Skip to main content

‘She’s Not in My Head or in My Body’: Developing Identities of Exclusion and Inclusion in Whole-Class Discussions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Multiple Perspectives on Difficulties in Learning Literacy and Numeracy

Abstract

Whole-class discussions have long been the focus of much research. They are a dominant practice in many classrooms and are, potentially, key sites for fostering children’s learning (Barnes, 1976; Cazden, 2001; Edwards & Mercer, 1987; Wells, 1999). In England, we have seen the endorsement of whole-class teaching within educational policy (Department for Education and Employment (DfEE), 1998, 1999, 2001), not only as a pedagogic tool for standards-based educational reform (Reynolds & Muijs, 1999), but also as a means to achieving inclusivity within an increasingly diverse classroom environment. For example, the National Literacy Strategy Framework for Teaching introduced the notion of interactive whole class teaching, stating that it benefits children who need help to access the curriculum for example low attainers, those with special needs or limited fluency in English, by introducing them to challenging work, teaching them skills in a highly supportive context and raising their expectations and self esteem. (DfEE, 1998, p. 96)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In England, compulsory education is divided into four key stages: Key stage 1—age 5–7 years, Key stage 2—7–11 years, Key stage 3—11–14 years and Key stage 4—14–16–years. For the majority, Key stages 1 and 2 are covered at primary school, while Key stages 3 and 4 are covered at secondary school.

  2. 2.

    Gee (2001) describes institutional identities as those that refer to one’s position within an institution—for example the status of a teacher or a student is authorised or legitimated by the school system.

References

  • Ainscow, M., Booth, T., & Dyson, A. (2004). Understanding and developing inclusive practices in schools: A collaborative action research network. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 8(2), 125–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, R. (2000). Culture and pedagogy: International comparisons in primary education. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C., & Schon, D. A. (1974). Theory in practice: Increasing professional effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, D. (1976). From communication to curriculum. London: Penguin Books Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, D., & Todd, F. (1995). Communication and learning revisited: Making meaning through talk. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook Publishers Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, S. (2002). The micropolitics of inclusive education: An ethnography. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, L. (2002). The guided construction of educational inequality: How socially disadvantaged children are marginalised in classroom interactions. Unpublished PhD thesis, Lancaster University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, L. (2004a). Teacher–pupil talk in whole class discussions and processes of social positioning within the primary school classroom. Language and Education, 18(5), 347–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, L. (2004b). Differential participation in whole class discussions and the construction of marginalised identities. Journal of Educational Enquiry, 5(1), 34–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, L. (2007). Analysing cultural models in socio-cultural discourse analysis. International Journal of Educational Research, 46(1–2), 20–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boaler, J. (2000). Mathematics from another world: Traditional communities and the alienation of learners. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 18(4), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boaler, J., & Greeno, J. (2000). Identity, agency and knowing in mathematics worlds. In J. Boaler (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on mathematics teaching and learning. Westport: Ablex Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boler, M. (1999). Feeling power: Emotions and education. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourne, J. (1994). A question of ability. In J. Bourne (Ed.), Thinking through primary practice (pp. 212–222). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cazden, C. (2001). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning. Portsmouth, NH: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chitty, C. (1989). Towards a new education system: The victory of the new right? London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dadds, M. (2001). The politics of pedagogy. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 7(1), 43–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Education and Employment (DfEE). (1998). The national literacy strategy: A framework for teaching. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Education and Employment (DfEE). (1999). The national numeracy strategy: Framework for teaching mathematics from reception to year 6. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Education and Employment (DfEE). (2001). The framework for teaching mathematics: Years 7, 8 and 9. Nottingham: DfEE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Education and Employment (DfEE). (2003). Excellence and enjoyment: A strategy for primary schools. London: Department for Education and Skills.

    Google Scholar 

  • DfES/QCA. (2003). Speaking, listening, learning: Working with children in key stages 1 and 2. London: Crown Copyright.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, D., & Mercer, N. (1987). Common knowledge: The development of understanding in the classroom. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J. (1996). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses. New York: Routledge Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J. (2001). Identity as an analytic lens for research in education. Review of Research in Education, 25, 99–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodges, D. (1998). Participation as dis-identification with/in a community of practice. Mind, Culture and Activity, 5, 272–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holland, D., Lachicotte, W., Skinner, D., & Cain, C. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. London: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerman, S. (2001). Cultural, discursive psychology: A socio-cultural approach to studying the teaching and learning of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 46, 87–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, N. (1995). The guided construction of knowledge. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, N. (2000). Words and minds: How we use language to think together. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Michaels, S., O’Connor, M., Hall, M., & Resnick, L. (2002). Accountable talk: Classroom conversation that works (E-book from CD-ROM Series). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renshaw, P. (2003). Community and learning: Contradictions, dilemmas and prospects. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 24(3), 355–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, D., & Muijs, D. (1999). The effective teaching of mathematics: A review of research. School Leadership and Management, 19(3), 273–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, Y. (1998). Teaching mathematics: Ritual, principle and practice. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 32, 377–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, Y. (2008). Mathematical literacy: Developing identities of inclusion. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, E. P. (1980). The making of the english working class. New York: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, G. (1992). The centrality of talk in education. In K. Norman (Ed.), Thinking voices: The work of the National Oracy Project. London: Hodder & Stoughton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic inquiry: Towards a socio-cultural practice and theory of education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wells, G., & Ball, T. (2008). Exploratory talk and dialogic inquiry. In N. Mercer & S. Hodgkinson (Eds.), Exploring talk in school. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D. (1992). Teaching talk. In K. Norman (Ed.), Thinking voices: The work of the National Oracy Project. London: Hodder & Stoughton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zevenbergen, R. (2000). Cracking the code of mathematics classrooms: School success as a function of linguistic, social and cultural background. In J. Boaler (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on mathematics teaching and learning. Westport: Ablex Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laura Black .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Black, L. (2011). ‘She’s Not in My Head or in My Body’: Developing Identities of Exclusion and Inclusion in Whole-Class Discussions. In: Wyatt-Smith, C., Elkins, J., Gunn, S. (eds) Multiple Perspectives on Difficulties in Learning Literacy and Numeracy. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8864-3_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics