Over the past two decades in Western Europe, the Evaluative State has grown, is growing though whether, like the power of one of Britain's more unfortunate monarchs, George III, ‘it ought to be diminished’ is a question as delicate as it is misplaced. In this chapter, I will explore the historic forces behind this particular phenomenon with a view to getting some purchase over where it is likely to lead us. And this in turn engages one of the most fundamental developments that higher education in Europe has to grapple with today — namely, the rise of what at different times and across different disciplinary perspectives has been variously described as ‘the European dimension’ (Huisman et al., 2000) as the intergovernmental layer (Maassen & Neave, 2007: 135 ff) or even amongst the more metaphysically inclined within the scholarly community, as the ‘supra governmental’ dimension in the affairs of higher education (Maassen & Olsen, 2007: 3–24).
By and large, the Evaluative State on the one hand and the so-called Bologna Process on the other have been treated as separate and watertight issues — and, to some extent, indeed they are. The former quite obviously took shape and matured within in that classical setting of higher education policy, namely within the Nation State. The latter, however, represents a new and very certainly a permanent additional dimension or level of decision-making that both ties in with, whilst at the same time forming, a species of ‘supra ordinate’ layer beyond what for the past two centuries served as the highest level of aggregation in the evolution of the universities in Europe.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bauer, M. & Kogan, M. (1997). Evaluation systems in the UK and Sweden: Successes and difficulties. European Journal of Education, 32(2), 129–143.
Bauer, M. (1988), “Evaluation in Swedish higher education: recent trends and the outlines of a model,” European Journal of Education,23, 1-2 pp. 25–36.
Clark, B. R. (1983). Higher Education Organization: Cross-national Perspectives. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press.
De Groof, J. (Ed.) (1994). Subsidiarity and Education. Aspects of comparative, education, law. Leuven/ Amersfoort, Paul von der knapp.
De Miguel Diaz, M. (1999). Calidad de la Enseñanza universitaria y excelencia academica. Oviedo, Universidad de Oviedo, Servicio de Publicaciones.
Glenny, L. A. (Ed.) (1979). Funding Higher Education: A Six-Nation Analysis. New York: Praeger.
El-Khawas, E. (1992). Are buffer organizations doomed to fail?: Inevitable dilemmas and tensions. Higher Education Policy, 5(3), 18–20.
Huisman, J., Maassen, P., & Neave, G. (Eds.) (2001). Higher Education and the Nation State. Oxford, Elsevier-Pergamon for IAU.
Huitema, D., Jeliazkova, M., & Westerheijden, D. F. 2002 Phases, levels and circles in policy development The cases of higher education and environmental quality assurance. Higher Education Policy, 15(2), 197–215
HSV Rapport (2005). On looking forward to innovation, consolidation and progress: A short saga of organizational anticipation. Annex to the Final Report of the International Advisory Board. Rapport 2005:38R The Evaluation Activities of the National Agency for Higher Education in Sweden. Final report by the International Advisory Board. Stockholm: Högskoleverket (Xerox), 10 pp.
Jeliazkova, M. & Westerheijden, D. (2002). Systemic adaptation to a changing environment: Towards a next generation of quality assurance models. Higher Education, 44(3–4), 433–448.
Kehm, B. & Lazendorff, U. (2006). Reforming University Governance: Changing Conditions for Research in Four European Countries. Bonn: Lemmens.
Kogan, M. (2006). Review of Neave, Nybom & Blückert's The European Research University: an historical parenthesis? Higher Education Policy, 19(3).
Kwikkers, P et al. (2005). Evenwicht zonder sturing Wegen voor nieuw hoger onderwijs en wetenschap (deel 1). den Haag: Sdu-Uitgevers.
Lindqvist, S. (2006). The R&D production model: A Breug(h)elesque alternative. In G. Neave, T. Nybom, & K. Bluckert (Eds.), The European Research University: An Historical Parenthesis?New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 77–90.
Lub, A. (2003). Accreditation in Flanders and the Netherlands: A joint initiative, IAU Newsletter, April– June, p. 5.
Maassen, P. & Neave, G. (2007) The Bologna Process: an intergovernmental policy perspective. In P. Maassen & J. P. Olsen (Eds.), University Dynamics and European Integration. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 135–154.
Maassen, P. & Olsen, J. P. (Eds.) (2007). University Dynamics and European Integration. Dordrecht: Springer.
Mungaray-Lagarda, A. (2002). Re-engineering Mexican higher education toward economic development and quality: The XXI century challenge. Higher Education Policy, 15(4), 391–399.
Neave, G. (1996) The evaluation of the higher education system in France. In R. Cowen (Ed.), World Yearbook of Education 1966: The Evaluation of Systems of Higher Education. London: Kogan Page, pp. 66–81.
Neave, G. (2001) The European dimension in higher education: An excursion into the modern use of historical analogues. In M. Huisman & G. Neave (Eds.), Higher Education and the Nation State. Oxford: Elsevier Pergamon, pp. 13–73.
Neave, G. (2002). The stakeholder perspective historically explored. In J. Enders & O. Fulton (Eds.), Higher Education in a Globalising World: International Trends and Mutual Observations. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 17–38.
Neave (2003). “The Bologna Declaration: Some of the Historic Dilemmas posed by the Reconstruction of the Community in Europe's systems of Higher Education”, Educational Policy, vol. 17, No. 1, January & March 2003, pp, 141–164.
Neave, G. (2004a). Higher education policy as orthodoxy: Being one tale of doxological drift, political intention and changing circumstances. In D. Dill, B. Jongbloed, A. Amaral, & P. Teixeira (Eds.), Markets in Higher Education: Rhetoric or Reality?Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Neave, G. (2004b). The temple and its guardians: An excursion into the rhetoric of evaluating higher education. The Journal of Finance and Management in Colleges and Universities, 1(1) (Tokyo), 212–227.
Neave, G. (2006a). Setting the estimated time of arrival: Goals, purposes and progress in making Europe competitive and attractive. Keynote presentation to the Conference The Lisbon Agenda and the Way Ahead, Lisbon, July 10–11, 2006, Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation, 23pp.
Neave, G. (2006b). On incorporating the university. Higher Education Policy, 19(2), 129–134.
Neave, G. (2006c). The Evaluative State and Bologna: Old wine in new bottles or simply the ancient practice of ‘Coupage’? Higher Education Forum, 3, March 2006, Hiroshima (Japan), Hiroshima University Research Institute for Higher Education, pp. 27–46.
Neave, G. & van Vught, F. (1994). Prometeo Encadenado: Estado y educación superior en Europa. Barcelona: Gedisa
Neave, G., Nybom, T., & Blückert, K. (Eds.) (2006). The European Research University: A Historical Parenthesis?New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Ovodenko, A. (2004). Private higher education in the Russian Federation. In N. V. Varghese (Ed.), Private Higher Education UNESCO/IIEP: Paris
Pollitt, C. (2002). New public management in international perspective: An analysis of impacts and effects. In K. McLaughlan, S. P. Osborne, & E. Ferlie (Eds.), New Public Management: Current Trends and Future Prospects. London: Routledge.
Smale, W. & Gounko, T. (2006). Who chooses the tune? An analysis of the new initiatives in Russian higher education. Higher Education Policy, 19(3), 319–342.
Scheele, J. P. Maassen, P. A. M., & Westerheijden, D. F (Eds.) (1998). To Be Continued.…Follow Up of Quality Assurance in Higher Education. The Hague: Elsevier/De Tijdstroom.
Schwartz-Hahn, S. & Westerheijden, D. (2004). Accreditation and Evaluation in the European Higher Education Area. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Staropoli, A. (1987) The Comite National d’Evaluation: Preliminary Results of a French Experiment. European Journal of Education, 22(2), 123–131.
Teixeira, P., Jongbloed, B., Dill, D., & Amaral, A. (Eds.) (2004) Markets in Higher Education: Rhetoric or Reality?Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Tomusk, V. (2005) Open World and Closed Societies: Essays on Higher Education Policies ‘In Transition’. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Tomusk, V. (2006). Creating the European area of higher education: voices from the periphery. Dordrecht: Springer.
Trow, M. (1974). The Transition from Elite to Mass Higher Education, Paris, OECD 2 vols.
Trow, M. (1975). The public and private lives of higher education. Daedalus, 104(1), 113–127.
van Vught, F. (1989). Governmental strategies and innovation in higher education. (Higher Education Policy Series. no.7.) London: Jessica Kingsley, 232 p.
de Weert, E. & Enders, J. (2004). The International Attractiveness of the Academic Workplace in Europe. Frankfurt/Main: Gewerkschaft Erziehung und Wissenschaft GEW.
White Paper (2003). The Future of Higher Education. London: Department for Education and Skills.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Neave, G. (2009). The Evaluative State as Policy in Transition: A Historical and Anatomical Study. In: Cowen, R., Kazamias, A.M. (eds) International Handbook of Comparative Education. Springer International Handbooks of Education, vol 22. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6403-6_35
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6403-6_35
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-6402-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-6403-6
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)