Skip to main content

Abstract

As stated in the Preface, it is the aim of this book to trace the creation of classical statistics, and to show that it was principally the work of two men, Fisher and Neyman. Since the main story is somewhat lost in the details, let us now review their contributions to hypothesis testing, estimation, design, and the philosophy of statistics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 34.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For references to early work of Ramsey and de Finetti, see Forcina (1982).

  2. 2.

    Recent advances in computer technology make randomization tests based on the actual values practically feasible, although not necessarily more efficient.

References

  • Bennett, J. H. (Ed.) (1990). Statistical Inference and Analysis: Selected Correspondence of R. A. Fisher. Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Forcina, A. (1982). Gini’s contributions to the theory of inference. International Statistical Review 50, 65-70.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hampel, F. R.; Ronchetti, E. M.; Rousseeuw, P. J.; and Stahel, W. A. (1986). Robust Statistics: The Approach Based on Influence Functions. Wiley, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hotelling, H. and Pabst, M. R. (1936). Rank correlation and tests of significance involving no assumption of normality. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 7, 29-43.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Jureckova, J. and Sen, P. K. (1996). Robust Statistical Procedures. Wiley, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann, E. L. (2009). Parametrics vs. nonparametrics: Two alternative methodologies. Journal of Nonparametric Statistics 21, 397-405.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Neyman, J. (1934). On the two different aspects of the representative method: the method of stratified sampling and the method of purposive selection. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 97, 558-625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neyman, J. and Pearson, E. S. (1928). On the use and interpretation of certain test criteria. Biometrika 20A, 175-240, 263-295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neyman, J. and Pearson, E. S. (1933a). On the problem of the most efficient tests of statistical hypotheses. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society (A) 231, 289-337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neyman, J. and Pearson, E. S. (1933b). On the testing of statistical hypothesis in relation to probabilities a priori. Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 24, 492-510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pitman, E. J. G. (1947). Lecture Notes on Nonparametric Statistics (Unpublished). University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staudte, R. G. and Sheather, S. J. (1990). Robust Estimation and Testing. Wiley, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lehmann, E.L. (2011). Epilog. In: Fisher, Neyman, and the Creation of Classical Statistics. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9500-1_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics