Skip to main content

Defining and Theorizing the Third Sector

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Third Sector Research

Abstract

According to some, the third sector is unsuited to singular definitions because it is by its nature unruly. However, different definitions or theorizations can be identified. Ontologically oriented definitions of the third sector offer differing views on what it is made up of and what is excluded. Thus, an “American” view defines it as a separate sector characterized by organized, private, nonprofit, and voluntary entities. A “European” definition sees it as a hybrid phenomenon combining and connecting other sectors such as state and market (this allows social enterprises and [welfare] state bodies in). In contrast, epistemologically oriented theorizations treat the third sector more as a process or form of practice: a particular type of communication (following systems theory), a form of ordering and governing of people (following discourse theory), or a form of struggle or dialogue between social forces (following critical theory).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Åkerstøm, N. (2003). Discursive Analytical Strategies: Understanding Foucault, Koselleck, Laclau, Luhmann, Bristol, The Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Åkerstøm, N. (2008). Partnerships: Machines of Possibility, Bristol, The Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, A., Osborne, T., and Rose, N. (1996). Foucault and Political Reason: Liberalism, Neo-liberalism and Rationalities of Government, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Centre for Civil Society. (2009). What is civil society? http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/CCS/ introduction/what_is_civil_society.htm

  • Clegg, S. R., Rhodes, C., and Kornberger, M. (2007). Desperately seeking legitimacy: Organizational identity and emerging industries. Organization Studies, 28, 495–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Defourny, J., and Nyssens, M. (2006). Defining social enterprise. In M. Nyssens (ed.) Social Enterprise: At the Crossroads of Market, Public Policies and Civil Society (pp. 29–49), London, Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni, A. (1973). The third sector and domestic missions. Public Administration Review, 33(4), 314–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evers, A. (1995). Part of the welfare mix: The third sector as an intermediate area. Voluntas, 6(2), 159–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. ([1978] 2002). Governmentality. In M. Foucault, Power: The Works of Michel Foucault, London, Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from The Prison Notebooks, New York, International Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenei, G., and Kuti, E. (2008). The third sector and civil society. In S. P. Osborne (ed.) The Third Sector in Europe: Prospects and Challenges (pp. 9–24), London, Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaldor, M. (2002). Civil society and accountability. Occasional background paper for HDR, UNDP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaldor, M. (2003). Global Civil Society: An Answer to War? Cambridge, Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, H. (2006). Gramsci, hegemony, and global civil society networks. Voluntas, 17(4), 332–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kendall, J., and Knapp, M. (1995). Voluntary Means, Social Ends, Canterbury, PSSRU.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laville, J.-L, Borzaga, C., Defourny, J., Evers, A., Lewis, J., Nyssens, M., and Vestoff, P. (1999). Third system: A European definition. Paper prepared for the European Commission pilot action “Third system and employment” http://www.istr.org/networks/europe/laville.evers.etal.pdf

  • Lewis, D. (2003). Theorizing the organization and management of non-governmental development organizations: Towards a composite approach. Public Management Review, 5(3), 325–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipschutz, R. D. (2005). Global civil society and global governmentality: Resistance, reform or resignation? In G. Baker and D. Chandler (eds) Global Civil Society: Contested Futures (pp. 171–185), London, Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Audit Office (NAO). (2009). Building the Capacity of the Third Sector, London, House of Commons, http://www.nao.org.uk/publications/0809/building_the_capacity_of_the_t.aspx

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyssens, M. (2008). The third sector and the social inclusion agenda: The role of social enterprises in the field of work integration. In S. P. Osborne (ed.) The Third Sector in Europe: Prospects and Challenges (pp. 87–102), London, Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, S. P. (ed.) (2008). The Third Sector in Europe: Prospects and Challenges, London, Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Priller, E., and Zimmer, A. (eds) (2001). Der Dritte Sektor international. Berlin, Sigma.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridley-Duff, M. B., and Seanor, P. (2008). Understanding social enterprise: Theory and practice. Introduction to a new textbook, SERC Conference, http://www.lsbu.ac.uk/bcim-cgcm/conferences/serc/2008/speakers/theory-and-practice-paper.pdf

  • Salamon, L. M., and Anheier, H. K. (1997). The third world’s third sector in comparative perspective. Working papers of The Johns Hopkins Comparative Nonprofit Sector Project, no. 24, The Johns Hopkins Institute for Policy Studies, Baltimore, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sending, O. J., and Neumann, I. B. (2006). Governance to governmentality: Analyzing NGOs, states, and power. International Studies Quarterly, 50(3), 651–672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Olaf Corry .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Corry, O. (2010). Defining and Theorizing the Third Sector. In: Taylor, R. (eds) Third Sector Research. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5707-8_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics