Skip to main content

Alien Invertebrates and Fish in European Inland Waters

  • Chapter
Handbook of Alien Species in Europe

It seems axiomatic that rivers, lakes, freshwater marshes, and other inland wetlands have an infinite value to humankind. They contribute for 20% (about US$6.6 trillion) to the estimated annual global value of the entire biosphere (Costanza et al. 1997). High-quality water has also become a strategic factor that allows for the viability and development of an increasing number of countries affected by both climate change and rising water-demand. All this justifies the current concern about the degradation of freshwater systems leading to rapid extinctions of organisms — in some cases even matching the declines recorded in tropical forests (Ricciardi and Rasmussen 1999).

There is general consensus today that some alien species will continue to be major drivers of degradation and loss of aquatic systems (Sala et al. 2000; Millennium Ecosystem Assessment 2005). The vulnerability of inland waters to bioinvasions is due to several factors (Gherardi 2007a), including the higher intrinsic dispersal ability of freshwater species compared with terrestrial organisms (Beisel 2001) and the strong impact of both human disturbance (Ross et al. 2001) and altered seasonal temperature regimes (Eaton and Scheller 1996). Species introduction into inland waters is associated with the intensity with which humans utilise these systems for recreation, food sources, and commerce (Rahel 2000), being a direct consequence of economic activity and trade globalisation that benefit millions worldwide (Lodge and Shrader-Frechette 2003). This situation has generated a conflict between two often competing goals — increasing economic activity and protecting the environment, which makes it difficult to decision-makers to develop policies aimed at containing the spread of aliens and mitigating the ecological risks they pose (Gherardi 2007a).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alexandrov B, Boltachev A, Kharchenko T, Lyashenko A, Son M, Tsarenko P, Zhukinsky V (2007) Trends of aquatic species invasions in Ukraine. Aquat Invasions 2:215–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Bănărescu P (1964) Pisces — Osteichthyes. Fauna Republicii Populare Romîne. Vol. XIII. Ed Acad Rep Pop Rom, Bucureti

    Google Scholar 

  • Beisel J-N (2001) The elusive model of a biological invasion process: time to take differences among aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems into account? Ethol Ecol Evol 13:193–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Bianco PG (1998) Freshwater fish transfers in Italy: history, local modification of fish composition, and a prediction on the future of native populations. In: Cowx IJ (ed) Stocking and introductions of fishes. Blackwell, Oxford. 165–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Bij de Vaate A, Jązdžewski K, Ketelaars HAM, Gollasch S, Van der Velde G (2002) Geographical patterns in range extension of Ponto-Caspian macroinvertebrate species in Europe. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 59:1159–1174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Britton JR, Davies JM (2006) First record of the white catfish Ameiurus catus in Great Britain.J Fish Biol 69:1236–1238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Britton JR, Davies JM (2007) First U.K. recording in the wild of the bighead carp Hypophthalmichthys nobilis. J Fish Biol 70:1280–1282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cianfanelli S, Lori E, Bodon M (2007) Alien freshwater molluscs in Italy and their distribution.In: Gherardi F (ed) Biological invaders in inland waters: profiles, distribution, and threats.Springer, Dordrecht. 103–121

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Clavero M, García-Berthou E (2006) Homogenization dynamics and introduction routes of invasive freshwater fish in the Iberian Peninsula. Ecol Appl 16:2313–2324

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Colautti RI, MacIsaac HJ (2004) A neutral terminology to define ‘invasive#x2019; species. Diversity Distrib 10:135–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Copp GH, Fox MG, Kováč V (2002) Growth, morphology and life history traits of a coolwater European population of pumpkinseed Lepomis gibbosus. Arch Hydrobiol 155:585–614

    Google Scholar 

  • Copp GH, Bianco PG, Bogutskaya NG, Erós T, Falka I, Ferreira MT, Fox MG, Freyhof J, Gozlan RE, Grabowska J, Kováč V, Moreno-Amich R, Naseka AM, Peňáz M, Povž M, Przybylski M,Robillard M, Russell IC, Stakėnas S, Šumer S, Vila-Gispert A, Wiesner C (2005) To be, or not to be, a non-native freshwater fish? J Appl Ichthyol 21:242–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Copp GH, Templeton M, Gozlan RE (2007) Propagule pressure and the invasion risks of non-native freshwater fishes: a case study in England. J Fish Biol 71 (Suppl D):1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Costanza R, d'Arge R, de Groot R, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Limburg K, Naeem S, O'NeillRV, Paruelo J, Raskin RG, Sutton P, van den Belt M (1997) The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387:253–260

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Devin S, Bollache L, Noël PN, Beisel J-N (2005) Patterns of biological invasions in French freshwater systems by non-indigenous macroinvertebrates. Hydrobiologia 551:137–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dick JTA, Platvoet D (2000) Invading predatory crustacean Dikerogammarus villosus eliminates both native and exotic species. Proc R Soc Lond 267:977–983

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eaton JG, Scheller RM (1996) Effects of climatic warming on fish thermal habitat in streams of the United States. Limnol Ocean 41:110–1115

    Google Scholar 

  • Elton CS (1958) The ecology of invasions by animals and plants. Methuen, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Elvira B, Almodóvar A (2001) Freshwater fish introductions in Spain: facts and figures at the beginning of the 21st century. J Fish Biol 59:323–331

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewel JJ, O'Dowd DJ, Bergelson J, Daehler CC, D'Antonio CM, Gomez D, Gordon DR, Hobbs RJ, Holt A, Hopper KR, Hughes CE, Lahart M, Leakey RRB, Lee WG, Loope LL, Lorence DH, Louda SM, Lugo AE, Mcevoy PB, Richardson DM, Vitousek PM (1999) Deliberate introductions of species: research needs. Bioscience 49:619–630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galil BS, Nehring S, Panov VE (2007) Waterways as invasion highways: impact of climate change and globalization. In: Nentwig W (ed) Biological invasions. Ecological Studies 193, Springer,Berlin. 59–74

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • García-Berthou E, Moreno-Amich R (2000) Introduction of exotic fish into a Mediterranean lake over a 90-year period. Arch Hydrobiol 149:271–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Gherardi F (2006) Crayfish invading Europe: the case study of Procambarus clarkii. Mar Fresh Behav Physiol 39:175–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gherardi F (2007a) The impact of freshwater NIS: what are we missing? In: Gherardi F (ed) Biological invaders in inland waters: profiles, distribution, and threats. Springer, Dordrecht. 437–462

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gherardi F (2007b) Biological invasions in inland waters: an overview. In: Gherardi F (ed) Biological invaders in inland waters: profiles, distribution, and threats. Springer, Dordrecht 3–25

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gherardi F (2007c) Understanding the impact of invasive crayfish. In: Gherardi F (ed) Biological invaders in inland waters: profiles, distribution, and threats. Springer, Dordrecht.507–542

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Godinho FN, Ferreira MT, Portugal e Castro MI (1998) Fish assemblage composition in relation to environmental gradients in Portuguese reservoirs. Aquat Living Resour 11:325–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gollasch S (2007) Marine vs. freshwater invaders: Is shipping the key vector for species introductions to Europe? In: Gherardi F (ed) Biological invaders in inland waters: profiles, distribution, and threats. Springer, Dordrecht. 339–345

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gollasch S, Nehring S (2006) National checklist for aquatic alien species in Germany. Aquat Invasions 1:245–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gozlan RE, St Hilaire S, Feist SW, Martin P, Kent ML (2005) Disease threat to European fish.Nature 435:1046

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hänfling B, Bolton P, Harley M, Carvalho GR (2005) A molecular approach to detect hybridisation between crucian carp (Carassius carassius) and non-indigenous carp species (Carassius spp. and Cyprinus carpio). Freshwater Biol 50:403–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jązdžewski K (1980) Range extensions of some gammaridean species in European inland waters caused by human activity. Crustaceana Suppl 6:84–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Jerscke JM, Strayer DL (2005) Invasion success of vertebrates in Europe and North America. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:7198–7202

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Karatayev AY, Burlakova LE, Padilla DK (1997) The effects of Dreissena polymorpha (Pallas) invasion on aquatic communities in eastern Europe. J Shellfish Res 16:187–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Karpevich AF (1975) Teorija i praktika akklimatizacii vodnykh vodoemov. Pishchevaya Promyshlennost, Moskva

    Google Scholar 

  • Ketelaars HAM (2004) Range extensions of Ponto-Caspian aquatic invertebrates in continental Europe. In: Dumont HJ, Shiganova TA, Niermann U (eds) Aquatic invasions in the Black,Caspian, and Mediterranean seas. Kluwer, Dordrecht. 209–236

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kirk RS (2003) The impact of Anguillicola crassus on European eels. Fish Manage Ecol 10:385–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Künstler J (1908) Ameiurus nebulosus et Eupomotis gibbosus. Bull Soc Acclimatation 238–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Lever C (1977) The naturalised animals of the British Isles. Hutchinson, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Linnaeus C (1746) Fauna Suecica. Salvius, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  • Lodge DM, Shrader-Frechette K (2003) Nonindigenous species: ecological explanation, environmental ethics, and public policy. Conserv Biol 17:31–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacIsaac HJ, Grigorovich IA, Ricciardi A (2001) Reassessment of species invasion concepts: the Great Lakes basin as a model. Biol Invasions 3:405–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKinney ML, Lockwood JL (1999) Biotic homogenization: a few winners replacing many losers in the next mass extinction. Trends Ecol Evol 14:450–453

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystem and human well-being: biodiversity synthesis. World Resources Institute, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyle PB, Li HW, Barton BA (1986) The Frankenstein effect: impact of introduced fishes on native fishes in North America. In: Strond RH (ed) Fish culture in fisheries management.American Fisheries Societies, Bethesda

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyström P (1999) Ecological impact of introduced and native crayfish on freshwater communities: European perspectives. In: Gherardi F, Holdich DM (eds) Crayfish in Europe as alien species: How to make the best of a bad situation? Balkema, Rotterdam. 63–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyström P, Svensson O, Lardner B, Brönmark C, Granéli W (2001) The influence of multiple introduced predators on a littoral pond community. Ecology 82:1023–1039

    Google Scholar 

  • Panov VE, Dgebuadze YY, Shiganova TA, Filippov AA, Minchin D (2007a) A risk assessment of biological invasions in the inland waterways of Europe: the northern invasion corridor case study. In: Gherardi F (ed) Biological invaders in inland waters: profiles, distribution, and threats. Springer, Dordrecht. 639–659

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Panov VE, Rodionova NV, Bolshagin PV, Bychek EA (2007b) Invasion biology of Ponto-Caspian onychopod cladocerans (Crustacea: Cladocera: Onychopoda). Hydrobiologia 590:3–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker IM, Simberloff D, Lonsdale WM, Goodell K, Wonham M, Kareiva PM, Williamson MH,Von Holle B, Moyle PB, Byers JE, Goldwasser L (1999) Impact: toward a framework for understanding the ecological effects of invaders. Biol Invasions 1:3–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pontoppidan E (1775) The natural history of Norway. Linde, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Povž M, Šumer S (2005) A brief review of non-native freshwater fishes in Slovenia. J Appl Ichthyol 21:316–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahel FJ (2000) Homogenization of fish faunas across the United States. Science 288:854–856

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ricciardi A, Rasmussen JB (1999) Extinction rates of North American freshwater fauna. Conserv Biol 13:1220–1222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross RM, Lellis WA, Bennett RM, Johnson CS (2001) Landscape determinants of nonindigenous fish invasions. Biol Invasions 3:347–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sala OE, Chapin FS III, Armesto JJ, Berlow E, Bloomfield J, Dirzo R, Huber-Sannwald E,Huenneke L, Jackson RB, Kinzig A, Leemans R, Lodge DM, Mooney HA, Oesterheld M, Poff NL, Sykes MT, Walker BH, Walker M, Wall DH (2000) Biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science 287:1770–1774

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff D (2003) How much information on population biology is needed to manage introduced species? Conserv Biol 17:83–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Souty-Grosset C, Holdich DM, Noël P Y, Reynolds JD, Haffner P (2006) Atlas of crayfish in Europe. Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Strayer DL, Eviner VT, Jeschke JM, Pace ML (2006) Understanding the long-term effects of species invasions. Trends Ecol Evol 21:645–651

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tittizer T (1996) Vorkommen und Ausbreitung aquatischer Neozoen (Makrozoobenthos) in den Bundeswasserstrassen. In Gebietsfremde Tierarten. Auswirkungen auf einheimischen Arten,Lebensgemeinschaften und Biotope. Situationsanalyse. In: Gebhardt H, Kinzelbach R, Schmidt-Fischer S (eds) Umweltministerium Baden Württemberg. Ecomed, Landsberg. 49–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Welcomme RL (1988) International introductions of inland aquatic species. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper 294. FAO, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Westman K (1973) The population of the crayfish Astacus astacus in Finland and the introduction of the American crayfish Pacifastacus leniusculus Dana. Freshwater Crayfish 1:41–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkins NP (1989) Ponds, passes and parcs: aquaculture in Victorian Ireland. Glendale Publishers,Northdale

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson M (1996) Biological invasions. Chapman & Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science + Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gherardi, F., Gollasch, S., Minchin, D., Olenin, S., Panov, V.E. (2009). Alien Invertebrates and Fish in European Inland Waters. In: Handbook of Alien Species in Europe. Invading Nature - Springer Series in Invasion Ecology, vol 3. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8280-1_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics