Skip to main content

Teaching Science Reading Comprehension: A Realistic, Research-Based Approach

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Second International Handbook of Science Education

Part of the book series: Springer International Handbooks of Education ((SIHE,volume 24))

Abstract

Our focus is a topic not often discussed in science education: reading. We argue that it should be front and centre. This chapter is intended for science educators on the front lines of education, whether serving as teachers in the classroom, as curriculum developers or as science curriculum administrators. Here, we first describe some research-based guidelines for teaching science reading comprehension. Teaching reading comprehension to science classes means teaching students – who can already read, that is, decode (i.e. pronounce or ‘sound out’) words – ‘a few’ reading comprehension strategies. In subsequent sections, we provide a more detailed description of approaches linked to students’ prior knowledge, their motivation, and the methods of teacher modelling. Explicitly explaining a strategy to students must be integrated with teachers modelling, as extensively illustrated. Teachers doing so describe and illustrate in front of a class how they apply a selected strategy when reading a short passage of science text. If science teachers take valuable class time to teach a few reading comprehension strategies, students are likely to learn more science from texts, perform better on verbally-loaded examinations and outperform other neglected learners in future science courses and in understanding science later in life. Research consistently suggests that hoping that students will ‘naturally discover’ how to comprehend informational texts is a sure-fire way, at best, of delaying students’ abilities to extract meaning (i.e. comprehension) from science texts. The unsystematic trial-and-error methods of the past, with their unguided, independent and inefficient ‘naturally discover’ methods, forces students to rely on fend-for-yourself approaches. Such approaches are most harmful to less-academic students, according to the research. Teachers often make the mistake of assuming that students learned informational science reading strategies in elementary school.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 429.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anderson, R. C. (1972). How to construct achievement tests to assess comprehension. Review of Educational Research, 42, 145–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonner, J. E., & Holliday, W. G. (2006). How college science students engage in note-taking strategies. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43, 786–818.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holliday, W. G. (2004). Choosing science textbooks: Connecting research to common sense. In E. W. Saul (Ed.), Crossing borders in literacy and science instruction: Perspectives on theory and practice (pp. 383–394). Newark, DE: International Reading Association and Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holliday, W. G. (2005). A balanced approach to science inquiry teaching. In N. G. Lederman & L. B. Flick (Eds.), Scientific inquiry and nature of science: Implications for teaching, learning, and teacher education (pp. 201–217). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jetton, T. L., & Dole, J. A. (2004). Adolescent literacy research and practice. New York: The Guildford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kratzig, G. P., & Arbuthnott, K. D. (2006). Perceptual learning and learning proficiency: A test of the hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 238–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michaels, S., Shouse, A. W., & Schweingruber, H. A. (2008). Ready, set, science! Putting research to work in K–8 science classrooms. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K–8 (Committee on Science Learning, Kindergarten Through Eighth Grade). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pressley, M. (2006). Reading instruction that works: The case for balanced teaching. New York: The Guildford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • RAND Reading Study Group. (2004). A research agenda for improving reading comprehension. In R. B. Ruddell & N. J. Unrau (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (pp. 720–754). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waterhouse, L. (2006). Multiple intelligences, the Mozart effect, and emotional intelligence: A critical review. Educational Psychologist, 41, 207–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William G. Holliday .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Holliday, W.G., Cain, S.D. (2012). Teaching Science Reading Comprehension: A Realistic, Research-Based Approach. In: Fraser, B., Tobin, K., McRobbie, C. (eds) Second International Handbook of Science Education. Springer International Handbooks of Education, vol 24. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9041-7_90

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics