Abstract
Thirty-six single genes of 6 plants inferred 18 unique trees using maximum parsimony. Such incongruence is an important challenge. How to reconstruct the congruent tree is still one of the most challenges in molecular phylogenetics. For resolving this problem, a genome-wide EST data mining approach was systematically investigated by retrieving a large size of EST data of 144 shared genes of 6 green plants from GenBank. The results show that the concatenated alignments approach overcame incongruence among single-gene phylogenies and successfully reconstructed the congruent tree of 6 species with 100% jackknife support across each branch when 144 genes was used. Jackknife supports of correct branches increased with number of genes linearly, but the number of wrong branches also increased linearly. For inferring the congruent tree, a minimum of 30 genes were required. This approach may provide potential power in resolving conflictions of phylogenies.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Goodman M, Romero-Herrera AE, Dene H, Czelusniak J, Tashian RE (1982) Amino acid sequence evidence on the phylogeny of primates, other eutherians. In: Goodman M (Ed) Macromolecular Sequences in Systematic and Evolutionary Biology. Plenum, New York, pp. 115–191.
Hedges SB (1994) Molecular evidence for the origin of birds. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91:2621–2624.
Russo CAM, Takezaki N, Nei M (1996) Efficiencies of different genes and different tree-building methods in recovering a known vertebrate phytogeny. Mol Biol Evol 13:525–536.
Doolittle WF (1999) Phylogenetic classification and the universal tree. Science 284:2124–2128.
Wolf YI, Rogozin IB, Grishin NV, Koonin EV (2002) Genome trees, the tree of life. Trends Genet 18:472–479.
Yang Z (1996) Maximum-likelihood models for combined analysis of multiple sequence data. J Mol Evol 42:587–596.
Huelsenbeck JP, Bull JJ, Cunningham CW (1996) Combining data in phylogenetic analysis. TREE 11:152–158.
Kluge AG (1989) A concern for evidence and a phylogenetic hypothesis of relationships among Epicrates (Boidae, Serpentes). Syst Zool 38:7–25.
Miyamoto MM, Fitch WM (1995) Testing species phylogenies and phylogenetic methods with congruence. Syst Biol 44:64–76.
Baldauf SL, Roger AJ, Wenk-Siefert I, Doolittle WF (2000) A kingdom-level phylogeny of eukaryotes based on combined protein data. Science 290:972–977
Rokas A, Williams BL, King N, Carroll SB (2003) Genome-scale approaches to resolving incongruence in molecular phylogenies. Nature 425:798–804.
Gee H (2003) Evolution, ending incongruence. Nature 425:782.
Soltis DE et al (2004) Genome-scale data, angiosperm relationships, and ending incongruence: A cautionary tale in phylogenetics. Trends Plant Sci 9:477–483.
Fitz-Gibbon ST, House CH (1999) Whole genome-based phylogenetic analysis of free-living microorganisms. Nucl Acids Res 27:4218–4222.
Phillips MJ, Delsuc F, Penny D (2004) Genome-scale phylogeny and the detection of systematic biases. Mol Biol Evol 21:1455–1458.
Panchen AL (1992) Classification, Evolution and the Nature of Biology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Cronquist A (1981) An Integrated System of Classification of Flowering Plants. Columbia University Press, New York.
Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG (1997) The ClustalX windows interface: Flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucl Acids Res 25:4876–4882.
Swofford D (2002) PAUP*: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods) (Version 4). Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
Kurzman CP, Robnett CJ (2003) Phylogenetic relationships among yeasts of the ‘Saccharomyces complex’ determined from multigene sequence analysis. FEM Yeast Res 3:417–432.
Barkman TJ et al (2000) Independent and combined analyses of sequences from all three genomic compartments converge on the root of flowering plant phylogeny. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:13166–13177.
Brown JR, Douady JD, Italia MJ, Marchall WE, Stanhope MJ (2001) Universal trees based on large combined protein sequence data sets. Nat Genet 28:281–285.
Felsenstein J (1981) Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol 17:368–376.
Acknowledgments
Part of this research was conducted by YS at Atlantic Bioinformatics Centre. This work was partially supported by the NSERC grant ORGPIN 341854, the CRC grant 950-2-3617, and the CFI grant 203617.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this paper
Cite this paper
Shan, Y., Gras, R. (2010). Genome-Wide EST Data Mining Approaches to Resolving Incongruence of Molecular Phylogenies. In: Arabnia, H. (eds) Advances in Computational Biology. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol 680. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5913-3_27
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5913-3_27
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-5912-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-5913-3
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)