Skip to main content

A Comparison of Grid-based and Continuous Space Pedestrian Modelling Software: Analysis of Two UK Train Stations

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Pedestrian and Evacuation Dynamics

Abstract

The present paper outlines different approaches to pedestrian modelling, classifying them according to their movement and collision avoidance algorithms. An interesting question, not yet fully explored, is whether the simulation output is markedly different between the two main agent-based approaches. The paper explores this question by considering the operational performance of two rail stations in the UK. A software tool with a grid-based approach to pedestrian movement (STEPS 4.0), and a tool with a continuous approach (Legion Studio 2006) have been used to evaluate the gate-line clearance and platform circulation of passengers with respect to proposed station upgrades and future passenger demand. The paper concludes by summarizing the advantages of each approach, in the light of the findings from these studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Nelson, H.E., Mowrer, F.E.: Emergency Movement. In: DiNenno, P.J. (eds.) The SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering (Third ed.), pp. 3- 367-3- 380. Society of Fire Protection Engineers, Quincy (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kuligowski, E.D., Peacock, R.D.: A Review of Building Evacuation Models, Technical Note 1471. Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol., Gaithersburg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gwynne, S., Galea, E.R., Owen, M., Lawrence, P.J., Filippidis, L.: A Review of the Methodologies Used in the Computer Simulation of Evacuation from the Built Environment. Building and Environment. 34, 741-749 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hoogendoorn, S.P.: Microscopic Simulation of Pedestrian Flows. Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting. National Academy Press, Washington DC (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Castle, C.J.E., Longley, P.A.: Emergency Pedestrian Evacuation Analysis: A Review and Interpretation of Software Applications. In: Sui, D.Z., Cutter, S.L. (Eds.), Geospatial Technologies and Homeland Security: Research Frontiers and Challenges. Springer (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Buckman, L.T., Leather, J.A.: Modelling Station Congestion the Pedroute Way. Traffic Engineering and Control. 35:6, 373-377 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Galea, E.R., Perez Galparsoro, J.M.: A Computer Based Simulation Model for the Prediction of Evacuation from Mass Transport Vehicles. Fire Safety Journal. 22, 341-366 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hoffmann, N.A., Henson, D.A.: Simulating Transient Evacuation and Pedestrian Movements in Stations. International Conference on Mass Transit Management. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Tobias, K., Schreckenberg, M.: F.A.S.T. - Floor Field and Agent-based Simulation Tool. International Symposium of Transport Simulation 2006(ISTS06), 4 - 6th September. Lausanne, Switzerland (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kretz, T., Bönisch, C., Vortisch, P.: Comparison of Various Methods for the Calculation of the Distance Potential Field. In: Klingsch, W.W.F., Rogsch, C., Schadschneider, A., Schreckenberg, M. (eds.), Pedestrian and Evacuation Dynamics 2008. Springer (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Helbing, D., Molnár, P.: Social Force Model for Pedestrian Dynamics. Physical Review E. 51, 4282-4286 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Thompson, P.A.: Developing New Techniques for Modelling Crowd Movement. PhD Thesis, University of Edinburgh (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  13. MacDonald, M.: STEPS Software, http://www.steps.mottmac.com (2010)

  14. Legion, Legion Software, http://www.legion.com (2010)

  15. LUL, Best Practice Guide - Station Modelling With Legion. London Underground Limited, UK (2009)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. J. E. Castle .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this paper

Cite this paper

Castle, C.J.E., Waterson, N.P., Pellissier, E., Le Bail, S. (2011). A Comparison of Grid-based and Continuous Space Pedestrian Modelling Software: Analysis of Two UK Train Stations. In: Peacock, R., Kuligowski, E., Averill, J. (eds) Pedestrian and Evacuation Dynamics. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9725-8_39

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9725-8_39

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-9724-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-9725-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics