Abstract
Our focus is a topic not often discussed in science education: reading. We argue that it should be front and centre. This chapter is intended for science educators on the front lines of education, whether serving as teachers in the classroom, as curriculum developers or as science curriculum administrators. Here, we first describe some research-based guidelines for teaching science reading comprehension. Teaching reading comprehension to science classes means teaching students – who can already read, that is, decode (i.e. pronounce or ‘sound out’) words – ‘a few’ reading comprehension strategies. In subsequent sections, we provide a more detailed description of approaches linked to students’ prior knowledge, their motivation, and the methods of teacher modelling. Explicitly explaining a strategy to students must be integrated with teachers modelling, as extensively illustrated. Teachers doing so describe and illustrate in front of a class how they apply a selected strategy when reading a short passage of science text. If science teachers take valuable class time to teach a few reading comprehension strategies, students are likely to learn more science from texts, perform better on verbally-loaded examinations and outperform other neglected learners in future science courses and in understanding science later in life. Research consistently suggests that hoping that students will ‘naturally discover’ how to comprehend informational texts is a sure-fire way, at best, of delaying students’ abilities to extract meaning (i.e. comprehension) from science texts. The unsystematic trial-and-error methods of the past, with their unguided, independent and inefficient ‘naturally discover’ methods, forces students to rely on fend-for-yourself approaches. Such approaches are most harmful to less-academic students, according to the research. Teachers often make the mistake of assuming that students learned informational science reading strategies in elementary school.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Anderson, R. C. (1972). How to construct achievement tests to assess comprehension. Review of Educational Research, 42, 145–170.
Bonner, J. E., & Holliday, W. G. (2006). How college science students engage in note-taking strategies. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43, 786–818.
Holliday, W. G. (2004). Choosing science textbooks: Connecting research to common sense. In E. W. Saul (Ed.), Crossing borders in literacy and science instruction: Perspectives on theory and practice (pp. 383–394). Newark, DE: International Reading Association and Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association.
Holliday, W. G. (2005). A balanced approach to science inquiry teaching. In N. G. Lederman & L. B. Flick (Eds.), Scientific inquiry and nature of science: Implications for teaching, learning, and teacher education (pp. 201–217). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Jetton, T. L., & Dole, J. A. (2004). Adolescent literacy research and practice. New York: The Guildford Press.
Kratzig, G. P., & Arbuthnott, K. D. (2006). Perceptual learning and learning proficiency: A test of the hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 238–246.
Michaels, S., Shouse, A. W., & Schweingruber, H. A. (2008). Ready, set, science! Putting research to work in K–8 science classrooms. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academic Press.
National Research Council. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K–8 (Committee on Science Learning, Kindergarten Through Eighth Grade). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Pressley, M. (2006). Reading instruction that works: The case for balanced teaching. New York: The Guildford Press.
RAND Reading Study Group. (2004). A research agenda for improving reading comprehension. In R. B. Ruddell & N. J. Unrau (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (pp. 720–754). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Waterhouse, L. (2006). Multiple intelligences, the Mozart effect, and emotional intelligence: A critical review. Educational Psychologist, 41, 207–225.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Holliday, W.G., Cain, S.D. (2012). Teaching Science Reading Comprehension: A Realistic, Research-Based Approach. In: Fraser, B., Tobin, K., McRobbie, C. (eds) Second International Handbook of Science Education. Springer International Handbooks of Education, vol 24. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9041-7_90
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9041-7_90
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-9040-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-9041-7
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)