Abstract
Whole-class discussions have long been the focus of much research. They are a dominant practice in many classrooms and are, potentially, key sites for fostering children’s learning (Barnes, 1976; Cazden, 2001; Edwards & Mercer, 1987; Wells, 1999). In England, we have seen the endorsement of whole-class teaching within educational policy (Department for Education and Employment (DfEE), 1998, 1999, 2001), not only as a pedagogic tool for standards-based educational reform (Reynolds & Muijs, 1999), but also as a means to achieving inclusivity within an increasingly diverse classroom environment. For example, the National Literacy Strategy Framework for Teaching introduced the notion of interactive whole class teaching, stating that it benefits children who need help to access the curriculum for example low attainers, those with special needs or limited fluency in English, by introducing them to challenging work, teaching them skills in a highly supportive context and raising their expectations and self esteem. (DfEE, 1998, p. 96)
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
In England, compulsory education is divided into four key stages: Key stage 1—age 5–7 years, Key stage 2—7–11 years, Key stage 3—11–14 years and Key stage 4—14–16–years. For the majority, Key stages 1 and 2 are covered at primary school, while Key stages 3 and 4 are covered at secondary school.
- 2.
Gee (2001) describes institutional identities as those that refer to one’s position within an institution—for example the status of a teacher or a student is authorised or legitimated by the school system.
References
Ainscow, M., Booth, T., & Dyson, A. (2004). Understanding and developing inclusive practices in schools: A collaborative action research network. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 8(2), 125–140.
Alexander, R. (2000). Culture and pedagogy: International comparisons in primary education. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Argyris, C., & Schon, D. A. (1974). Theory in practice: Increasing professional effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Barnes, D. (1976). From communication to curriculum. London: Penguin Books Ltd.
Barnes, D., & Todd, F. (1995). Communication and learning revisited: Making meaning through talk. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook Publishers Inc.
Benjamin, S. (2002). The micropolitics of inclusive education: An ethnography. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Black, L. (2002). The guided construction of educational inequality: How socially disadvantaged children are marginalised in classroom interactions. Unpublished PhD thesis, Lancaster University.
Black, L. (2004a). Teacher–pupil talk in whole class discussions and processes of social positioning within the primary school classroom. Language and Education, 18(5), 347–414.
Black, L. (2004b). Differential participation in whole class discussions and the construction of marginalised identities. Journal of Educational Enquiry, 5(1), 34–54.
Black, L. (2007). Analysing cultural models in socio-cultural discourse analysis. International Journal of Educational Research, 46(1–2), 20–30.
Boaler, J. (2000). Mathematics from another world: Traditional communities and the alienation of learners. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 18(4), 1–19.
Boaler, J., & Greeno, J. (2000). Identity, agency and knowing in mathematics worlds. In J. Boaler (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on mathematics teaching and learning. Westport: Ablex Publishing.
Boler, M. (1999). Feeling power: Emotions and education. London: Routledge.
Bourne, J. (1994). A question of ability. In J. Bourne (Ed.), Thinking through primary practice (pp. 212–222). London: Routledge.
Cazden, C. (2001). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning. Portsmouth, NH: Greenwood Press.
Chitty, C. (1989). Towards a new education system: The victory of the new right? London: Routledge.
Dadds, M. (2001). The politics of pedagogy. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 7(1), 43–58.
Department for Education and Employment (DfEE). (1998). The national literacy strategy: A framework for teaching. London: HMSO.
Department for Education and Employment (DfEE). (1999). The national numeracy strategy: Framework for teaching mathematics from reception to year 6. London: HMSO.
Department for Education and Employment (DfEE). (2001). The framework for teaching mathematics: Years 7, 8 and 9. Nottingham: DfEE Publications.
Department for Education and Employment (DfEE). (2003). Excellence and enjoyment: A strategy for primary schools. London: Department for Education and Skills.
DfES/QCA. (2003). Speaking, listening, learning: Working with children in key stages 1 and 2. London: Crown Copyright.
Edwards, D., & Mercer, N. (1987). Common knowledge: The development of understanding in the classroom. London: Routledge.
Gee, J. (1996). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses. New York: Routledge Falmer.
Gee, J. (2001). Identity as an analytic lens for research in education. Review of Research in Education, 25, 99–125.
Hodges, D. (1998). Participation as dis-identification with/in a community of practice. Mind, Culture and Activity, 5, 272–290.
Holland, D., Lachicotte, W., Skinner, D., & Cain, C. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. London: Harvard University Press.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lerman, S. (2001). Cultural, discursive psychology: A socio-cultural approach to studying the teaching and learning of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 46, 87–113.
Mercer, N. (1995). The guided construction of knowledge. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Mercer, N. (2000). Words and minds: How we use language to think together. London: Routledge.
Michaels, S., O’Connor, M., Hall, M., & Resnick, L. (2002). Accountable talk: Classroom conversation that works (E-book from CD-ROM Series). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh.
Renshaw, P. (2003). Community and learning: Contradictions, dilemmas and prospects. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 24(3), 355–370.
Reynolds, D., & Muijs, D. (1999). The effective teaching of mathematics: A review of research. School Leadership and Management, 19(3), 273–288.
Solomon, Y. (1998). Teaching mathematics: Ritual, principle and practice. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 32, 377–390.
Solomon, Y. (2008). Mathematical literacy: Developing identities of inclusion. London: Routledge.
Thompson, E. P. (1980). The making of the english working class. New York: Penguin Books.
Wells, G. (1992). The centrality of talk in education. In K. Norman (Ed.), Thinking voices: The work of the National Oracy Project. London: Hodder & Stoughton.
Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic inquiry: Towards a socio-cultural practice and theory of education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wells, G., & Ball, T. (2008). Exploratory talk and dialogic inquiry. In N. Mercer & S. Hodgkinson (Eds.), Exploring talk in school. London: Sage.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wood, D. (1992). Teaching talk. In K. Norman (Ed.), Thinking voices: The work of the National Oracy Project. London: Hodder & Stoughton.
Zevenbergen, R. (2000). Cracking the code of mathematics classrooms: School success as a function of linguistic, social and cultural background. In J. Boaler (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on mathematics teaching and learning. Westport: Ablex Publishing.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Black, L. (2011). ‘She’s Not in My Head or in My Body’: Developing Identities of Exclusion and Inclusion in Whole-Class Discussions. In: Wyatt-Smith, C., Elkins, J., Gunn, S. (eds) Multiple Perspectives on Difficulties in Learning Literacy and Numeracy. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8864-3_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8864-3_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-8863-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-8864-3
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)