Skip to main content

Embryo Adoption Theologically Considered: Bodies, Adoption, and the Common Good

  • Chapter
The Ethics of Embryo Adoption and the Catholic Tradition

Part of the book series: Philosophy and Medicine ((CSBE,volume 95))

When a genuinely contested question arises in moral theology, initial analyses inevitably settle around particular lines of argument and counter-argument that rely on relevant moral claims which are presumed stable and settled. Mutual criticism, discussion, and further reflection bring more nuance and texture to these lines of argument as they also illumine those claims and teachings taken to be reliable moral markers or building blocks. What takes shape is a “debate” with more or less clearly demarcated “sides,” and subsequent scholarly entries into the contested question must traverse the debate’s terrain. Eventually, however, new routes into the question are called for and charted, as newcomers to and veterans of the debate alike begin to challenge the terms on which the conversation has settled.

In the case of embryo adoption, analyses have settled around the question whether it is morally permissible to transfer a genetically unrelated embryo into the uterus of a married woman, and answers to this question are crafted by appealing to relatively stable and settled Catholic teaching on marriage, or more specifically to the marriage “act” (i.e., heterosexual intercourse) or to the marital/nuptial significance of the human body. This essay argues that many of the heretofore available Catholic arguments about embryo adoption are methodologically flawed, problematically gendered, and theologically deficient. After developing these charges, the essay explores embryo adoption in light of theological reflection on Christ’s body and ours, adoption, and the common good. While I judge that embryo adoption is at least sometimes morally permissible, my aim here is not so much to argue for the moral permissibility of the practice, but (like Eric Gregory does admirably in his contribution to this volume) to call for and inaugurate more robustly moral theological consideration of the practice. More specifically, I consider embryo adoption in light of the affirmation that we are made God’s adopted children by being incorporated into Christ’s body.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bartholet, E. (1993). Family Bonds: Adoption, Infertility, and the New World of Child Production. Boston, MA: Beacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkman, J.R. (2002). ‘The morality of adopting frozen embryos in light of Donum Vitae,’ Studia Moralia, 40, 115–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkman, J.R. (2003a). ‘Gestating the embryos of others,’ National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly, 3, 309–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkman, J.R. (2003b). ‘Reply to Tonti-Filippini on “Gestating the embryos of others”,’ National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly, 4, 12–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkman, J.R. (2006). ‘Virtuous parenting and orphaned embryos,’ in T. Berg & E. Furton (Eds.), Human Embryo Adoption: Biotechnology, Marriage, and the Right to Life (pp. 13–36). Philadelphia, PA; Thornwood, NY: The National Catholic Bioethics Center and the Westchester Institute for Ethics and the Human Person.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brugger, E.C. (2006). ‘A defense by analogy of heterologous embryo transfer,’ in T. Berg & E. Furton (Eds.), Human Embryo Adoption: Biotechnology, Marriage, and the Right to Life. Washington, DC: The Westchester Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cahill, L.S. (1996). Sex, Gender, and Christian Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cahill, L.S. (2005). ‘Adoption: A Roman Catholic perspective,’ in Timothy P. Jackson (Ed.), The Morality of Adoption: Social-Psychological, Theological, and Legal Perspectives. Grand Rapids, MI and Cambridge: Eerdmans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (1987). Donum Vitae (Instruction on Respect for Human Life in Its Origin and on the Dignity of Procreation: Replies to Certain Questions of the Day) [Online]. Available: http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/ rc_con_cfaith_doc_19870222_respect-for-human-life_en.html.

  • Gaudium et Spes: The Pastoral Constitution on the Church in the Modern World (1965), in A. Flannery (Ed.) (1992). Vatican Council II, the Conciliar and Post Conciliar Documents. North Port, NY: Costello.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geach, M. (1999). ‘Are there any circumstances in which it would be morally admirable for a woman to seek to have an orphan embryo implanted in her womb?’ in L. Gormally (Ed.), Issues for a Catholic Bioethic (pp. 341–346). London: The Linacre Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geach, M. (2006). ‘The female act of allowing an intromission of an impregnating kind,’ in T. Berg & E. Furton (Eds.), Human Embryo Adoption: Biotechnology, Marriage, and the Right to Life (pp. 251–271). Philadelphia, PA; Thornwood, NY: The National Catholic Bioethics Center and the Westchester Institute for Ethics and the Human Person.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, P.J. (2005). ‘Christians and the Church,’ in G. Meilaender & W. Werpehoski (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Theological Ethics (pp. 398–412). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grisez, G. (1997). ‘Should a woman try to bear her dead sister’s embryo?’ in The Way of the Lord Jesus, Vol. 3, Difficult Moral Questions (pp. 239–244). Quincy, IL: Franciscan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • John, XXIII (1961). Mater et Magistra (On Christianity and Social Progress) [Online]. Available: http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_xxiii/encyclicals/documents/hf_j-xxiii_enc_ 15051961_mater_en.html.

  • John Paul, II (1981). Familiaris Consortio (The Christian Family in the Modern World). [Online]. Available: http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/apost_exhortations/documents/hf_jp-ii_ exh_19811122_familiaris-consortio_en.html.

  • Kerr, F. (2007). Twentieth Century Catholic Theologians: From Neoscholasticism to Nuptial Mysticism. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, S.A. (2006). ‘An argument for the embryonic intactness of marriage,’ The Thomist, 70, 267–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, W.E. (2006). ‘The object of the acting woman in embryo rescue,’ in T.V. Berg & E.J Furton (Eds.), Human Embryo Adoption: Biotechnology, Marriage, and the Right to Life (pp. 135–163). Philadelphia, PA, Thornwood, NY: The National Catholic Bioethics Center and The Westchester Institute for Ethics and the Human Person.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oleson, C. (2006). ‘The nuptial womb: On the moral significance of being “with child”,’ in T.V. Berg & E.J. Furton (Eds.), Human Embryo Adoption: Biotechnology, Marriage, and the Right to Life (pp. 165–195). Philadelphia, PA, Thornwood, NY: The National Catholic Bioethics Center and The Westchester Institute for Ethics and the Human Person.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, M.A. (2001). Ethics and Economics of Assisted Reproduction: The Cost of Longing. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tonti-Filippini, N. (2006). ‘The embryo rescue debate: Impregnating women, ectogenesis, and restoration from suspended animation,’ in T. Berg & E. Furton (Eds.), Human Embryo Adoption: Biotechnology, Marriage, and the Right to Life (pp. 69–114). Philadelphia, PA; Thornwood, NY: The National Catholic Bioethics Center and The Westchester Institute for Ethics and the Human Person.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, D.F. (2005). ‘Death,’ in G. Meilaender & W. Werpehoski (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Theological Ethics (pp. 254–270). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, D.F. (forthcoming). ‘Embryo adoption: Expanding the terms of the debate,’ in L. Hogan (Ed.), Catholic Theological Ethics in the World Church. New York: Orbis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, S. (2005). ‘Christians and family,’ in G. Meilaender & W. Werpehoski (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Theological Ethics (pp. 343–359). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer Science + Business Media B.V

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Weaver, D.F. (2007). Embryo Adoption Theologically Considered: Bodies, Adoption, and the Common Good. In: Brakman, SV., Weaver, D.F. (eds) The Ethics of Embryo Adoption and the Catholic Tradition. Philosophy and Medicine, vol 95. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6211-7_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6211-7_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-6210-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-6211-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics