Skip to main content

Abusing the Human–Animal Bond: On the Making of Fighting Dogs

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Psychology of the Human-Animal Bond

Abstract

Among the countless animals throughout history who have been tamed to serve humans, there is only one who serves by choice – the dog (Wilcox & Walkowicz, 1995). Dogs display “an inexhaustible willingness to form and sustain partnerships with humans” (Hart, 1995, p. 167), and they are the only species that assist humans in various social needs as police, therapy, and search and rescue animals (Udell & Wynne, 2008), sometimes to the endangerment of their own survival (Shewmake, 2002). It is well known that dogs have been selectively bred for socio-cognitive abilities and attachment to humans. They are thus strongly bonded to humans in relationships that consist of attachment behaviors similar to those found in child–parent and chimpanzee–human relations (Topál, Miklósi, Csányi, & Dóka, 1998). Humans have taken advantage of this bond of attachment to create ferocious, fighting dogs – animals that are intensely loyal and willing to fight to the death to protect humans and their property. Taking a creature with toddler psychology and behavior and making it an aggressive fighting dog creates an animal dominated by fear (Meisterfeld & Pecci, 2000) and one who participates in dogfighting out of intense loyalty to the bond he has with humans.

You became responsible, forever, for what you have tamed.

(Little Prince by A. de Saint-Exupery)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The archeological evidence is unclear as to whether the species was a wolf, dog or jackal (see Juliet Clutton-Brock, 1987, p. 58).

  2. 2.

    The word “persona” comes from the Etruscan “phersu” or mask.

  3. 3.

    One of us (Iliopoulou) is a DVM who assesses animal cruelty cases for a local Animal Control organization. Of the 14 dogs she examined over a two-month period in 2010, 13 were pit bulls and 1 was a Rottweiler mix, all were starved, 7 had wounds suggestive of dogfighting, 3 had their ears cropped with scissors, 2 had been beaten by their owners, and 5 were tethered with heavy chains (one of whom had no teeth because of her efforts to chew through her tether). Eleven of the 14 dogs were submissive and exceptionally human friendly (one so scared that she urinated involuntarily every time she was touched) and wagged their tails frantically every time they were praised as good, sweet dogs.

References

  • AVMA (American Veterinary Medical Association) Task Force on Canine Aggression and Human-Canine Interaction. (2001). A community approach to dog bite prevention. Retrieved from http://www.avma.org/public_health/dogbite/dogbite.pdf

  • Boitani, L., Francisci, F., Ciucci, P., & Andreoli, G. (1995). Population biology and ecology of feral dogs in central Italy. In J. Serpell (Ed.), The domestic dog: Its evolution, behavior, and interaction with people (pp. 217–244). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brownstein, O. (1969). The popularity of baiting in England before 1600: A study in social and theatrical history. Educational Theatre Journal, 21, 237–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cashmore, E. (2005). Making sense of sports. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chris, C. (2006). Watching wildlife. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock, J. (1987). Animals as domesticates: A worldview through history. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock, J. (2011). Animals as domesticates: A worldview through history. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J., & Richardson, J. (2002). Pit bull panic. Journal of Popular Culture, 36, 285–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coile, D. C. (2005). Encyclopedia of dog breeds. Hauppauge, NY: Barron’s Educational Series.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, H. G. K. (1994). Cockfighting on the Venezuelan island of Margarita: A ritualized form of male aggression. In A. Dundes (Ed.), The cockfight: A casebook (pp. 232–240). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coppinger, R., & Coppinger, L. (2002). Dogs: A new understanding of canine origin, behavior, and evolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, H. P. (1970). The new dog encyclopedia. Harrisburg, PA: Stackpole Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delise, K. (2002). Fatal dog attacks: The stories behind the statistics. Manorville, NY: Anubis Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delise, K. (2007). The pit bull placebo: The media, myths and politics of canine aggression. Manorville, NY: Anubis Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickey, S. (1991). Shakespeare’s mastiff comedy. Shakespeare Quarterly, 42, 255–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Driscoll, C. A., & Macdonald, D. W. (2010). Top dogs: Wolf domestication and wealth. Journal of Biology, 9, 10.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dundes, A. (1994). Gallus as phallus: A psychoanalytic cross-cultural consideration of the cockfight as fowl play. In A. Dundes (Ed.), The cockfight: A casebook (pp. 241–282). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, R., Kalich, D., & Forsyth, C. J. (1998). Dogfighting: Symbolic expression and validation of masculinity. Sex Roles, 39, 825–832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, C. P., & Hunthhausen, W. (2006). The American pit bull terrier. Neptune City, NJ: T.F.H. Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, H. (2005). Dog fighting detailed discussion. Animal Legal and Historical Center, Michigan State University College of Law. Retrieved from http://www.animallaw.info/articles/ddusdogfighting.htm

  • Hare, B., Brown, M., Williamson, C., & Tomasello, M. (2002). The domestication of social cognition in dogs. Science, 298, 1634–1636.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hare, B., & Tomasello, M. (2005). Human-like social skills in dogs? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 439–444.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, L. A. (1995). Dogs as human companions: Review of the relationship. In J. Serpell (Ed.), The domestic dog: Its evolution, behavior, and interaction with people (pp. 161–177). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irvine, L. (2004). If you tame me: Understanding our connection with animals. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalof, L. (Ed.). (2007a). A cultural history of animals in antiquity. Oxford: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalof, L. (2007b). Looking at animals in human history. London: Reaktion Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalof, L., Fitzgerald, A., & Baralt, L. (2004). Animals, women, and weapons: Blurred sexual boundaries in the discourse of sport hunting. Society & Animals, 12, 237–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalof, L., & Taylor, C. (2007). The discourse of dog fighting. Humanity & Society, 31, 319–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaspersson, M. (2008). On treating the symptoms and not the cause: Reflections on the dangerous dogs act. Papers from the British Criminology Conference. Retrieved from http://www.britsoccrim.org/volume8/13Kaspersson08.pdf

  • Kyle, D. G. (1998). Spectacles of death in ancient Rome. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacInnes, I. (2003). Mastiffs and spaniels: Gender and nation in the English dog. Textual Practice, 17, 21–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marvin, G. (1988). Bullfight. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meisterfeld, C. W., & Pecci, E. F. (2000). Dog & human behavior: Amazing parallels, similarities. Petaluma, CA: MRK Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morell, V. (2009, August 28). Going to the dogs. Science Magazine, 325, 1062–1065.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naderi, S. Z., Miklósi, A., Dóka, A., & Csányi, V. (2002). Does dog-human attachment affect their inter-specific cooperation? Acta Biologica Hungarica, 53, 537–550.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • National Animal Interest Alliance. (n.d.). Germany bans breeds, reactions evoke holocaust memories. Retrieved from http://www.naiaonline.org/articles/archives/germany.htm.

  • Overall, K. L. (1997). Clinical behavioral medicine for small animals. St. Louis, MO: Mosby-Year Book, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serpell, J. (Ed.). (1995). The domestic dog: Its evolution, behavior, and interaction with people. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serpell, J. (1996). In the company of animals. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shewmake, T. (2002). Canine courage. Portage, MI: PageFree Publishing, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siebert, C. (2010, June 7). The animal-cruelty syndrome. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/13/magazine/13dogfighting-t.html?pagewanted=1&hp.

  • Stokes, J. (1996). Bull and bear baiting in Somerset: The gentles’ sport. In A. F. Johnston & W. Husken (Eds.), English parish drama (pp. 65–80). Amsterdam: Rodopi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strutt, J. (1903). In J. C. Cox (Ed.), The sports and pastimes of the people of England. London; New York: Augustus M. Kelley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, K. (1983). Man and the natural world: A history of the modern sensibility. New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Topál, J., Miklósi, A., Csányi, V., & Dóka, A. (1998). Attachment behavior in dogs (Canis familiaris): A new application of Ainsworth’s (1969) strange situation test. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 112(3), 219–229.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tuan, Y. F. (1984). Dominance and affection: The making of pets. New Haven, CT; London: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Udell, M. A. R., & Wynne, C. D. L. (2008). A review of domestic dogs’ (Canis familiaris) human-like behaviors: Or why behavior analysts should stop worrying and love their dogs. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 89, 247–261.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox, B., & Walkowicz, C. (1995). The atlas of dog breeds of the world. Neptune City, NJ: TFH Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Linda Kalof .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kalof, L., Iliopoulou, M.A. (2011). Abusing the Human–Animal Bond: On the Making of Fighting Dogs. In: Blazina, C., Boyraz, G., Shen-Miller, D. (eds) The Psychology of the Human-Animal Bond. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9761-6_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics