Skip to main content

Debriefing After Simulation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The SAGES Manual of Quality, Outcomes and Patient Safety

Abstract

Definitions of the term “Debriefing” generally describe a process to elicit information pertaining to an experienced event in order to gain a better understanding of it. This process is further distinguished by the requirement that the information elicited be from the event’s participants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Selected Readings

  1. Kolb D. Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Salas E, Klein C, King H, et al. Debriefing medical teams: 12 evidence-based best practices and tips. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2008;34:518–27.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lederman LC. Debriefing: toward a systematic assessment of theory and practice. Simul Gaming. 1992;23:145–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Petranek C. A maturation in experiential learning: principles of simulation and gaming. Simul Gaming. 1994;25:513–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fanning RM, Gaba DM. The role of debriefing in simulation-based learning. Simul Healthcare. 2007;2:115–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Thiagarajan ST. Gameletter. http://www.thiagi.com/pfp/IE4H/august2008.html (2008). Accessed 12 Sept 2010.

  7. Rudolph JW, Simon R, Raemer DB, Eppich WJ. Debriefing as formative assessment: closing performance gaps in medical education. Acad Emerg Med. 2008;15:1010–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Savoldelli GL, Naik NV, Park J, et al. Value of debriefing during simulated crisis management. Anesthesiology. 2006;105:279–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Savoldelli GL, Naik VN, Hamstra SJ, et al. Barriers to the use of simulation-based education. Can J Anesth. 2005;52:944–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Stewart L. Ethical issues in postexperimental and postexperiential debriefing. Simul Gaming. 1992;23:196–211.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. DASH© – Debriefing Assessment for Simulation in Healthcare: The Center for Medical Simulation. http://www.harvardmedsim.org/debriefing-assesment-simulation-healthcare.php. Accessed 10 Nov 2010.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Neal E. Seymour MD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Seymour, N.E. (2012). Debriefing After Simulation. In: Tichansky, MD, FACS, D., Morton, MD, MPH, J., Jones, D. (eds) The SAGES Manual of Quality, Outcomes and Patient Safety. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7901-8_50

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7901-8_50

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-7900-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-7901-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics