Skip to main content

Australia: Indigenous Cultural Property Return

  • Reference work entry
Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology

Introduction

Although there are some earlier exceptions, the return of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultural property from museums in Australia has been a point of significant debate since the 1970s. Driven by the voice of Indigenous Australians and undertaken in often tense dialogue with museum professionals, anthropologists, and archaeologists (and these groups are not necessarily all mutually exclusive), the debate has led to significant development in museum ethics, policy, and practice in Australia, a change in the way that “ownership” of such items (and thus decision making about, or influence over, them) is viewed, and has consequently resulted in the return of some types of cultural property to Indigenous groups in this country (Turnbull & Pickering 2010; Pickering 2011). The Australian history of the return of Indigenous cultural property is an informative case study, as similar changes within the same time frame occurred in other countries with indigenous...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 5,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Clarke, P & C. Anderson. 1997. A brief history of Aboriginal men’s secret sacred objects in Australian museums, in Unlocking museums: the proceedings of the 4 th National Conference of Museums Australia: 172-6. Darwin: Museums Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fforde, C. 2004. Collecting the dead: archaeology and the reburial issue. London: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fforde, C. & J. Hubert. 2006. Indigenous human remains and changing museum ideology, in R. Layton, S. Shennan & P. Stone (ed.) A future for archaeology. London: UCL Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fforde, C. & L. Ormond Parker. 2001. Repatriation developments in the UK. Indigenous Law Bulletin 5(6): 9-13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubert, J. 1989. A proper place for the dead: a critical review of the ‘reburial’ issue, in R. Layton (ed.) Conflict in the archaeology of living traditions: 131-166. London: Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansell, M. 1990. The case for bringing Shiney home. Australian Financial Review 28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulvaney, J. 1991. Past regained, future lost: the Kow Swamp Pleistocene burials. Antiquity 65: 12-21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Museums Australia. 2005. Continuing cultures, ongoing responsibilities: principles and guidelines for Australian museums working with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultural heritage. Museums Australia Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickering, M. 2011. Dance through the minefield: the development of practical ethics for repatriation, in J. Marstine (ed.) The Routledge companion to museum ethics. Redefining ethics for the twenty-first century museum: 256-274. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, L. 1981. The Aboriginal Tasmanians. St Lucia: University of Queensland Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, M. 2002. The plundered past: Britain’s challenge for the future, in C. Fforde, J. Hubert & P. Turnbull (ed.) The dead and their possessions: repatriation in principle, policy and practice: 199-217. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tasmanian Aboriginal Centre. 2001. Submission to the Department of Media, Culture and Sport Working Group on Human Remains. WGHR35. Available at: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ http://www.culture.gov.uk/hr_cons_responses/wg_submission/S35Parti.pdf (accessed 10 June 2012).

  • Truscott, M. 2006. Repatriation of Indigenous cultural property. Paper prepared for the 2006 Australian State of the Environment Committee, Department of the Environment and Heritage, Canberra. Available at: http://www.deh.gov.au/soe/2006/emerging/repatriation/index.html.

  • Turnbull, P. 1994. To what strange uses: the procurement and use of Aboriginal peoples’ bodies in early colonial Australia. Voices 4(3): 5-20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turnbull, P. & M. Pickering. (ed.) 2010: The long way home: the meaning and values of repatriation. New York: Berghahn Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, G. & K. Akerman. 2008. For now and forever: An analysis of current and emerging needs for Aboriginal cultural stores and repositories in Western Australia. Perth: Western Australian Museum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, S. 1987. Reburying Australian skeletons. Antiquity 61: 292-6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weatherall, R. 1989. Aborigines, archaeologists and the rights of the dead. Paper presented at the 1989 WAC Inter-Congress, Vermillion, South Dakota.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, L. 1989. Made radical by my own: an archaeologist learns to accept reburial, in R. Layton (ed.) Conflict in the archaeology of living traditions: 60-7. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cressida Fforde .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this entry

Cite this entry

Fforde, C. (2014). Australia: Indigenous Cultural Property Return. In: Smith, C. (eds) Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0465-2_1275

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0465-2_1275

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-0426-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-0465-2

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and Law

Publish with us

Policies and ethics