Skip to main content

Abstract

Material properties, loading, geometry and manufacturing processes are considered as the major elements in fatigue design problems. The effect of geometry has always been one of the challenging issues for designers to face with. The methodologies to transfer material properties obtained from specimen fatigue tests to fatigue behavior of real components, where neither a nominal stress nor a notch factor could be defined, have not been completely accurate or reliable. Therefore, direct component testing, though time consuming and expensive, is often a necessity in fatigue design. Contrary to specimen testing, which numerous standards have been developed for, component testing is more a matter of designer’s practice. Various parameters such as simulation of the actual service condition, collecting useful data, and correspondence of the test results to analytical predictions determine the correctness and applicability of the conducted test. Based on previous studies regarding fatigue testing of components [19], this article intends to provide a step-by-step guideline to conduct fatigue testing, with a focus on automotive parts. Essential pretest, during-the-test, and post-test details are discussed. The guideline is implemented on sample steering knuckles and connecting rods as example parts, and the challenges and shortcomings for each test are investigated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Beretta, S., Blarasin, A., Endo, M., Giunti, T., and Murakami, Y., International Journal of Fatigue, vol. 19, no. 4, 319–333, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Berger, C., Eulitz, K.G., Heuler, P., Kotte, K.L., Naundorf, H., Schuetz, W., Sonsino, C. M., Wimmer A., and Zenner, H., International Journal of Fatigue, vol. 24, 603–625, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chu, C.C., International Journal of Fatigue, vol. 19(supp. no. 1), S325–S330, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Firat, M. and Kocabicak, U., Engineering Failure Analysis, vol. 11, 655–674, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Heuler, P. and Birk, O., Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures, vol. 25, 1135–1148, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lee, Y.L., Raymond, M.N., and Villaire, M.A., Journal of Testing and Evaluation, vol. 23, 354–363, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Savaidis, G., Material Wissenschaft und Werkstoff technik, vol. 32, no. 4, 362–368, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Zoroufi, M. and Fatemi, A., SAE Technical Paper No. 2004-01-0628, Society of Automotive Engineers, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Taylor, D., Bologna, P., and Bel Knani, K., International Journal of Fatigue, vol. 22, 735–742, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer

About this paper

Cite this paper

Zoroufi, M., Fatemi, A. (2007). A Guideline for Fatigue Testing of Components. In: Gdoutos, E.E. (eds) Experimental Analysis of Nano and Engineering Materials and Structures. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6239-1_85

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6239-1_85

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-6238-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-6239-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics