. & Kiesler, S. (1993) Connections: New Ways of Working in the Networked Organization (3rd edition), London: MIT Press
Stenning, K., McKendree, J., Lee, J., Cox, R., Dineen, F. & Mayes, T. (2000) Vicarous Learning from Educational Dialog. In Hoadley, C. & Roschelle, J. (Eds.) Proceedings of the Computer-Support for Cooperative Learning (CSCL) 1999 Conference. Dec. 12–15, Stanford University, Calif. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum. pp341–347. http://kn.cilt.orglcscl99/A43/A43.htm
Wenger, E. (1998) Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer-Verlag London
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mayes, T., Dineen, F., McKendree, J., Lee, J. (2002). Learning from Watching Others Learn. In: Steeples, C., Jones, C. (eds) Networked Learning: Perspectives and Issues. Computer Supported Cooperative Work. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0181-9_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0181-9_12
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-85233-471-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-0181-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive