Abstract
The point, or points, at which a ‘self-study’ might become ‘research’ is a matter of some discomfort and ‘dissensus’ even among those who work and write in the self-study of teaching and teacher education areas. Those of us in the practitioner research, teacher researcher, action research and self-study in teacher education communities all forage somewhat nervously in the swamplands between the apparently infertile deserts of positivist detachment and the impenetrable jungles of postmodern de/con/structive self-inspection. In our interests we straddle precariously a perceived chasm between the high theory of academe and the rich chaos of situated practice, and in so doing, we often buy into, at the same time as resenting, an unhelpful binarism that opposes rather than reconciles the university to the school, theory to practice, the academic to the teacher and, the researcher to the practitioner.
Taking a scenario of a rejected research proposal as its starting point, this chapter addresses these issues in relation to three core questions: by what criteria do teacher-researchers judge their studies to be research?; how might the epistemological issues of self involvement be resolved?; and, how is self-study in teaching and teacher education situated in the political discourse of the academy?
We conclude that establishing an epistemological warrant for self-study as research is still largely an enterprise conceptualized within, and judged against, the contested but nevertheless conventional requirements of the academy. It also seems that the exercise is made particularly problematic because any such research discourse is embedded in the political context of an academy that continues to privilege ‘outsider’ research approaches at the same time as it struggles to accommodate to the unique position of teaching and teacher education as simultaneously the thing we know about, the thing we do and the thing we research.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Alcorn, N. (1999). Initial teacher education since 1990: Funding and supply as determinants of policy and practice. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 34(1), 110–120.
Allender, J. S. (2001). Teacher self: The practice of humanistic education. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman and Littlefield.
Alrichter, H., Posch, P., & Somekh, B. (1993). Teachers investigate their work: An introduction to the methods of action research. London: Routledge.
Bass, L., Anderson-Patton, V., & Allender, J. (2002). Self-study as a way of teaching and learning: A research collaborative re-analysis of self-study teaching portfolios. In John Loughran & Tom Russell (Eds.), ImprOffing teacher education practices through self-study (pp. 56–70). London: RoutledgeFalmer.
Bell, J. (1993). Doing your research project: A guide for first time researchers in education and social science (2nd Edn.). Buckingham: Open University Press.
Berry, A., & Loughan, J. J. (2002). Developing an understanding of learning to teach in teacher education. In John Loughran & Tom Russell (Eds.), ImprOffing teacher education practices through self-study (pp. 13–29). London: RoutledgeFalmer.
Boyd, S., & Chalmers, A. (2001). Making connections: educators’ use of research to inform their practice: Final report. Wellington: NZCER.
Boyer, E. L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Bullough, R., & Pinnegar, S. (2001). Guidelines for quality in autobiographical forms of self-study research. Educational Researcher, 30(3), 13–21.
Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming critical: Education, knowledge and action research. Lewes: Falmer Press.
Carspecken, P. (1996). Critical ethnography in educational research: A theoretical and practical guide. New York: Routledge.
Clarke, A. (2001). The recent landscape of teacher education: critical points and possible conjectures. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(5), 599–611.
Clifford, G. J., & Guthrie, J. W. (1988). Ed school: A brief for professional education. Chicago, Illonois: University of Chicago Press.
Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (1990). Research on teaching and teacher research: The issues that divide. Educational Researcher, 19(2), 2–11.
Codd, J. (1999). Educational reform, accountability and the culture of distrust. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 34(1), 45–53.
Cole, A. L. (2000). Academic freedom and the publish or perish paradox in schools of education. Teacher Education Quarterly, 27(2), 33–48.
Cole, A. L., & Knowles, J. G. (1996). The Politics of Epistemology and the Self-Study of Teacher Education Practices. In J. Richards, & T. Russell (Eds.), Empowering our future in Teacher Education. Proceedings of the First International Conference of the Self-Study of Teacher Education Practices, (67–73). Herstmonceux Castle, East Sussex, England. Kingston, Ontario: Queen’s University.
Cole, A., & Knowles, G. (2000). Researching teaching: Exploring teacher development through reflexive inquiry. Needham Heights: Allyn & Bacon.
Conle, C., Louden, W., & Mildon, D. (1998). Tensions and intentions in group inquiry: A joint self-study. In M. L. Hamilton, S. Pinnegar, T. Russell, J. Loughran & V. LaBoskey (Eds.), Reconceptu-alizing teaching practice: Self-study in teacher education (pp. 178–194). London: Falmer Press.
Cresswell, J. W. (2002). Educational research: Planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Upper saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice-Hall.
Dadds, M., & Hart, S. (2001). InnOffation and quality in practitioner research. In Marion Dadds & Susan Hart (Eds.), Doing practitioner research differently (pp. 143–159). London and New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
Department of Education, Training and Youth A3airs, Higher Education Division (2000). The Impact of educational research: Research evaluation program. Canberra: DETYA.
Department of Education. (1988). Administering for excellence: Effective administration in education (Picot Report). Wellington: GOffernment Printer.
Ducharme, E. R. D., & Ducharme, M. K. (1996). Development of the teacher education professoriate. In F. B. Murray (Ed.), The teacher educator’s handbook: building a knowledge base for the preparation of teachers (pp. 691–714). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Edith Cowan University. (2001). Definition of research. Retrieved August, 2002 from http://www. cowan.edu.au/research/web2002/definition-research.html
Eisner, E. (1998). The enlightened eye: Qualitative enquiry and the enhancement of educational practice. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Elliot, J. (1991). Action research for educational change. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Fenstermacher, G. (1994). The knower and the known: The nature of knowledge in research on teaching. In L. Darling-Hammond (Ed.), Review of research in education, 20, 3–56. Washington, D.C.: AERA.
Fenstermacher, G. D., & Sanger, M. (1998). What is the significance of John Dewey’s approach to the problem of knowledge? The Elementary School Journal, 98(5), 467–478.
Florio-Ruane, S. (2002). More light: An argument for complexity in studies of teaching and teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(3), 205–215.
Glassick, C. E. (2002). The four scholarships. HERDSA News 24(1), 1–3.
Glassick, C. E., Huber, M. T., & Maeroff, G. I. (1997). Scholarship assessed: Evaluation of the professoriate. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Goodlad, J. I. (2002). Teacher education research: The outside and the inside. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(3), 216–221.
Graue, E., & Grant, C. (2002). Questions, calls and conversations for researcher in teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(3), 268–272.
Guba, E. (1990). Subjectivity and objectivity. In E. Eisner & A. Peshkin (Eds.), Qualitative enquiry in education: The continuing debate (pp.74–91). New York: Teachers College Press.
Hammersley, M. (1992). What’s wrong with ethnography? London: Routledge.
Hammersley, M. (1993a). On the teacher as researcher. In M. Hammersley (Ed.), Educational research: Current issues, Volume 1 (pp. 211–231). Buckingham: Open University Press.
Hammersley, M. (1993b). On practitioner ethnography. In M. Hammersley (Ed.), ContrOffersies in classroom research. Second Edition (pp. 246–264). Buckingham. Open University Press.
Hammersley, M. (1995). The politics of social research. London: Sage.
Hamilton, M. L. (2002). Change, social justice, and reliability: Reflections of a secret (change) agent. In John Loughran & Tom Russell (Eds.), ImprOffing teacher education practices through self-study (pp. 176–189). London: RoutledgeFalmer.
Hodgkinson J. L. (1957). Action research: A critique. Journal of Educational Sociology, 31(4), 137–153.
Huberman, M. (1996). Moving mainstream: taking a closer look at teacher research. Language Arts, 73(2), 124–140.
Husen, T. (1997). Research paradigms in education. In J. P. Keeves (Ed.), Educational research, methodology, and measurement: An international handbook (pp. 16–21). Oxford: Elsevier Science Ltd.
Hutchings, P., & Shulman, L. (1999). The scholarship of teaching: New elaborations, new developments. Change, 31(5), 10–15.
Hycner, R. (1985). Some guidelines for the phenomenological analysis of interview data. Human Studies, 8(3), 279–303.
Kane, R. G. (2002). How we teach the teachers: new ways to theorize practice and practice theory. Prospects, UNESCO, Paris, 32(3), 348–363.
Kemmis, S. (1993). Action research. In M. Hammersley (Ed.), Educational research: Current issues (pp. 177–190). Buckingham: Open University Press.
Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (1988). The action research planner, (2nd Edition). Victoria, Australia: Deakin University Press.
Korthagen, F. A. J., with Kessels, B., Koster, B., Lagerwerf, B., & Wubbels, T. (2001). Linking practice and theory: The pedagogy of realistic teacher education. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Kuzmic, J. J. (2002). Research as a way of knowing and seeing: Advocacy for the other. In John Loughran & Tom Russell (Eds.), ImprOffing teacher education practices through self-study (pp. 222–236). London: RoutledgeFalmer.
Labrie, A., Brdarevic, V., & Russell, T. (2000). Shared reflections on professional practices: Teaching and learning in a preservice physics method course, Reflective Practice, 1(2), 233–247.
Lanier, J. E., & Little, J. W. (1986). Research in teacher education. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd Ed.) (pp. 528–569). New York: McMillan.
Lather, P. (1986). Issues of validity in openly ideologic research: Between a rock and a soft place. Interchange, 17(4), 63–84.
Lee, O., & Yarger, S. J. (1996). Modes of inquiry in research on teacher education. In J. Sikula, T. Buttery, & E. Guyton (Eds.), Handbook of teacher education (pp. 14–37). Association of Teacher Educators.
Loughran, J. J., & Northfield, J. (1998). A framework for the development of self-study practice. In M. Hamilton, S. Pinnegar, T. Russell, J. Loughran & V. LaBoskey (Eds.), Reconceptualizing teaching practice: Self-study in teacher education (pp. 7–18). London: Falmer Press.
Louie, B., Stackman, R., Drevdahl, D., & Purdy, J. (2002). Myths about teaching and the university professor: the power of unexamined beliefs. In John Loughran & Tom Russell (Eds.), ImprOffing teacher education practices through self-study (pp. 193–207). London: RoutledgeFalmer.
McNiff, J., Lomax, P., & Whitehead, J. (1996). You and your action research project. London: Routledge.
McTaggart, R. (1991). Action research: A short modern history. Australia: Deakin University Press.
Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Mills, G. (2003). Action research. A guide for the teacher researcher (2nd Edition). Upper Saddle River, NJ. Merrill Prentice Hall.
Mills, C. W. (1959). The sociological imagination. New York. Oxford University Press.
Montecinos, C., Cnudde, V., Ow, M., Soli ’s, M. C., Suzuki, E., & Riveros, M. (2002). Relearning the meaning and practice of student teaching supervision through collaborative self-study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(7), 781–793.
Muchmore, J., & Sayre, E. (2002). Educating grace: A self-study of two teacher edcuators’ attitudes, beliefs and decision-making regarding the home schooling of their daughter. In, A. Samaras, C. Kosnik & A. Freese (Eds.), Making a Difference in Teacher Education Through Self-Study. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Self-Study of Teacher Education Practices, (Volume 2, pp. 54–56). East Sussex, England. Toronto, Ontario: OISE, University of Toronto.
Munby, H., & Russell, T. (1995). Towards rigour with relevance: how can teachers and teacher educators claim to know? In Tom Russell & Fred Korthagen (Eds.), Teachers who teach teachers: reflections on teacher education (pp. 172–184). London: Falmer Press.
Murray, L. (2000). Practitioner-based enquiry: Principles for postgraduate research. London: Falmer Press.
National Research Foundation. (2002). Guide to research support 2002, Retrieved in August 2002 from http://www.nrf.ac.za/funding/guide/evalrating.stm#research
Neuman, W. (1997). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (3rd Edition). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Neville, M. (1999). Reflecting on university teaching practices. In A. Chen & J. Van Maanen (Eds.), The reflective spin: Case studies of teachers in higher education transforming action (pp. 225–235). Singapore: World Scientific.
New Zealand Qualifications Authority. (1995). Quality assurance for degrees and related qualifications. Wellington: NZQA.
Noffke, S. (1995). Action research and democratic schooling: problems and potentials. In S. Noffke & R. Stevenson (Eds.), Educational action research: Becoming practically critical (pp. 1–12). New York: Teachers College Press.
Oda, L. K. (1998). Harmony, conflict and respect: An Asian-American educator’s self-study. In M. Hamilton, S. Pinnegar, T. Russell, J. Loughran & V. LaBoskey (Eds.), Reconceptualizing teaching practice: Self-study in teacher education (pp. 113–123). London: Falmer Press.
Openshaw, R. (1996). Between two worlds: A history of Palmerston North college of education 1956–1996. Palmerston North: Dunmore Press.
Openshaw, R. (1999). Forward to the past in New Zealand teacher education. Journal of Education for Teaching, 25(2), 111–122.
Passey, D., & Samways, B. (Eds.) (1997). Information technology: Supporting change through teacher education. London: Chapman & Hall.
Patterson, L., & Shannon, P. (1993). Reflection, inquiry, action. In L. Patterson et al. (Eds.), Teachers are researchers: Reflection and action (pp. 7–11). USA: International Reading Association.
Pring, R. (1999). Reflecting on the reflective practitioner. In A. Chen & J. Van Maanan (Eds.), The reflective spin: Case studies of teachers in higher education transforming action (pp.3–13). Singapore: World Scientific.
Reason, P. (1994). Three approaches to participative inquiry. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 324–339). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Reason, P., & Rowan, J. (1981). Issues of validity in new paradigm research. In Reason & Rowan (Eds.), A sourcebook of new paradigm research (pp. 239–262). New York: John Wiley.
Richardson, V. (1994). Conducting research on practice. Educational Researcher, 23(5), 5–10.
Robinson, V. (1993). Problem-based methodology: Research for the improvement of practice. Oxford: Pergamon.
Roth, W., & Tobin. K. (2002). At the elbow of another: Learning to teach by coteaching. New York. Peter Lang Publishing.
Russell, T. (2002). Guiding new teachers’ learning from classroom experience: self-study of the faculty liaison role. In John Loughran & Tom Russell (Eds.), ImprOffing teacher education practices through self-study (pp. 73–87). London: RoutledgeFalmer.
Samaras, A. (2002). Self-study for teacher educators: Crafting a pedagogy for educational change. New York: Peter Lang.
Schmier, L. (1999). Confession of a recOffering classroom talking addict. In A. Chen & J. Van Maanen (Eds.), The reflective spin: Case studies of teachers in higher education transforming action (pp. 69–80). Singapore: World Scientific.
Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. USA: Basic Books.
Schön, D. A. (1995). Knowing-in-action: The new scholarship requires a new epistemology, Change, 27(6), 27–34.
Sears, J. (1992). Researching the other/searching for self: Qualitative research on [homo]sexuality in education. Theory Into Practice, xxxi(2), 147–156.
Shulman, L. S. (2002). Truth and consequences: Inquiry and policy in research on teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(3), 248–253.
Smith, H. (1998). Self-study and the development of collective knowledge. In M. Hamilton, S. Pinnegar, T. Russell, J. Loughran & V. LaBoskey (Eds.), Reconceptualizing teaching practice: Self-study in teacher education (pp. 19–29). London: Falmer Press.
Snow, C. E. (2001). Knowing what we know: Children, teachers, researchers. Educational Researcher, 30(7), 3–9.
Somekh, B., & Davis, N. (Eds.) (1997). Using information technology Effectively in teaching and learning. London: Routledge.
Stake, R. (1995). The art of case study research. London: Sage.
Stake, R. (2000). Case studies. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd Edn.) (pp. 435–454). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Stenhouse, L. (1981). What counts as research? British Journal of Educational Studies, 29(2), 103–113.
Stronach, I., & MacLure, M. (1997). Un/doing educational research: Engagements with the postmodern. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Tidwell, D. (2002). A balancing act: Self-study in valuing the individual student. In John Loughran & Tom Russell (Eds.), ImprOffing teacher education practices through self-study (pp. 30–42). London: RoutledgeFalmer.
Tierney, W., & Lincoln, Y. (1997). Introduction: explorations and discOfferies. In W. Tierney & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Representation and the text: Re-framing the narrative voice (pp. vii–xvi). NY: State University of New York Press.
Trifonis, P. P. (Ed.) (2000). Revolutionary pedagogies: Cultural politics, instituting education, and the discourse of theory. London: Routledge.
University of Otago. (1997). University of Otago research management Plan 1997–2000. Dunedin: University of Otago.
Van Manen, M. (1990). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. Canada: University of Western Ontario.
Walford, G. (Ed.) (1991). Doing educational research. London: Routledge.
Walker, J. C., & Evers, C. W. (1997). Research in education: Epistemological issues. In J. P. Keeves (Ed.), Educational research, methodology, and measurement: An international handbook, 2nd Ed. (pp. 22–30). Oxford: Elsevier Science Ltd.
Watson, A. (1999). Teacher knowledge and classroom teaching. In A. Chen & J. Van Maanen (Eds.), The reflective spin: Case studies of teachers in higher education transforming action (pp. 81–96). Singapore: World Scientific.
Weinert, F. E. (1997). Translating research into practice. In J. P. Keeves (Ed.), Educational research, methodology, and measurement: An international handbook, 2nd Ed. (pp. 263–268). Oxford: Elsevier Science Ltd.
Whitehead, J. (1994, April). Creating a living educational theory from an analysis of my own educational practices: How do you create and test the validity of your living educational theory? Paper presented at the Annual General Meeting of the American Educational research Association, New Orleans.
Whitehead, J. (1995). Educative relationships with the writing of others. In Tom Russell & Fred Korthagen (Eds.), Teachers who teach teachers: Reflections on teacher education (pp. 113–129). London: Falmer Press.
Wideen, M., Mayer-Smith, J., & Moon, B. (1998). A critical analysis of the research on learning to teach: Making the case for an ecological perspective on inquiry. Review of Educational Research, 68(2), 130–178.
Wilcox, S. (1998). Claiming to understand educational development. In M. L. Hamilton, S. Pinnegar, T. Russell, J. Loughran & V. LaBoskey (Eds.), Reconceptualizing teaching practice: Self-study in teacher education (pp. 67–76). London: Falmer Press.
Williamson-Leadley, S. (2001). Setting up and implementing a class for year 4 to 6 students on the design, evaluation and construction of web pages from a multiple intelligences perspective. Unpublished Masters Dissertation, Christchurch College of Education, New Zealand.
Wolcott, H. F. (2001). Writing up qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA. Sage.
Wong, E. D. (1995). Challenges confronting the researcher/teacher. Educational Researcher, 24(3), 22–8.
Wood, P. (1988). Action research: a field perspective. Journal of Education for Teaching, 14(2), 135–150.
Woods, P. (1996). Researching the art of teaching: Ethnography for educational use. London: Routledge.
Zeichner, K., & Liston, D. (1990). Traditions of reform in teacher education, Journal of teacher Education, 41(2), 3–20.
Zeichner, K. M. (1995). Beyond the divide of teacher research and academic research. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 1(2), 153–172.
Zeichner, K. M. (1999). The new scholarship in teacher education. Educational Researcher, 28(9), 4–15.
Zeichner, K., & Noffke, S. (2001). Practitioner research. In V Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th Edition) (pp. 298–330). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
Zuber-Skerritt, O. (Ed.) (1991). Action research for change and development. Aldershot: Avebury.
Zuber-Skerritt, O. (1996). Introduction: new directions in action research. In O. Zuber-Skerritt (Ed.), New directions in action research (pp. 3–9). London: Falmer Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ham, V., Kane, R. (2004). Finding A Way Through The Swamp: A Case For Self-Study As Research*. In: Loughran, J.J., Hamilton, M.L., LaBoskey, V.K., Russell, T. (eds) International Handbook of Self-Study of Teaching and Teacher Education Practices. Springer International Handbooks of Education, vol 12. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6545-3_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6545-3_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-1812-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-6545-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive